On 05/10/2015 11:46, gareth wrote:
"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 05/10/2015 11:02, gareth wrote:
"Fredxxx" wrote in message
...
On 05/10/2015 10:48, gareth wrote:
"rickman" wrote in message
...
How about you guys keep your dispute in the UK? Please take
rec.radio.amateur.antenna off your reply to list,,, please?
For as long as Tomlinson continues with his unilateral vendetta of
character assassination, I will continue to reply defensively in all
the NGs that Tomlinson spammed in the first place.
But, shame on you for postng to a NG that you do not read.
Shame on you feeling obliged to spam the uk.legal newsgroup with your
"defensive" replies.
The right of reply is a strong right.
Why should you object to it?
Due to your accusation you make of rickman in replying to a post in a
group he doesn't read.

He had removed the cross-post to his own group, I restored it for two
reasons; firstly
so that he would know of the courtesy of my reply, and secondly, because it
was a continuation of Tomlinson's vendetta.

Perhaps your real complaint is with Tomlinson for spamming in the first
place all the NGs
that he though that I frequented?

Carefully look at Richards first post. It was was uk.legal.

Then look at your post 28/09/15 19:52. It's a bit rich for you to refer
to anyone else as a spammer.

Anyway this thread is now killed in my newsreader.