Resurrecting the Church of Twisted: My CB Friends

[Twistedhed]

Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Oct 27, 2003, 4:32am (EST+5) From: =A0=A0
X-Apparently-From: =A0=A0
X-AOL-IP: =A0=A0 152.163.243.145
X-Brightmail: =A0=A0 Message tested
To: =A0=A0 undisclosed-recipients:;
Received: =A0from rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
[64.12.138.9]) by smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with
ESMTP id F272111DEC for >; Sun, 26 Oct 2003
20:36:18 -0800 (PST)
(retrieving sender name)
64.12.138.9
ips are close enough
64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
64.12.138.9 is mx
Received line accepted
Received: =A0from logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
[152.163.243.145]) by rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (v95.1) with ESMTP id
RELAYIN2-33f9ca0b3f3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:36:03 2000
host 64.12.138.9 (getting name) =3D rly-ip05.mx.aol.com.
host rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 64.12.138.9
64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
64.12.138.9 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
64.12.138.9 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
64.12.138.9 is not an MX for smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net
ips are close enough
64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
152.163.243.145
152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
Possible relay: 64.12.138.9
64.12.138.9 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
64.12.138.9 has already been sent to relay testers
Received line accepted
Received: (AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
[172.159.156.229]) by logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP
id h9R4WEM1160858 for >; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 04:32:15
GMT
host 152.163.243.145 (getting name) =3D logs-tk.proxy.aol.com.
host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
172.159.156.229
172.159.156.229 is not an MX for AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
host AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 172.159.156.229
host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
=A0=A0=A0Chain test:logs-tk.proxy.aol.com =3D? logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
=A0=A0=A0logs-tk.proxy.aol.com and logs-tk.proxy.aol.com have same
hostname - chain verified
Possible relay: 152.163.243.145
152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
152.163.243.145 has already been sent to relay testers
Received line accepted
172.159.156.229 discarded as a forgery, using 152.163.243.145
Tracking message source: 152.163.243.145:
Routing details for 152.163.243.145
[refresh/show] Cached whois for 152.163.243.145 :
Using abuse net on
abuse net aol.net =3D
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
152.163.243.145 not listed in query.bondedsender.org
Send complaints to: (administrator)
Re:152.163.243.145

[(Scott Unit 69)]

(Twistedhed) wrote:
>Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Oct 27, 2003, 4:32am (EST+5) From: =A0=A0
X-Apparently-From: =A0=A0
>X-AOL-IP: =A0=A0 152.163.243.145
>X-Brightmail: =A0=A0 Message tested
>To: =A0=A0 undisclosed-recipients:;
>Received: =A0from rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
>[64.12.138.9]) by smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with
>ESMTP id F272111DEC for >; Sun, 26 Oct 2003
>20:36:18 -0800 (PST)
>(retrieving sender name)
> 64.12.138.9
>ips are close enough
>64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
>64.12.138.9 is mx
>Received line accepted
>Received: =A0from logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>[152.163.243.145]) by rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (v95.1) with ESMTP id
>RELAYIN2-33f9ca0b3f3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:36:03 2000
>host 64.12.138.9 (getting name) =3D rly-ip05.mx.aol.com.
>host rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 64.12.138.9
>64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>64.12.138.9 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>64.12.138.9 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>64.12.138.9 is not an MX for smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net
>ips are close enough
>64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
>152.163.243.145
>152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
>Possible relay: 64.12.138.9
>64.12.138.9 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
>64.12.138.9 has already been sent to relay testers
>Received line accepted
>Received: (AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
>[172.159.156.229]) by logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP
>id h9R4WEM1160858 for >; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 04:32:15
>GMT
>host 152.163.243.145 (getting name) =3D logs-tk.proxy.aol.com.
>host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
>152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>172.159.156.229
>172.159.156.229 is not an MX for AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
>host AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 172.159.156.229
>host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>=A0=A0=A0Chain test:logs-tk.proxy.aol.com =3D? logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>=A0=A0=A0logs-tk.proxy.aol.com and logs-tk.proxy.aol.com have same
>hostname - chain verified
>Possible relay: 152.163.243.145
>152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
>152.163.243.145 has already been sent to relay testers
>Received line accepted
>172.159.156.229 discarded as a forgery, using 152.163.243.145
>Tracking message source: 152.163.243.145:
>Routing details for 152.163.243.145
>[refresh/show] Cached whois for 152.163.243.145 :
>Using abuse net on
>abuse net aol.net =3D
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
>152.163.243.145 not listed in query.bondedsender.org
>Send complaints to: (administrator)
>Re:152.163.243.145
>
>
>
>

What does any of this mean?

[Steveo]

"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
> (Twistedhed) wrote:
> >Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Oct 27, 2003, 4:32am (EST+5) From: =A0=A0
> X-Apparently-From: =A0=A0
> >X-AOL-IP: =A0=A0 152.163.243.145
> >X-Brightmail: =A0=A0 Message tested
> >To: =A0=A0 undisclosed-recipients:;
> >Received: =A0from rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
> >[64.12.138.9]) by smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with
> >ESMTP id F272111DEC for >; Sun, 26 Oct 2003
> >20:36:18 -0800 (PST)
> >(retrieving sender name)
> > 64.12.138.9
> >ips are close enough
> >64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
> >64.12.138.9 is mx
> >Received line accepted
> >Received: =A0from logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >[152.163.243.145]) by rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (v95.1) with ESMTP id
> >RELAYIN2-33f9ca0b3f3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:36:03 2000
> >host 64.12.138.9 (getting name) =3D rly-ip05.mx.aol.com.
> >host rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 64.12.138.9
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >64.12.138.9 is not an MX for smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net
> >ips are close enough
> >64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
> >152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
> >Possible relay: 64.12.138.9
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
> >64.12.138.9 has already been sent to relay testers
> >Received line accepted
> >Received: (AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
> >[172.159.156.229]) by logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP
> >id h9R4WEM1160858 for >; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 04:32:15
> >GMT
> >host 152.163.243.145 (getting name) =3D logs-tk.proxy.aol.com.
> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >172.159.156.229
> >172.159.156.229 is not an MX for AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
> >host AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 172.159.156.229
> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >=A0=A0=A0Chain test:logs-tk.proxy.aol.com =3D? logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >=A0=A0=A0logs-tk.proxy.aol.com and logs-tk.proxy.aol.com have same
> >hostname - chain verified
> >Possible relay: 152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
> >152.163.243.145 has already been sent to relay testers
> >Received line accepted
> >172.159.156.229 discarded as a forgery, using 152.163.243.145
> >Tracking message source: 152.163.243.145:
> >Routing details for 152.163.243.145
> >[refresh/show] Cached whois for 152.163.243.145 :
> >Using abuse net on
> >abuse net aol.net =3D
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in query.bondedsender.org
> >Send complaints to: (administrator)
> >Re:152.163.243.145
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> What does any of this mean?
>
Got me. Why do you post as Scott?

[(Scott Unit 69)]

Steveo > wrote:
>"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
>> (Twistedhed) wrote:
>> >Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Oct 27, 2003, 4:32am (EST+5) From: =A0=A0
>> X-Apparently-From: =A0=A0
>> >X-AOL-IP: =A0=A0 152.163.243.145
>> >X-Brightmail: =A0=A0 Message tested
>> >To: =A0=A0 undisclosed-recipients:;
>> >Received: =A0from rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
>> >[64.12.138.9]) by smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with
>> >ESMTP id F272111DEC for >; Sun, 26 Oct 2003
>> >20:36:18 -0800 (PST)
>> >(retrieving sender name)
>> > 64.12.138.9
>> >ips are close enough
>> >64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
>> >64.12.138.9 is mx
>> >Received line accepted
>> >Received: =A0from logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>> >[152.163.243.145]) by rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (v95.1) with ESMTP id
>> >RELAYIN2-33f9ca0b3f3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:36:03 2000
>> >host 64.12.138.9 (getting name) =3D rly-ip05.mx.aol.com.
>> >host rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 64.12.138.9
>> >64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>> >64.12.138.9 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>> >64.12.138.9 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>> >64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>> >64.12.138.9 is not an MX for smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net
>> >ips are close enough
>> >64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
>> >152.163.243.145
>> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
>> >Possible relay: 64.12.138.9
>> >64.12.138.9 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
>> >64.12.138.9 has already been sent to relay testers
>> >Received line accepted
>> >Received: (AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
>> >[172.159.156.229]) by logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP
>> >id h9R4WEM1160858 for >; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 04:32:15
>> >GMT
>> >host 152.163.243.145 (getting name) =3D logs-tk.proxy.aol.com.
>> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
>> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>> >172.159.156.229
>> >172.159.156.229 is not an MX for AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
>> >host AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 172.159.156.229
>> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>> >=A0=A0=A0Chain test:logs-tk.proxy.aol.com =3D? logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
>> >=A0=A0=A0logs-tk.proxy.aol.com and logs-tk.proxy.aol.com have same
>> >hostname - chain verified
>> >Possible relay: 152.163.243.145
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
>> >152.163.243.145 has already been sent to relay testers
>> >Received line accepted
>> >172.159.156.229 discarded as a forgery, using 152.163.243.145
>> >Tracking message source: 152.163.243.145:
>> >Routing details for 152.163.243.145
>> >[refresh/show] Cached whois for 152.163.243.145 :
>> >Using abuse net on
>> >abuse net aol.net =3D
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
>> >152.163.243.145 not listed in query.bondedsender.org
>> >Send complaints to: (administrator)
>> >Re:152.163.243.145
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>> What does any of this mean?
>>
>Got me. Why do you post as Scott?

Because I am Scott. DUH!

[Steveo]

"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
> Steveo > wrote:
> >> What does any of this mean?
> >>
> >Got me. Why do you post as Scott?
>
> Because I am Scott. DUH!
>
No you're not.

-------
/ \
/ \ /-----\
| (@) | | DuH |
| (O) | \_ ___/
| / | ||
| \ /_ / //
\ \____/ / /
\ /
\_____,

[(Scott Unit 69)]

Steveo > wrote:
>"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
>> Steveo > wrote:
>> >> What does any of this mean?
>> >>
>> >Got me. Why do you post as Scott?
>>
>> Because I am Scott. DUH!
>>
>No you're not.
>
> -------
> / \
> / \ /-----\
> | (@) | | DuH |
> | (O) | \_ ___/
> | / | ||
> | \ /_ / //
> \ \____/ / /
> \ /
> \_____,


Well your wrong. You think everyone is "George". That guy has you tied up
in knots. Excuse me if I don't play.

[Steveo]

"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
> Steveo > wrote:
> >"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
> >> Steveo > wrote:
> >> >> What does any of this mean?
> >> >>
> >> >Got me. Why do you post as Scott?
> >>
> >> Because I am Scott. DUH!
> >>
> >No you're not.
> >
> > -------
> > / \
> > / \ /-----\
> > | (@) | | DuH |
> > | (O) | \_ ___/
> > | / | ||
> > | \ /_ / //
> > \ \____/ / /
> > \ /
> > \_____,
>
> Well your wrong. You think everyone is "George". That guy has you tied up
> in knots. Excuse me if I don't play.
>
No, ^^^^^^ that guy has -you- tied up in knots, good likeness.

[Landshark]

"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote in message
...
>
> (Twistedhed) wrote:
> >Date: =A0=A0 Mon, Oct 27, 2003, 4:32am (EST+5) From: =A0=A0
> X-Apparently-From: =A0=A0
> >X-AOL-IP: =A0=A0 152.163.243.145
> >X-Brightmail: =A0=A0 Message tested
> >To: =A0=A0 undisclosed-recipients:;
> >Received: =A0from rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
> >[64.12.138.9]) by smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net (WebTV_Postfix+sws) with
> >ESMTP id F272111DEC for >; Sun, 26 Oct 2003
> >20:36:18 -0800 (PST)
> >(retrieving sender name)
> > 64.12.138.9
> >ips are close enough
> >64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
> >64.12.138.9 is mx
> >Received line accepted
> >Received: =A0from logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >[152.163.243.145]) by rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (v95.1) with ESMTP id
> >RELAYIN2-33f9ca0b3f3; Sun, 26 Oct 2003 23:36:03 2000
> >host 64.12.138.9 (getting name) =3D rly-ip05.mx.aol.com.
> >host rly-ip05.mx.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 64.12.138.9
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >64.12.138.9 is not an MX for smtpin-3208.bay.webtv.net
> >ips are close enough
> >64.12.138.9 is close to an MX (64.12.138.120) for aol.com
> >152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
> >Possible relay: 64.12.138.9
> >64.12.138.9 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
> >64.12.138.9 has already been sent to relay testers
> >Received line accepted
> >Received: (AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
> >[172.159.156.229]) by logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP
> >id h9R4WEM1160858 for >; Mon, 27 Oct 2003 04:32:15
> >GMT
> >host 152.163.243.145 (getting name) =3D logs-tk.proxy.aol.com.
> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >152.163.243.145 is not an MX for rly-ip05.mx.aol.com
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >172.159.156.229
> >172.159.156.229 is not an MX for AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com
> >host AC9F9CE5.ipt.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 172.159.156.229
> >host logs-tk.proxy.aol.com (checking ip) =3D 152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >=A0=A0=A0Chain test:logs-tk.proxy.aol.com =3D? logs-tk.proxy.aol.com
> >=A0=A0=A0logs-tk.proxy.aol.com and logs-tk.proxy.aol.com have same
> >hostname - chain verified
> >Possible relay: 152.163.243.145
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
> >152.163.243.145 has already been sent to relay testers
> >Received line accepted
> >172.159.156.229 discarded as a forgery, using 152.163.243.145
> >Tracking message source: 152.163.243.145:
> >Routing details for 152.163.243.145
> >[refresh/show] Cached whois for 152.163.243.145 :
> >Using abuse net on
> >abuse net aol.net =3D
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in relays.ordb.org.
> >152.163.243.145 not listed in query.bondedsender.org
> >Send complaints to: (administrator)
> >Re:152.163.243.145
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> What does any of this mean?


He's showing that you are forging Scott's
name, using AOL proxy through Ghostsearchers
website.


Landshark

[Brainbuster]

Steveo wrote in message >...
>"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
>>
>> <snipped - at last>
>>
>> What does any of this mean?
>>
>Got me. Why do you post as Scott?


Probably for the same reason as he posts as me and Twistedhed.
His life is so sad, he would rather be anyone other than himself.

The trouble is that Ghostsearchers are getting so many complaints that they
are considering dropping the CB groups, rather than have their whole service
stopped.


Regards,

Peter.

[(Scott Unit 69)]

"Brainbuster" > wrote:
>Steveo wrote in message >...
>>"(Scott Unit 69)" > wrote:
>>>
>>> <snipped - at last>
>>>
>>> What does any of this mean?
>>>
>>Got me. Why do you post as Scott?
>
>
>Probably for the same reason as he posts as me and Twistedhed.
>His life is so sad, he would rather be anyone other than himself.
>
>The trouble is that Ghostsearchers are getting so many complaints that they
>are considering dropping the CB groups, rather than have their whole service
>stopped.
>
>
>Regards,
>
>Peter.
>
>
>

Just because I got a ham license, didn't post here for a while, and use Ghostbusters
instead of my regular ISP to minimize spam, now I am accused of forging myself.
And you wonder why my enthusiasm for CB has left me.

[Landshark]

"Dave Hall" > wrote in message
...
> (Scott Unit 69) wrote:
> >
> > > >
> > My IP hasn't changed either. I know what this is all about - just
because
> > I got my ham license and criticized Twist suddenly I am accused of
forging
> > by Landshark and others. I always thought better of you Randy but I see
I
> > am wrong.
>
>
> Welcome to the dark side Obi-Wan.
>
> Dave
> "Sandbagger"


Unfortunately that's not Scott. He has e mailed me
and others informing us that this person was forging
him.
I could care less whether or not he has a ticket or
not, this is just a ploy of "Ham vs. CB" troll.

Landshark


--
Hard things are put in our way,
not to stop us, but to call out our
courage and strength.

[Scott Unit 69]

"Landshark" > wrote:
>
>"Dave Hall" > wrote in message
...
>> (Scott Unit 69) wrote:
>> >
>> > > >
>> > My IP hasn't changed either. I know what this is all about - just
>because
>> > I got my ham license and criticized Twist suddenly I am accused of
>forging
>> > by Landshark and others. I always thought better of you Randy but I
see
>I
>> > am wrong.
>>
>>
>> Welcome to the dark side Obi-Wan.
>>
>> Dave
>> "Sandbagger"
>
>
> Unfortunately that's not Scott. He has e mailed me
>and others informing us that this person was forging
>him.

One more time.

I am Scott.

Those emails you are getting are fake or you would post them here.

It is not Ham vs CB but you are making it that way.

[Brainbuster]

Scott Unit 69 wrote in message >...
>
>I don't know what forges you are talking about, Brain, but there are none
>originating from this address.


Please see my other post, where I list the times when you have posted as
Scott, Twist, and me.

[Brainbuster]

Landshark wrote in message ...
>
>"Brainbuster" > wrote in message
...
>> (Scott Unit 69) wrote in message >...
>> >
>> >My IP hasn't changed either.
>>
>> Are you saying the Scott has always used AOL?



I just looked up some old posts from Scott...

Going back to 1999, Scott was using "Home"...

===
From: "Scott (Unit 69)" >
Subject: Re: Wilson vs. Penetrator (1/1)
Date: 1999/10/05
Message-ID: >#1/1
X-Complaints-To:
X-Trace: news.rdc1.md.home.com 939086113 24.3.61.159 (Mon, 04 Oct 1999
18:15:13 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 04 Oct 1999 18:15:13 PDT
Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb
===

Of course, Home.net went under and messages were then through Comcast...

===
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 19:07:44 -0500
Message-ID: >
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 20:07:51 -0400
From: Scott Unit 69 >
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
Newsgroups:
rec.radio.amateur.antenna,rec.radio.amateur.dx,rec .radio.amateur.policy,rec.
radio.shortwave,rec.radio.cb
Subject: CORRECTION!!!
NNTP-Posting-Host: 68.55.6.97
X-Trace:
sv3-5yRttsgyy5FZUC4O6xvS4kTwY7Kp/thk4OdvVQWqCSmI2990bqzasvi2c+gJDufjiEBYWlFD
E0eiLw4!WmVZpmoXtZL+NYiGLHfNtQ0hhkGemjgrHHmCxXwvZk il7AIr
X-Complaints-To:
X-DMCA-Complaints-To:
===


Yet the person claiming to be "Unit 69" is using AOL.


Regards,

Peter.