Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 27th 04, 07:28 PM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default Long wire at 6m?

Can I use a long wire at 6m with a random wire antenna tuner?
The wire is about 1/4 mile long, and off the ground about 6 foot,
(old electrified fence line on top of a fence)
Any Idea what the pattern would be? or if it would work?

Thanks


  #2   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 02:15 AM
Lloyd Mitchell
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Try loading it thru a tuner and let us know !!

Go for it John!

Mitch KD4HTW


"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Can I use a long wire at 6m with a random wire antenna tuner?
The wire is about 1/4 mile long, and off the ground about 6 foot,
(old electrified fence line on top of a fence)
Any Idea what the pattern would be? or if it would work?

Thanks




  #3   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 02:16 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:28:33 -0600, "John Smith"
wrote:

Can I use a long wire at 6m with a random wire antenna tuner?
The wire is about 1/4 mile long, and off the ground about 6 foot,
(old electrified fence line on top of a fence)
Any Idea what the pattern would be? or if it would work?

Thanks


Hi John,

Well at least we don't need to preface this with it wouldn't be worth
the effort (it's already strung).

Basically you will see about 15dB gain along its axis, maybe 2dB
broadside and every value in between (including negative values) as
you box the compass. When modeled, it gives the picture of a
hedge-hog.

There are sooooo many lobes you are bound to see at least dipole
performance in any direction.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 04:41 AM
Tom Ring
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Nope, it will be much much less than dipole in almost every direction
except the direction of the wire. There is only so much energy to go
around, and most of it is going in the forward or forward/backward
directions, depending on termination of the wire.

"You cannu break the laws of physics, captain!" - Only a half wave
dipole will act like a half wave dipole.

tom
K0TAR

Richard Clark wrote:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 13:28:33 -0600, "John Smith"
wrote:

snip

Hi John,

snip

There are sooooo many lobes you are bound to see at least dipole
performance in any direction.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


  #5   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 06:00 AM
Ken Fowler
 
Posts: n/a
Default


On 27-Mar-2004, "John Smith" wrote:

Can I use a long wire at 6m with a random wire antenna tuner?
The wire is about 1/4 mile long, and off the ground about 6 foot,
(old electrified fence line on top of a fence)
Any Idea what the pattern would be? or if it would work?

Thanks


Take it with a grain of salt. Quick and dirty evaluation with EZNEC (Real MININEC ground, #10
Aluminum wire) shows 9.65 dBi at 10 deg elevation, vertical beamwidth of 2.7 deg., and horizontal
beamwidth of 11 deg. in the direction of the unfed end. I had to reduce the length to 1050 ft. to
keep the number of segments below EZNEC's limit of 500. I suspect that the gain and beamwidth would
not be much different at 1320 feet.

I just played around with the length trying to find a resonant point. Seems that as the length is
reduced, the resistive part of the feedpoint impedance changes from around 200 ohms to around 800
ohms while the reactive part is always negative. I placed the source at the bottom of a vertical
wire from ground to the horizontal wire. Other feedpoints might differ. Anyway, it looks like a
fairly high impedance feed.

So if you want a strong signal in the direction of the fence at 10 deg. elevation, it might be a
useful antenna. Other directions will suffer.

Ken Fowler, KO6NO


  #6   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 07:45 AM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:41:20 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:

Nope, it will be much much less than dipole in almost every direction
except the direction of the wire. There is only so much energy to go
around, and most of it is going in the forward or forward/backward
directions, depending on termination of the wire.

"You cannu break the laws of physics, captain!" - Only a half wave
dipole will act like a half wave dipole.

tom


Hello Major Tom,

Count down, systems on. You haven't modeled have you?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #7   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 02:38 PM
Annette & LJ Dumas
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The heck with 6 meters, you've got a near-ideal Beverage! Go for 160M!

73

Joe D
N2LJD
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Can I use a long wire at 6m with a random wire antenna tuner?
The wire is about 1/4 mile long, and off the ground about 6 foot,
(old electrified fence line on top of a fence)
Any Idea what the pattern would be? or if it would work?

Thanks




  #8   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 02:38 PM
Tom Ring
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Enough so I don't have to model the obvious. I alpha tested 3 different
modeling programs for the author in the early 90's, currently own 5 if I
remember correctly, have modeled hundreds of yagis, built dozens, and
tons of other, non-yagi radiating structures. And designed and built
the highest gain 432 antenna ever tested at Central States VHF
Conference.

If most of the energy is going off the end(s), there can't be much left
to go off the sides, therefore it can't perform like a dipole off the
sides. Those little spikes are very misleading, and very narrow. Apply
an averaging function 2 or 3 degrees wide on the spikes and the nulls,
and you'll see a much truer picture.

The physics doesn't lie - antenna patterns are a have to add up to 100%
of the input power (ignoring losses). If, picking nice round numbers,
90% is in 5 degrees off the end, then only 10% is available for th.

tom
K0TAR

Richard Clark wrote:

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:41:20 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:


Nope, it will be much much less than dipole in almost every direction
except the direction of the wire. There is only so much energy to go
around, and most of it is going in the forward or forward/backward
directions, depending on termination of the wire.

"You cannu break the laws of physics, captain!" - Only a half wave
dipole will act like a half wave dipole.

tom



Hello Major Tom,

Count down, systems on. You haven't modeled have you?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


  #9   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 06:02 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:38:59 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:

If most of the energy is going off the end(s), there can't be much left
to go off the sides, therefore it can't perform like a dipole off the
sides. Those little spikes are very misleading, and very narrow. Apply
an averaging function 2 or 3 degrees wide on the spikes and the nulls,
and you'll see a much truer picture.


The program defaulted to 5 degrees which still presented so many lobes
as to be a pin cushion. The net effect is that aside from axial
gain, off side is still pretty much dipole average. No one really
expects those sharp lobes to actually represent reality except if you
were working EME with an apeture that couldn't see ground. Such deep
nulls of only a couple degrees wide only exist in line of sight.

There's a world of difference between modeling antenna characteristics
and propagation reality.


The physics doesn't lie - antenna patterns are a have to add up to 100%
of the input power (ignoring losses). If, picking nice round numbers,
90% is in 5 degrees off the end, then only 10% is available for th.


90% for 10% coverage does not absorb all the gain available; the
multitude of sharp lobes in excess of 2dBi is abundant proof of that.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #10   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 10:31 PM
Bob Miller
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 28 Mar 2004 07:38:59 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:

Enough so I don't have to model the obvious. I alpha tested 3 different
modeling programs for the author in the early 90's, currently own 5 if I
remember correctly, have modeled hundreds of yagis, built dozens, and
tons of other, non-yagi radiating structures. And designed and built
the highest gain 432 antenna ever tested at Central States VHF
Conference.

If most of the energy is going off the end(s), there can't be much left
to go off the sides, therefore it can't perform like a dipole off the
sides.


Suppose you modeled it as a longish dipole? One leg is a quarter wave
at six meters, the other leg is an odd number of 6-meter quarter
waves, stretching out a quarter mile?

Bob
k5qwg

Those little spikes are very misleading, and very narrow. Apply
an averaging function 2 or 3 degrees wide on the spikes and the nulls,
and you'll see a much truer picture.

The physics doesn't lie - antenna patterns are a have to add up to 100%
of the input power (ignoring losses). If, picking nice round numbers,
90% is in 5 degrees off the end, then only 10% is available for th.

tom
K0TAR

Richard Clark wrote:

On Sat, 27 Mar 2004 21:41:20 -0600, Tom Ring
wrote:


Nope, it will be much much less than dipole in almost every direction
except the direction of the wire. There is only so much energy to go
around, and most of it is going in the forward or forward/backward
directions, depending on termination of the wire.

"You cannu break the laws of physics, captain!" - Only a half wave
dipole will act like a half wave dipole.

tom



Hello Major Tom,

Count down, systems on. You haven't modeled have you?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Long Wire Balun Cecil Moore Antenna 16 February 25th 04 01:26 AM
Excessive RF Exposure from Long Wire? jj Antenna 22 February 13th 04 10:32 PM
randon wire newbie question lethal Antenna 4 February 7th 04 11:01 AM
Any Good Or Useful For Listening Only ?: WiNRADiO WR-LWA-0130 Long Wire Antenna Adapter Robert11 Antenna 1 November 6th 03 03:47 AM
Opinions please G5 against long wire against windom? Chris Bartlett Antenna 1 July 31st 03 11:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017