Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 05:33 AM
Frank Alforo
 
Posts: n/a
Default RF absorbent

Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to absorb
radar signals?


  #2   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 05:47 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Standard stuff is a flexible plastic with powdered ferrite to match air, but
attenuate for no reflection, usually too heavy.
Stealth I think used a carbon material that matched air but had loss, also
in little hex patterns to keep the number of reflections high, more loss.
But they would not let us get that close to it 10 foot.
--Dwezil Smith

"Frank Alforo" wrote in message
...
Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to absorb
radar signals?




  #3   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 05:48 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Alforo wrote:
Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to absorb
radar signals?


I heard the first thing they ever tried was horsehair.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 10:06 AM
Ed Price
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Frank Alforo" wrote in message
...
Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to absorb
radar signals?



The 297 hits on Google for "radar absorbent material" was information
overload? The 3,730 hits for "RF anechoic material" frightened you? And the
70,100 hits for "stealth aircraft design" sent you scurrying here to see if
we had anything for you?

At least it's nice to see you doing your homework before Sunday night.

Ed
wb6wsn

  #5   Report Post  
Old March 28th 04, 07:50 PM
Dave Shrader
 
Posts: n/a
Default

A major portion of 'stealth design' is to deflect the radar signal in
directions away from the transmitter [i.e. deflect the echo]. Hence, the
many flat panels on the F-117.

A secondary feature of the design is absorbent material.

A third feature is the hex filter designs in the windows/turbine
aperture etc [allow rf in but keep it from getting out].

But, your basic absorbing material is found in numerous graphite epoxies
whose composition is classified.

You may find useful information on basics by checking out 'space cloth'.
Space cloth is used for radar dummy loads and is available in Zo that
provide VSWRs from 5:1 to 1:1. At 1:1 there is no reflection.

Frank Alforo wrote:

Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to absorb
radar signals?





  #6   Report Post  
Old March 29th 04, 12:07 AM
Frank Alforo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave wrote:

A major portion of 'stealth design' is to deflect the radar signal in
directions away from the transmitter [i.e. deflect the echo]. Hence, the
many flat panels on the F-117.

A secondary feature of the design is absorbent material.

A third feature is the hex filter designs in the windows/turbine
aperture etc [allow rf in but keep it from getting out].

But, your basic absorbing material is found in numerous graphite epoxies
whose composition is classified.

You may find useful information on basics by checking out 'space cloth'.
Space cloth is used for radar dummy loads and is available in Zo that
provide VSWRs from 5:1 to 1:1. At 1:1 there is no reflection.


I read somewhere that the absorbant material had an impedance of 377 ohm per
square. J Kraus showed that space cloth of this impedance reflects 30
percent of the incident wave.
Is space cloth still manufactured? A google search turned up zero hits.

Tnx es 73, Frank


  #7   Report Post  
Old March 29th 04, 12:17 AM
Frank Alforo
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Ed Price" wrote in message
news:CAw9c.15750$Q45.10237@fed1read02...

"Frank Alforo" wrote in message
...
Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to

absorb
radar signals?


The 297 hits on Google for "radar absorbent material" was information
overload? The 3,730 hits for "RF anechoic material" frightened you? And

the
70,100 hits for "stealth aircraft design" sent you scurrying here to see

if
we had anything for you?


At least it's nice to see you doing your homework before Sunday night.


Ed
wb6wsn


Tnx for the tip, Ed. Your point is well taken. But it seems to me that the
same can be said for the great majority of the posts seen here. Perhaps we
need a moderator to keep irksome and inane posts from cluttering up the
newsgroup and provoking the ire of the members who visit here.

Frank


  #8   Report Post  
Old March 29th 04, 12:41 AM
Dave Shrader
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Alforo wrote:

SNIP

I read somewhere that the absorbant material had an impedance of 377 ohm per
square. J Kraus showed that space cloth of this impedance reflects 30
percent of the incident wave.
Is space cloth still manufactured? A google search turned up zero hits.

Tnx es 73, Frank


I last purchased 'space cloth' [122 ohm/square] in 1990. I don't know if
it's still manufactured.

W1MCE

  #9   Report Post  
Old March 29th 04, 01:06 AM
Ed Price
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Frank Alforo" wrote in message
...

"Ed Price" wrote in message
news:CAw9c.15750$Q45.10237@fed1read02...

"Frank Alforo" wrote in message
...
Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to

absorb
radar signals?


The 297 hits on Google for "radar absorbent material" was information
overload? The 3,730 hits for "RF anechoic material" frightened you? And

the
70,100 hits for "stealth aircraft design" sent you scurrying here to see

if
we had anything for you?


At least it's nice to see you doing your homework before Sunday night.


Ed
wb6wsn


Tnx for the tip, Ed. Your point is well taken. But it seems to me that the
same can be said for the great majority of the posts seen here. Perhaps we
need a moderator to keep irksome and inane posts from cluttering up the
newsgroup and provoking the ire of the members who visit here.

Frank



Naah, an official moderator isn't needed. Besides, he'd get burned out too
fast anyway.

BTW, absorbent material is NOT 377 ohms per square. The traditional
absorbent material is decidedly low-tech, consisting of open-cell urethane
foam with carbon particles dispersed along the cell walls. The grungy way to
make this is to cast a monster billet of foam, maybe 10' long by 4' by 4'.
The billet is then squashed flat in a press, and submerged in a solution of
carbon particles (lampblack; and seems I heard of that being made by
scraping the soot of a propane flame off of a copper block), water and
ethylene glycol (for wetting). The billet is allowed to expand, soaking up
the solution, and then drips dry. It's just like a huge kitchen sponge.
Particles of carbon are then left disperesed, almost painted, on the cell
walls. Then, after some more oven drying, they cut the billet, with a hot
wire, into those fancy pyramidal shapes. Then, some latex spray paint for
that high-tech blue or white look. And then they sell them to you for $175
per 24" square!

If you think of a plane wave propagating along, it has a 377 ohm wave
impedance over a unit area of wavefront. As the wave encounters the tips of
the pyramidal cones, a bit of the wave begins to encounter a slightly lower
impedance. As the wave propagates further, the impedance over the unit area
decreases. The wave begins to lose energy to ohmic heating of the lower and
lower impedance medium. Finally, at the base of the cones, the wave is
trying to propagate in a much lower than 377 ohm medium, and it's giving up
energy rapidly to warm the carbon particles. (With enough energy lost, it
might even melt the foam or ignite it.)

The tapered shape is used so as to present a gradual change in impedance.
The thing to avoid is any sudden change in impedance, which would result in
a reflection. There is much debate on optimizing the shape; right pyramids,
truncated pyramids, rotated sections of the pyramid, cones; some have
advantages in certain applications. The particles creating the loading can
be adjusted; sometimes ferrite particles are used with, or in place of, the
carbon.

(Before urethane foam was used, early researchers did use horse-hair. Maybe
one of them had some auto upholstery experience to draw on.)

All stealth is a combination of absorbing what you can, reflecting what you
can't (in more benign directions), trapping energy in labyrinths and
avoiding resonant structures (like exposed weapons or long panel seams,
etc). Another approach is to use multi-layer 'sandwiches" to create ohase
cancellation to a wave, but this is really difficult to optimize for more
than one frequency.

Ed
wb6wsn




  #10   Report Post  
Old March 29th 04, 08:08 AM
Mike
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I think someone would be in a lot of trouble if you find the recipe for
a specific stealth aircraft on the Internet. The "spacecloth" mentioned
in another post could be similar to Echosorb, a popular microwave RF
absorbent material that is available in sheet form. It ranges from a
1/16" thick pliable rubber to thicker, multilayer foam that looks like
the black antistatic foam used to ship IC's and other semiconductors.

Frank Alforo wrote:
Anybody have any info the material used on the stealth aircraft to absorb
radar signals?


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017