Re: President George Bush Assasinated

[Tom Randy]

On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:45:19 -0400, NO SPAM wrote:

> "Dan" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:33:38 GMT, wrote:
>>
>> >Early this morning two CNN Journalists discovered the CCTV footage that
> will shock the world. At 3.29am President George Bush was shot dead by an
>>
>> In your dreams.
>>
>> The attachment is an scr screen saver file, and is probably a virus.
>>
>> Dan
>>
>
> Man, WTF, don't these ass holes ever quit? THEY are the ones who should be
> shot. You would think by now, these DUMB ****S would know that the great
> majority are on to their stupid ****.
>
> NS


If that were the case they would bother any more. It's not the case.

I switched to Linux, I got fed up and I'm so glad I did.

[Brenda Ann Dyer]

"-=jd=-" > wrote in message
...
> On Mon 27 Sep 2004 08:32:07p, Tom Randy > wrote in
> message :
>
> > On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 09:45:19 -0400, NO SPAM wrote:
> >
> >> "Dan" > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >>> On Sun, 26 Sep 2004 12:33:38 GMT, wrote:
> >>>
> >>> >Early this morning two CNN Journalists discovered the CCTV footage
> >>> >that
> >> will shock the world. At 3.29am President George Bush was shot dead by
> >> an
> >>>
> >>> In your dreams.
> >>>
> >>> The attachment is an scr screen saver file, and is probably a virus.
> >>>
> >>> Dan
> >>>
> >>
> >> Man, WTF, don't these ass holes ever quit? THEY are the ones who should
> >> be shot. You would think by now, these DUMB ****S would know that the
> >> great majority are on to their stupid ****.
> >>
> >> NS
> >
> >
> > If that were the case they would bother any more. It's not the case.
> >
> > I switched to Linux, I got fed up and I'm so glad I did.
> >
>
>
> Imagine, if you will, Linux "dumbed down" to the point where Gladys-
> Homemaker can use it as easily as Windows. If it was, then it would most
> likely have a larger ID-10T user base. If it had a larger ID-10T user
> base, then it would become attractive to those who would seek to exploit
> the ID-10T users. There's no reason to think "Gladys" wouldn't *still*
> double-click unknown executable email attachments because she simply does
> not know better.
>
> I have no problems with either Windows or *nix - never have and don't
> expect I will. Then again, I'm not a casual user like "Gladys" and I know
> better than poking the unknown mass attached to an email or web page with
> a sharp stick.
>
> I've always thought that if you are comfortable with any given flavor of
> *nix, then Windows should pose no threat, presuming you aren't lazy and
> complacent.

Amen