Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns His "Feeble Five" Crown

[K4YZ]

Frank Gilliland makes a bigger fool of himself by writing:
> You claim that you were never a reservist:

Nope. I never was....Other than my Delayed Entry period.

> "From 03 September 1974 to 29 May 1992 I was on active duty. Nothing
> else."
>
> Source:
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.amateur.policy/msg/9358a82736e89c03?hl=en&

Uh huh.

> Yet you also claim to have served with 1st Batallion 24th Marines:
>
> Source:
> http://web6.military.com/HomePage/UnitPageBulletinBoard/1,13492,500081%7C775810%7CM,00.html

No such "claim" exists, Frankie. Not in that URL, not ANYwhere!

> That unit is part of the 4th Marine Division -- i.e, the Reserves.
> Even the Batallion CO is a Reservist. So either you lied about serving
> with 1/24 or you lied about not being in the Reserves. Since both
> claims are mutually exclusive, at least one of your claims must be
> false.

ANYONE who reads the post I made on the bulletin board of 1/24
will NOT find a SINGLE WORD that says "I served with 1st Batallion 24th
Marines". Not even a HINT.

What they WILL find is a "cc"'d copy of a letter I wrote to the
editor of a paper that had written an article that told of the UAW's
refusal to allow Marines of 1/24 to park their non-US built vehicles on
their lot across from the 1/24 Armory.

Here. Allow me to copy it directly:

QUOTE:

Parking Lot Flap

A Letter To The Editor: Dear Mr. Mayne, I've been searching for a new
vehicle and had been 99% decided on a new Ford Ranger or F-150 even
though I liked the design of a certain foreign truck just because I
wanted to Buy American. Now I will reconsider. And on the bumper of
that new vehicle, whatever it may ultimately be, will be a new bumper
sticker of my own making: UAW can KMA. I am sure the meaning is clear.
Semper Fidelis. STEVEN J ROBESON, LPN Gunnery Sergeant, USMC(ret'd)
Winchester, TN

Posted by Steven Robeson
Mar 18 2005 04:13:44:000AM

UNQUOTE

You're welcome to point out the part that allegedly says "I Was A
Part of the 1st Bn 24th Marines"

The story about the parking lot flap was covered by several of the
on-line news servers and CNN, by the way, Frankie.

Now...WHERE did I allegedly say "I Served With 1stBn 24th
Marines"...?!?!?

And don't you think that if I had made some outlanding claim of
being a member of their unit in MARCH of 2005 that SOMEONE from 1/24
would have responded and said "Who Are You To Claim You Were Ever In
This Unit..?!?!"

> That's absolute proof that you are a liar, Dudly.

No...YOUR attempt to suggest that the "letter to the editor" in
support of the Marines of 1/24 over parking thier non-US built vehicles
in that UAW parking lot is the "absolute proof" that YOU are the liar.


As if more was needed.......

> I do, however, tend to believe that you were a Reservist.

You "believe" that because it serves to fit your stories. It's
still wrong.

> You were
> discharged after 18 years. If you -were- on active duty that would
> mean you were only two years away from retirement with full benefits.
> Not even an idiot would quit with 2 years left.

Since you were not party to the arrangements, Frankie, the only
IDIOT here appears to be you.

> During Desert Storm, 1/24 was sent -not- to Iraq, but to Okinawa:

OK. So?

> Source:
> http://1stbattalion3rdmarines.com/marine-units-histories/24th_marine.htm
>
> You also admit to going to Oki.

Yep. But not in 1990. I was just RETURNING from my last Oki tour
in the spring of 90.

> Source:
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.radio.family/msg/ef93ab392f52965f?hl=en&
> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.cb/msg/e7ccbb9bcdc91a5c?hl=en&

Uh huh. First time with HMH-462 in 1980.

Then again with HMH-363 in 1981. I went back to Oki in 89 with
HMH-363 and cross decked to 361, staying a year.

> Omigosh, looks like you are a closet CBer!!!

Nope.

I've openly addressed using CB radio on numerous occassions. It
has it's uses. I own both 11 meter and FRS radios.

CB was how I met the first Amateur I ever knew and eventually got
into Amateur Radio.

I've never said otherwise.

> Either that or you were
> masquerading as one, which is far more likely. I wonder what your
> hambo buddies think about THAT!!! Anyway.....

Gee, Frankie...Just a couple weeks ago YOU were alluding to being
an "extra"...

Of course you didn't state "extra" WHAT, but then it doesn't
matter.

However almost everyone here (RRAP) has acknowledged some CB radio
use in the past or present.

Your point?

> So Dudly the wannabe-hero gets shipped to Japan while the war is
> happening in the Middle East. Do you feel that you were denied the
> honor and recognition that you think you deserve?

Boy-oh-boy do I see some PROJECTION there!

Frankie, the Twice Court Martialed In One Tour ex-Marine trying
DESPERATELY to make amends withn his own soul for the Marine Corps
career that never happened because he was too irresponsible to do it
right the FIRST time....

> Or were you just denied the opportunity to be a hero?

Funny thing about "heros", Frankie...If you ever get a chance to
talk to one who, by virtue of appropriate award, is what we define as a
"hero", none of them will tell you that what they did was "heroic", nor
did they feel that way before, during or since that event.

I did my job, Frankie, and I did it well. I was never a "poster
Marine", but neither was I Gomer Pyle or a non-hacking little puke like
you. Not even so much as an on-base parking ticket.

> Must have been devastating for
> you, Dud, having to come back and face the same people you lied to
> when you told all those tall tales of your war exploits and acts of
> "uncommon valor".

Whelp...There's yet another point at which you and I diverge, Your
Pukiness. I didn't have to make up any lies to tell. I go just the
other way...I just don't care to talk about it.

> It's so much easier to maintain the lie than to fess
> up and risk losing what little respect you mistakenly think people
> have for you.

I guess I could follow in YOUR (and Lennie's...) footsteps and
just quote from various Clancy novels and USMC manuals in CB and Ham
Radio related newsgroups and wait for the "ooooohs" and "ahhhhhhh" to
start pouring in...

But on the other hand....no.

> Is that why your wife dumped you, Dud? She got tired of
> all the lies? Can't really blame her..... but you did anyway. Always
> someone else's fault, isn't it? Everyone else lies except you, right?

Gee, Frankie...I'm married to the same woman I was married to when
Desert Shield / Desert Storm was happening. Married her BEFORE "The
Storm". We've been through some storms of our own in the meantime.

Where'd you get that "she dumped you" song and dance?

From Markie's posts...?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

(I love it when one Feeble Five idiot depends on another for
"facts"...The results are ALWAYS hillarious!)

> Poor, poor Dudly..... too much pride to admit that his courage was
> never tested, yet too much cowardice to face the consequences of that
> pride. But I'm sure you will find a way to justify this conflict, both
> in the newsgroup and in your own mind. Meanwhile, I'll be back quiet
> and continue watching your emotional meltdown. Enjoy.

No emotional meltdown, Frankie! Just a good, deep-in-the-gut
belly laugh at yet another of your wild ###ed "I Have To Prove I Was A
Better Marine Than Any Marine Ever Was" stories.

Now, go back up and prove to us where I allegedly said I was a
member of 1st Bn 24th Marines and how my letter to the editor about
parking lots is in any way-shape-or-form substantiates your blatant
lies, deceit and bull####.

You're a punk, Frankie, and you just proved it again.

Thanks!

Steve, K4YZ

[nurse police]

"K4YZ" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Frank Gilliland makes a bigger fool of himself by writing:
>> You claim that you were never a reservist:
>
> Nope. I never was....Other than my Delayed Entry period.
>
Uh huh.
>
You suck.

http://i1.tinypic.com/mip8af.jpg

[konstan_@hotmail.com]

On 24 Jan 2006 05:16:03 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

>
>Frank Gilliland makes a bigger fool of himself by writing:
>> You claim that you were never a reservist:
>
> Nope. I never was....Other than my Delayed Entry period.

Bull****
if any of your story is true you are a reservist NOWE
>
>> "From 03 September 1974 to 29 May 1992 I was on active duty. Nothing
>> else."
>>
>> Source:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.amateur.policy/msg/9358a82736e89c03?hl=en&

no proof thaere
>
> Uh huh.
>
>> Yet you also claim to have served with 1st Batallion 24th Marines:
>>
>> Source:
>> http://web6.military.com/HomePage/UnitPageBulletinBoard/1,13492,500081%7C775810%7CM,00.html
>

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[an old friend]

wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2006 05:16:03 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
>
> >
> >Frank Gilliland makes a bigger fool of himself by writing:
> >> You claim that you were never a reservist:
> >
> > Nope. I never was....Other than my Delayed Entry period.
>
Bull****
if any of your story is true you are a reservist NOW

[K4YZ]

an old friend wrote:
> wrote:
> > On 24 Jan 2006 05:16:03 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> > >Frank Gilliland makes a bigger fool of himself by writing:
> > >> You claim that you were never a reservist:
> > >
> > > Nope. I never was....Other than my Delayed Entry period.
> >
> Bull####
>
> if any of your story is true you are a reservist NOW

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! ! ! ! !

What a HOOT, Markie!

I'll sit back and watch you explain THAT one!

Steve, K4YZ

[an old friend]

K4YZ wrote:Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
His "Feeble Five" Crown
> an old friend wrote:
seems not

[K4YZ]

an old friend wrote:
> K4YZ wrote:
Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> > an old friend wrote:
> seems not

Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
have defied common sense.

But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.

Steve, K4YZ

[Frank Gilliland]

On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
om>:

>
>an old friend wrote:
>> K4YZ wrote:
>Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
>> His "Feeble Five" Crown
>> > an old friend wrote:
>> seems not
>
> Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
>day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
>phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
>have defied common sense.


Hence your familiarity with the phrase.


> But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
>
>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[jim]

Frank Gilliland wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> om>:
>
>
>>an old friend wrote:
>>
>>>K4YZ wrote:
>>
>>Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
>>
>>>His "Feeble Five" Crown
>>>
>>>>an old friend wrote:
>>>
>>>seems not
>>
>> Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
>>day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
>>phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
>>have defied common sense.
>
>
>
> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
>
>
>
>> But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
>>
>>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ
>
>
>
> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
> http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
> ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
C'mon Frank, why lower yourself to answer the crap the idiot posts? It
was hoped the old threads were buried yet he posts again trying to get a
rise. Ignore the prick and do us all a favor.

[Frank Gilliland]

On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:14:13 -0500, jim > wrote
in >:

<snip>
>C'mon Frank, why lower yourself to answer the crap the idiot posts? It
>was hoped the old threads were buried yet he posts again trying to get a
>rise. Ignore the prick and do us all a favor.


Your suggestion might carry more weight if you were preaching to both
side of the isle, Jim.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[K4YZ]

Frank Gilliland wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> om>:
> >an old friend wrote:
> >> K4YZ wrote:
> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> >> > an old friend wrote:
> >> seems not
> >
> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> >have defied common sense.
>
> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
>
> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> >
> >Steve, K4YZ
>
> Who's your lawyer, Dud?

Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!

Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.

Sheeeeeeesh.

I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
stupidity by now...

But it appears you ahve a lot more of it to spread around.

Steve, K4YZ

[K4YZ]

Frank Gilliland wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:14:13 -0500, jim > wrote
> in >:
>
> <snip>
> >C'mon Frank, why lower yourself to answer the crap the idiot posts? It
> >was hoped the old threads were buried yet he posts again trying to get a
> >rise. Ignore the ##### and do us all a favor.
>
> Your suggestion might carry more weight if you were preaching to both
> side of the isle, Jim.

The "idiot" is the one making "assertions of fact" that are not
factual, "Jim", ie: Miss Silliland's assertions that I "claimed" to be
a member of a USMC Reserve unit that I was never a member of just
because I posted a note on a bulletin board they run.

And the "old threads (that) were buried" were dreged up by your
Miss Silliland herself.

I had not directed a post to Silliland...She opened that round.

So if you want to address "idiots" and #####'s, Silliland is the
one you need to direct ALL your comments to.

Steve, K4YZ

[an_old_friend]

likely never

[jonz]

"K4YZ" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> Frank Gilliland wrote:
> > On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> > om>:
> > >an old friend wrote:
> > >> K4YZ wrote:
> > >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> > >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> > >> > an old friend wrote:
> > >> seems not
> > >
> > > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> > >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> > >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> > >have defied common sense.
> >
> > Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
> >
> > > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> > >
> > >Steve, K4YZ
> >
> > Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>
> Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>
> Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
> I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
> FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>
> Sheeeeeeesh.
>
> I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
> stupidity by now...
>
> But it appears you ahve a lot more of it to spread around.
>
> Steve, K4YZ
>

boring boring boring..........why dont you old hasbeens, couldabeens..but
probly neverbeens... take ya **** ,and **** off to ya councillers with
it.......NOBODY GIVES A ****!!!!!!!!!!!!YA SILLY OLD
****S.............GEEZ............j

[K4YZ]

jonz wrote:

> boring boring boring..........why dont you old hasbeens, couldabeens..but
> probly neverbeens... take ya #### ,and #### off to ya councillers with
> it.......NOBODY GIVES A ####!!!!!!!!!!!!YA SILLY OLD
> ######.............GEEZ............j

Obviously YOU cared enough to write a response, as profane and
feeble mimded as it was, ergo making a mockery of your own opinion.

Putz.

Steve, K4YZ

[acryfordecency@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 25 Jan 2006 03:54:26 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

>
>jonz wrote:
>
>> boring boring boring..........why dont you old hasbeens, couldabeens..but
>> probly neverbeens... take ya #### ,and #### off to ya councillers with
>> it.......NOBODY GIVES A ####!!!!!!!!!!!!YA SILLY OLD
>> ######.............GEEZ............j
>
> Obviously YOU cared enough to write a response, as profane and
>feeble mimded as it was, ergo making a mockery of your own opinion.
>
> Putz.

curious that after your censorship the only profanity is your own
>
>Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[Landshark]

"Frank Gilliland" > wrote in message
...
> On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:14:13 -0500, jim > wrote
> in >:
>
> <snip>
>>C'mon Frank, why lower yourself to answer the crap the idiot posts? It
>>was hoped the old threads were buried yet he posts again trying to get a
>>rise. Ignore the prick and do us all a favor.
>
>
> Your suggestion might carry more weight if you were preaching to both
> side of the isle, Jim.

I'm sure he would if he thought it would do any good. His point is....
you are better than them Frank, they are nothing but trolls.
Congrats on the Seahawks, I'm picking the Steelers to win, but
either way it's going to be a good game.

Landshark


--
The internet is fun but it's no substitute for books, people, nature,
or direct experiences. But you think that you can get everything you
need from your computer, you are a fool.

Frank Gililland

[acryfordecency@Mark.Morgan.com]

On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 20:28:14 +1100, "jonz" >
wrote:

>
>"K4YZ" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>>
>> Frank Gilliland wrote:
>> > On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> > om>:
>> > >an old friend wrote:
>> > >> K4YZ wrote:
>> > >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
>> > >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
>> > >> > an old friend wrote:
>> > >> seems not
>> > >
>> > > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
>> > >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
>> > >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
>> > >have defied common sense.
>> >
>> > Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
>> >
>> > > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
>> > >
>> > >Steve, K4YZ
>> >
>> > Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>>
>> Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>>
>> Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
>> I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
>> FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>>
>> Sheeeeeeesh.
>>
>> I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
>> stupidity by now...
>>
>> But it appears you ahve a lot more of it to spread around.
>>
>> Steve, K4YZ
>>
>
> boring boring boring..........why dont you old hasbeens, couldabeens..but
>probly neverbeens... take ya **** ,and **** off to ya councillers with
>it.......NOBODY GIVES A ****!!!!!!!!!!!!YA SILLY OLD
>****S.............GEEZ............j

Steve is sader than that, he is a "Thinks he was"
>

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[Frank Gilliland]

On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
. com>:

>
>Frank Gilliland wrote:
>> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> om>:
>> >an old friend wrote:
>> >> K4YZ wrote:
>> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
>> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
>> >> > an old friend wrote:
>> >> seems not
>> >
>> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
>> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
>> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
>> >have defied common sense.
>>
>> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
>>
>> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
>> >
>> >Steve, K4YZ
>>
>> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>
> Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!


Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.


> Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
>I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
>FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.


Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
you never served at all. It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
fail to amuse.


> Sheeeeeeesh.
>
> I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
>stupidity by now...
>
> But it appears you ahve a lot more of it to spread around.
>
>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[K4YZ]

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> . com>:
> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> >> om>:
> >> >an old friend wrote:
> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
> >> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> >> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> >> >> > an old friend wrote:
> >> >> seems not
> >> >
> >> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> >> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> >> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> >> >have defied common sense.
> >>
> >> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
> >>
> >> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> >> >
> >> >Steve, K4YZ
> >>
> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> >
> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>
> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.

Imaginary?

His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
aparition.

> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>
> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
> you never served at all.

But WAIT a minute...

YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
service...?!?!

Seems you're very confused.

Most liars of your character are, though.

And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
military matters as you, NOT factual.

> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
> fail to amuse.

Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...

LIke the one you just threw together this past week.

And Frankie...You didn't "rattle" anything...You just proved once
again that you are the liar I am calling you. No facts...No proof...No
truth...

And the amusing part is seeing what tales of deception you can
come up with next to try and perpetuate your acts of deceit.

No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.

> > Sheeeeeeesh.
> >
> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
> >stupidity by now...
> >
> > But it appears you have a lot more of it to spread around.

As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with
your own stupidity.

And you have a lot to spread around...

Steve, K4YZ

[Frank Gilliland]

On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
. com>:

>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> . com>:
>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> >> om>:
>> >> >an old friend wrote:
>> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
>> >> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
>> >> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
>> >> >> > an old friend wrote:
>> >> >> seems not
>> >> >
>> >> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
>> >> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
>> >> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
>> >> >have defied common sense.
>> >>
>> >> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
>> >>
>> >> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
>> >> >
>> >> >Steve, K4YZ
>> >>
>> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>> >
>> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>>
>> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
>
> Imaginary?
>
> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
>aparition.


"apparition"


>> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
>> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
>> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>>
>> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
>> you never served at all.
>
> But WAIT a minute...
>
> YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
>service...?!?!
>
> Seems you're very confused.


Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
so was your response.


> Most liars of your character are, though.
>
> And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
>statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
>military matters as you, NOT factual.


Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.


>> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
>> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
>> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
>> fail to amuse.
>
> Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...


Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
existence.


> LIke the one you just threw together this past week.
>
> And Frankie...You didn't "rattle" anything...You just proved once
>again that you are the liar I am calling you. No facts...No proof...No
>truth...
>
> And the amusing part is seeing what tales of deception you can
>come up with next to try and perpetuate your acts of deceit.
>
> No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.


I served. You didn't. That's a fact.


>> > Sheeeeeeesh.
>> >
>> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
>> >stupidity by now...
>> >
>> > But it appears you have a lot more of it to spread around.
>
> As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with
>your own stupidity.
>
> And you have a lot to spread around...
>
>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[K4YZ]

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> . com>:
> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, > wrote in
> >> . com>:
> >> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, > wrote in
> >> >> om>:
> >> >> >an old friend wrote:
> >> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
> >> >> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> >> >> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> >> >> >> > an old friend wrote:
> >> >> >> seems not
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> >> >> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> >> >> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> >> >> >have defied common sense.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
> >> >>
> >> >> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Steve, K4YZ
> >> >>
> >> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> >> >
> >> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
> >>
> >> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
> >
> > Imaginary?
> >
> > His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
> >aparition.
>
> "apparition"

Thanks. But my one letter mispelling was still more accurate than
your recent posts.

> >> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
> >> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
> >> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
> >>
> >> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
> >> you never served at all.
> >
> > But WAIT a minute...
> >
> > YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
> >service...?!?!
> >
> > Seems you're very confused.
>
> Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
> trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
> in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
> writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
> so was your response.

What you did was blatantly lie. You made statements as fat that
were ANYthing but fact, and in the process proved to all herein that
Frank Gilliland IS the liar I accuse him of being.

It's not the first time you've been caught, and I dare say the
last.

As for fun, I guess you DO like getting slapped around. I don't
know many people who would describe having been caught lying in an
open, public forum as "fun", but then I guess that's what spins your
propeller.

> > Most liars of your character are, though.
> >
> > And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
> >statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
> >military matters as you, NOT factual.
>
> Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.

They are facts.

> >> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
> >> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
> >> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
> >> fail to amuse.
> >
> > Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
>
> Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
> existence.

They don't.

I just take a certain amount of pride in having served in the
United States Marines, and it's humiliating in no small amount to see
someone who wore the same uniform so flagrantly and unabashedly defile
both that uniform and himself.

> > LIke the one you just threw together this past week.
> >
> > And Frankie...You didn't "rattle" anything...You just proved once
> >again that you are the liar I am calling you. No facts...No proof...No
> >truth...
> >
> > And the amusing part is seeing what tales of deception you can
> >come up with next to try and perpetuate your acts of deceit.
> >
> > No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.
>
> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.

I served. Honorably. You didn't. THAT is a fact.

> >> > Sheeeeeeesh.
> >> >
> >> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
> >> >stupidity by now...
> >> >
> >> > But it appears you have a lot more of it to spread around.
> >
> > As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with
> >your own stupidity.
> >
> > And you have a lot to spread around...

And around and around and around......

Steve, K4YZ

[an_old_friend]

K4YZ wrote:
> Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> > . com>:
> > >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > >> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, > wrote in
> > >> . com>:
> > >> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > >> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, > wrote in
> > >> >> om>:
> > >> >> >an old friend wrote:
> > >> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
> > >> >> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> > >> >> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> > >> >> >> > an old friend wrote:
> > >> >> >> seems not
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> > >> >> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> > >> >> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> > >> >> >have defied common sense.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> > >> >> >
> > >> >> >Steve, K4YZ
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> > >> >
> > >> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
> > >>
> > >> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
> > >
> > > Imaginary?
> > >
> > > His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
> > >aparition.
> >
> > "apparition"
>
> Thanks. But my one letter mispelling was still more accurate than
> your recent posts.

nope they are not
>
> > >> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
> > >> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
> > >> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
> > >>
> > >> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
> > >> you never served at all.
> > >
> > > But WAIT a minute...
> > >
> > > YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
> > >service...?!?!
> > >
> > > Seems you're very confused.
> >
> > Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
> > trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
> > in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
> > writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
> > so was your response.
>
> What you did was blatantly lie.
did he?

so what

you blantanly lie all the time

why do you have that preveledge alone
> You made statements as fat that

He has made not statements as "fat"

you lied again
> were ANYthing but fact, and in the process proved to all herein that
> Frank Gilliland IS the liar I accuse him of being.

everybody lies steve indeed it has been written that society could not
funtcion if people told the truth the whole truth and nothing but the
truth

>
> It's not the first time you've been caught, and I dare say the
> last.
>
> As for fun, I guess you DO like getting slapped around.
more of your passion for violence
> I don't
> know many people who would describe having been caught lying in an
> open, public forum as "fun", but then I guess that's what spins your
> propeller.
>
> > > Most liars of your character are, though.
> > >
> > > And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
> > >statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
> > >military matters as you, NOT factual.
> >
> > Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.
>
> They are facts.

not according those that know
>
> > >> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
> > >> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
> > >> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
> > >> fail to amuse.
> > >
> > > Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
> >
> > Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
> > existence.
>
> They don't.

and yet you conitue to respond to them as if they do
>
> I just take a certain amount of pride in having served in the
> United States Marines,
prove it

>and it's humiliating in no small amount to see
> someone who wore the same uniform so flagrantly and unabashedly defile
> both that uniform and himself.

then grow up
>
> > > LIke the one you just threw together this past week.
> > >
> > > And Frankie...You didn't "rattle" anything...You just proved once
> > >again that you are the liar I am calling you. No facts...No proof...No
> > >truth...
> > >
> > > And the amusing part is seeing what tales of deception you can
> > >come up with next to try and perpetuate your acts of deceit.
> > >
> > > No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.
> >
> > I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>
> I served.
prove it
> Honorably.
prove it

> You didn't. THAT is a fact.

>
> > >> > Sheeeeeeesh.
> > >> >
> > >> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
> > >> >stupidity by now...
> > >> >
> > >> > But it appears you have a lot more of it to spread around.
> > >
> > > As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with
> > >your own stupidity.
> > >
> > > And you have a lot to spread around...
>
> And around and around and around......

and yet you rise to the bait everytime

paranoid and OCD is what you are

and a pathological liar since you have led to yourself so throughly you
can no longer tell the truth fro the lies
>
> Steve, K4YZ

[Frank Gilliland]

On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
. com>:

<snip>
>> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>
> I served. Honorably.


Prove it.


> You didn't. THAT is a fact.


That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
your Honorable Discharge certificate.


>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[jim]

Landshark wrote:
> "Frank Gilliland" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:14:13 -0500, jim > wrote
>>in >:
>>
>><snip>
>>
>>>C'mon Frank, why lower yourself to answer the crap the idiot posts? It
>>>was hoped the old threads were buried yet he posts again trying to get a
>>>rise. Ignore the prick and do us all a favor.
>>
>>
>>Your suggestion might carry more weight if you were preaching to both
>>side of the isle, Jim.
>
>
> I'm sure he would if he thought it would do any good. His point is....
> you are better than them Frank, they are nothing but trolls.
> Congrats on the Seahawks, I'm picking the Steelers to win, but
> either way it's going to be a good game.
>
> Landshark
>
>
agreed sharkie but what amazes me is that this line of accusations
resurfaces after it was hoped it was finally put to rest. Ho Hummmm

[LenAnderson@ieee.org]

From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am

>On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
>>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>>> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>>> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>>> >> >an old friend wrote:
>>> >> >> K4YZ wrote:


>>> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>
>>> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>
>>> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
>
>> Imaginary?
>
>> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
>>aparition.
>
>"apparition"

Ghoul friend? :-)


>>> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
>>> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
>>> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>
>>> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
>>> you never served at all.
>
>> But WAIT a minute...
>
>> YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
>>service...?!?!
>
>> Seems you're very confused.
>
>Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
>trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
>in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
>writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
>so was your response.

If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
the outrage to handle it all... :-)


>> Most liars of your character are, though.
>
>> And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
>>statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
>>military matters as you, NOT factual.
>
>Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.

The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...


>>> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
>>> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
>>> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
>>> fail to amuse.
>
>> Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
>
>Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
>existence.

They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)

Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."


>> No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.
>
>I served. You didn't. That's a fact.

All that Dudly produces for "proof of his active-duty service"
is a lot of blustery name-calling of his challengers. He hopes
to keep all thinking about his "lying challengers" in order to
weasel out of producing any tangible proof.

His DD-214 copy is nowhere to be seen.

Anything in the way of photographs of 18 years of "service" is
nowhere to be seen.

Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
of "service" is nowhere to be seen.



>>> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
>>> >stupidity by now...

"Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.


>Who's your lawyer, Dud?

He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)

Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?

[LenAnderson@ieee.org]

From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 3:39 pm

>On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in


><snip>
>
>>> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>
>> I served. Honorably.
>
>Prove it.

He CAN'T, Frank. He hasn't yet shown a single bit of documentation
or personal mememto/photo of his "active-duty time" that was
supposed to be an 18-year USMC career.


>That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
>of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
>Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
>your Honorable Discharge certificate.

Give it up, Frank. Dudly hasn't got one of those, either.

He is continuing to BLUFF and bluster about his "active-duty"
career to try to "sell" everyone that he really did it. He
didn't.


>>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ
>
>Who's your lawyer, Dud?

He probably thinks John Houseman will appear from the other
side and "defend" him. :-)

[DrDeath]

> wrote in message oups.com...

How about keeping this **** on rec.radio.amateur.policy Nobody gives a **** about Frank on rec.radio.cb

[K4YZ]

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> . com>:
>
> <snip>
> >> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
> >
> > I served. Honorably.
>
> Prove it.

Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public
resources provided is not my problem.

> > You didn't. THAT is a fact.
>
> That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
> of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
> Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
> your Honorable Discharge certificate.

Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half
promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably.

And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim
you know so well to verify my service.

That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver
North yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies
of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be.

Again.

Steve, K4YZ

[an_old_friend]

K4YZ wrote:
> Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> > . com>:
> >
> > <snip>
> > >> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
> > >
> > > I served. Honorably.
> >
> > Prove it.
>
> Done already.

nope you have never proven your service

you have occasionaly given info that might lead somebody to such proof
but even if they are doing the work it is imcomplete

>That you wuss out on following up on the public
> resources provided is not my problem.

why do you calim the sole right to lie on RRAP?

[Frank Gilliland]

On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
. com>:

>
>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
>> . com>:
>>
>> <snip>
>> >> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>> >
>> > I served. Honorably.
>>
>> Prove it.
>
> Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public
>resources provided is not my problem.


Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
work now.


>> > You didn't. THAT is a fact.
>>
>> That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
>> of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
>> Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
>> your Honorable Discharge certificate.
>
> Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half
>promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably.


Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion.


> And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim
>you know so well to verify my service.


As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources
at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your
alleged service.


> That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver
>North


I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic
before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.


> yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies
>of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be.
>
> Again.


And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who
served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I
formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite.
But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your
inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it
demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter
stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap.


>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones?

Oh yeah..... who's your lawyer, Dud?








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

K4YZ wrote:
> Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> > . com>:
> > >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> > >> om>:
> > >> >an old friend wrote:
> > >> >> K4YZ wrote:
> > >> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> > >> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> > >> >> > an old friend wrote:
> > >> >> seems not
> > >> >
> > >> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> > >> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> > >> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> > >> >have defied common sense.
> > >>
> > >> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
> > >>
> > >> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> > >> >
> > >> >Steve, K4YZ
> > >>
> > >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> > >
> > > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
> >
> > Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
>
> Imaginary?
>
> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
> aparition.

Why do you bring his wife and her sleeping habits into the fray?

Do you think it's appropriate?

It'll be interesting to see how well you do in court once he see's that
you brought his wife into this.

> As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with
> your own stupidity.

Speaking about stupidity...

> And you have a lot to spread around...
>
> Steve, K4YZ

Yep, you sure spread it on thick.

Talking about your attorney's wife in a forum like this? You just
needed to show everyone how tight you're in with your new Upper
Peninsula attorney and his wife, didn't ja?

Always needing time with other people's wives, I see.

So Steve, who's your attorney?

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 3:39 pm
>
> >On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
>
>
> ><snip>
> >
> >>> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
> >
> >> I served. Honorably.
> >
> >Prove it.
>
> He CAN'T, Frank. He hasn't yet shown a single bit of documentation
> or personal mememto/photo of his "active-duty time" that was
> supposed to be an 18-year USMC career.
>
>
> >That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
> >of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
> >Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
> >your Honorable Discharge certificate.
>
> Give it up, Frank. Dudly hasn't got one of those, either.

Maybe I could type up one of those old Air Force certificate's of
thanks. Thanking him that he isn't claiming an association with the AF.

[acryfordecency2@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 26 Jan 2006 14:16:08 -0800, wrote:

>
wrote:
>> From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 3:39 pm
>>
>> >On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
>>
>>
>> ><snip>
>> >
>> >>> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>> >
>> >> I served. Honorably.
>> >
>> >Prove it.
>>
>> He CAN'T, Frank. He hasn't yet shown a single bit of documentation
>> or personal mememto/photo of his "active-duty time" that was
>> supposed to be an 18-year USMC career.
>>
>>
>> >That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
>> >of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
>> >Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
>> >your Honorable Discharge certificate.
>>
>> Give it up, Frank. Dudly hasn't got one of those, either.
>
>Maybe I could type up one of those old Air Force certificate's of
>thanks. Thanking him that he isn't claiming an association with the AF.

and maybe Hans the navy and myslf the army jeff the cooast grard maybe

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[DrDeath]

"Lancer" > wrote in message
news:8mset1dpm1ifovoqdaqp8rdvkno0t6u4s2@2355323778 ...
> There was a Steven J. Robeson, that was in charge of burning cans of
> ****. Could he be the same one?
>
See how the government wastes our resources. There are countries wishing
they had cans of **** and here we are burning it.

[K4YZ]

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> . com>:
> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >> On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> >> . com>:
> >>
> >> <snip>
> >> >> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
> >> >
> >> > I served. Honorably.
> >>
> >> Prove it.
> >
> > Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public
> >resources provided is not my problem.
>
> Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
> serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
> work now.

It doesn't matter what YOU think.

Oh...BTW...There was a pictorial article in the MAG-16 newspaper
in 1988 for one of my CG Certificate's of Commendation for
lifesaving...A Lance Corporal put his arm through a window and I
managed to keep him from bleeding to death.

You're welcome to find your OWN excuse as for how it happens to be
the same "Steven J Robeson" that appears on my AOL and QRZ sites,
Frankie.

> >> > You didn't. THAT is a fact.
> >>
> >> That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
> >> of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
> >> Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
> >> your Honorable Discharge certificate.
> >
> > Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half
> >promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably.
>
> Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion.

Obviously not.

They wouldn't let you stay in the Corps. (Here comes FRANKIE'S
excuses now...He's always alleging OTHERS have "excuses...Let's see
his...)

> > And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim
> >you know so well to verify my service.
>
> As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources
> at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your
> alleged service.


Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight............. ....................................

> > That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver
> >North
>
> I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic
> before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.

Sure you did.

Why do you set yourself up as a li....Oh...wait...You already ARE
a liar...

Never mind.

> > yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies
> >of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be.
> >
> > Again.
>
> And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who
> served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I
> formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite.
> But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your
> inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it
> demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter
> stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap.

I understand fine.

You make excuses then whine about people making excuses.

I have no doubt that it was that whining that helped seal your fate
in the Corps.

> I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones?

I don't need "excuses", Frankie. I have facts. That you try to
pooh-pooh them off is YOUR "excuse".

And, like you, a poor excuse it is, too.

Steve, K4YZ

[an_old_friend]

K4YZ wrote:
> Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
cut
> > Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
> > serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
> > work now.
>
> It doesn't matter what YOU think.
obviously you care very much

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> K4YZ wrote:
> > Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > > On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> > > . com>:
> > > >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> > > >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> > > >> om>:
> > > >> >an old friend wrote:
> > > >> >> K4YZ wrote:
> > > >> >Re: Frankie of Silliland Screws The Pooch Again And Earns
> > > >> >> His "Feeble Five" Crown
> > > >> >> > an old friend wrote:
> > > >> >> seems not
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Seems you've proven MY assertions about your having never spent a
> > > >> >day in a uniform of the Armed Forces. "Screwed the pooch" is a common
> > > >> >phrase for having done something so obviously stupid or so royaly as to
> > > >> >have defied common sense.
> > > >>
> > > >> Hence your familiarity with the phrase.
> > > >>
> > > >> > But then, you ARE one of the Feeble Five yourself.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >Steve, K4YZ
> > > >>
> > > >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> > > >
> > > > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
> > >
> > > Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
> >
> > Imaginary?
> >
> > His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
> > aparition.
>
> Why do you bring his wife and her sleeping habits into the fray?
>
> Do you think it's appropriate?
>
> It'll be interesting to see how well you do in court once he see's that
> you brought his wife into this.
>
> > As I said...seems you are enjoying getting slapped around with
> > your own stupidity.
>
> Speaking about stupidity...
>
> > And you have a lot to spread around...
> >
> > Steve, K4YZ
>
> Yep, you sure spread it on thick.
>
> Talking about your attorney's wife in a forum like this? You just
> needed to show everyone how tight you're in with your new Upper
> Peninsula attorney and his wife, didn't ja?
>
> Always needing time with other people's wives, I see.
>
> So Steve, who's your attorney?

So Steve, who's your attorney?

[Frank Gilliland]

On 27 Jan 2006 07:27:25 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
. com>:

>
>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> On 26 Jan 2006 00:43:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> . com>:
>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> >> On 25 Jan 2006 10:32:41 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> >> . com>:
>> >>
>> >> <snip>
>> >> >> I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>> >> >
>> >> > I served. Honorably.
>> >>
>> >> Prove it.
>> >
>> > Done already. That you wuss out on following up on the public
>> >resources provided is not my problem.
>>
>> Your "resources" do not prove that you are the Gunny Robeson who -did-
>> serve. You tried that excuse before. It didn't work then and it won't
>> work now.
>
> It doesn't matter what YOU think.


Yet you are compelled to reply to my posts. Quite the paradox, Dud.


> Oh...BTW...There was a pictorial article in the MAG-16 newspaper
>in 1988 for one of my CG Certificate's of Commendation for
>lifesaving...A Lance Corporal put his arm through a window and I
>managed to keep him from bleeding to death.


Gee, let me stroll on down to 7-11 and see if they have it on the
rack.....


> You're welcome to find your OWN excuse as for how it happens to be
>the same "Steven J Robeson" that appears on my AOL and QRZ sites,
>Frankie.


You make more than enough excuses for your ignorance about your
alleged MOS and lack of any proof of your alleged service.


>> >> > You didn't. THAT is a fact.
>> >>
>> >> That is your OPINION, an opinion which isn't shared by the same branch
>> >> of the US military that issued my Honorable Discharge certificate.
>> >> Where's your's, Dud? Heck, forget the DD-214 -- just scan and post
>> >> your Honorable Discharge certificate.
>> >
>> > Sorry, Frankie...Any punk that can "brag" about two and a half
>> >promotions to Lance Corporal in ONE tour did not serve honorably.
>>
>> Again, that's your OPINION, and it's only YOUR opinion.
>
> Obviously not.
>
> They wouldn't let you stay in the Corps. (Here comes FRANKIE'S
>excuses now...He's always alleging OTHERS have "excuses...Let's see
>his...)


Excuse for what? Your ignorance about the information on a DD-214
(after you claimed to have several of them)?


>> > And you're still a wuss for not following the resources you claim
>> >you know so well to verify my service.
>>
>> As I have said before (several times), you have just as many resources
>> at your disposal as I do. And I can't find anything that verifies your
>> alleged service.
>
>
>Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight............. ....................................


Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeft..........

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiight..........

Leeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eeeeeeeeeeft..........

Quick-time, harch!


>> > That you insinuate such a buddy-buddy relationship with Oliver
>> >North
>>
>> I never said I had any such relationship. You tried that tactic
>> before. It didn't work then and it won't work now.
>
> Sure you did.


We've been through this before, Dud. Your excuse -then- was that I
"implied" such a relationship existed, yet you never did respond to my
reply where I quoted my own post on the subject. Maybe your ISP sucks
and you didn't get the post -- shall I post it again?


> Why do you set yourself up as a li....Oh...wait...You already ARE
>a liar...
>
> Never mind.
>
>> > yet can't seem to find a copy of the SNCO boards in back copies
>> >of Navy Times pretty well sets you up as the liar I claim you to be.
>> >
>> > Again.
>>
>> And again, I have no doubt that there was a Steven J. Robeson who
>> served in the USMC for about 18 years. I also have no doubt, and I
>> formally concede, that his name appears in the publications you cite.
>> But once again, you have provide no proof that you are him. Your
>> inability to comprehend such a simple concept is remarkable in that it
>> demonstrates desperation in your evasiveness, as well as utter
>> stupidity for thinking that anyone would actually believe such crap.
>
> I understand fine.


Yet you obfuscate the issue as follows:


> You make excuses then whine about people making excuses.
>
> I have no doubt that it was that whining that helped seal your fate
>in the Corps.


Obviously you -don't- understand.


>> I'm getting tired of your old excuses -- got any new ones?
>
> I don't need "excuses", Frankie. I have facts.


Where?


> That you try to
>pooh-pooh them off is YOUR "excuse".
>
> And, like you, a poor excuse it is, too.


My only "excuse" is that your "facts" can't be verified. Feel free to
spin that any way you want.


>Steve "Yellow Dog" Robeson, K4YZ


Who's your lawyer, Dud?









----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am
>
> >On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> >>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >>> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> >>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >>> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> >>> >> >an old friend wrote:
> >>> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
>
>
> >>> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> >
> >>> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
> >
> >>> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
> >
> >> Imaginary?
> >
> >> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
> >>aparition.
> >
> >"apparition"
>
> Ghoul friend? :-)

He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his
new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is
stupid.

> >>> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
> >>> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
> >>> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
> >
> >>> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
> >>> you never served at all.
> >
> >> But WAIT a minute...
> >
> >> YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
> >>service...?!?!
> >
> >> Seems you're very confused.
> >
> >Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
> >trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
> >in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
> >writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
> >so was your response.
>
> If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
> the outrage to handle it all... :-)

May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone
I've ever seen.

> >> Most liars of your character are, though.
> >
> >> And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
> >>statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
> >>military matters as you, NOT factual.
> >
> >Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.
>
> The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...

Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on
the outside of the glove.

> >>> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
> >>> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
> >>> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
> >>> fail to amuse.
> >
> >> Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
> >
> >Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
> >existence.
>
> They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)
>
> Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
> up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."

I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance
corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50
years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there
began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years
of imprisonment and $10,000 fine.

And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When
and where for starters.

> >> No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.
> >
> >I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>
> All that Dudly produces for "proof of his active-duty service"
> is a lot of blustery name-calling of his challengers. He hopes
> to keep all thinking about his "lying challengers" in order to
> weasel out of producing any tangible proof.
>
> His DD-214 copy is nowhere to be seen.
>
> Anything in the way of photographs of 18 years of "service" is
> nowhere to be seen.
>
> Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
> of "service" is nowhere to be seen.
>
Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who
always was someplace else when the going got tuff.
>
> >>> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
> >>> >stupidity by now...
>
> "Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
> ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
> wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.

Nowhere to be seen.

> >Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>
> He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)

Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.

Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?

> Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
> He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
> credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
> all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?
>
>

Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you,
and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting.

All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
his despicable claims. Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).

How you been, Len?

bb

[acryfordecency2@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 28 Jan 2006 11:08:43 -0800, wrote:

>
wrote:
>> From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am
>>
>> >On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
>> >>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> >>> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> >>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> >>> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> >>> >> >an old friend wrote:
>> >>> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
>>
>>
>> >>> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>> >
>> >>> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>> >
>> >>> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
>> >
>> >> Imaginary?
>> >
>> >> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
>> >>aparition.
>> >
>> >"apparition"
>>
>> Ghoul friend? :-)
>
>He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his
>new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is
>stupid.
>
>> >>> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
>> >>> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
>> >>> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>> >
>> >>> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
>> >>> you never served at all.
>> >
>> >> But WAIT a minute...
>> >
>> >> YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
>> >>service...?!?!
>> >
>> >> Seems you're very confused.
>> >
>> >Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
>> >trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
>> >in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
>> >writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
>> >so was your response.
>>
>> If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
>> the outrage to handle it all... :-)
>
>May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone
>I've ever seen.
>
>> >> Most liars of your character are, though.
>> >
>> >> And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
>> >>statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
>> >>military matters as you, NOT factual.
>> >
>> >Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.
>>
>> The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...
>
>Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on
>the outside of the glove.
>
>> >>> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
>> >>> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
>> >>> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
>> >>> fail to amuse.
>> >
>> >> Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
>> >
>> >Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
>> >existence.
>>
>> They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)
>>
>> Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
>> up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."
>
>I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance
>corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50
>years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there
>began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years
>of imprisonment and $10,000 fine.
>
>And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When
>and where for starters.
>
>> >> No wonder you were busted twice. You deserved it.
>> >
>> >I served. You didn't. That's a fact.
>>
>> All that Dudly produces for "proof of his active-duty service"
>> is a lot of blustery name-calling of his challengers. He hopes
>> to keep all thinking about his "lying challengers" in order to
>> weasel out of producing any tangible proof.
>>
>> His DD-214 copy is nowhere to be seen.
>>
>> Anything in the way of photographs of 18 years of "service" is
>> nowhere to be seen.
>>
>> Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
>> of "service" is nowhere to be seen.
>>
>Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who
>always was someplace else when the going got tuff.
>>
>> >>> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
>> >>> >stupidity by now...
>>
>> "Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
>> ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
>> wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.
>
>Nowhere to be seen.
>
>> >Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>>
>> He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)
>
>Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.
>
>Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?
>
>> Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
>> He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
>> credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
>> all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?
>>
>>
>
>Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you,
>and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting.
>
>All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
>needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
>his despicable claims.
gee I thought you wanted to slwo steve posting not kick t into high
gear

Imagine the torent of abuse that would fill all those "apologies"

I don't think we could take deviling such online apologies to all
the people his has offened over the years
> Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
>stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
>sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
>terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
>what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).
>
>How you been, Len?
>
>bb

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2006 11:08:43 -0800, wrote:
>
> >All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
> >needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
> >his despicable claims.

> gee I thought you wanted to slwo steve posting not kick t into high
> gear

For a moment I'll reply as if I were a PCTA EXtra, "I am not
responsible for what Steve does."

> Imagine the torent of abuse that would fill all those "apologies"

I don't think Google has the capacity.

> I don't think we could take deviling such online apologies to all
> the people his has offened over the years

Sorry. I didn't think it through.

[K4YZ]

Steveo wrote:

> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
> to rrcb when you #### yourself?

The fool here is Frankie.

> Go to his house and beat his ###, or shut the #### up, please.

You're cordially invited to follow your own advice, Zero.
Especially the part about "shut(ing) the #### up.

No 73 for you. You're a putz.

Steve, K4YZ

[acryfordecency2@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

>
>Steveo wrote:
>
>> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
>> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
>> to rrcb when you ass of yourself?
>
> The fool here is Frankie.

how so

if he is you have never shown it such

nor does your reponse have any real relationship to the post made in
the first place
>
>> Go to his house and beat his ass, or shut the **** up, please.
>
> You're cordially invited to follow your own advice, Zero.

you are saying he is Mitshibitshii A6M
>Especially the part about "shut(ing) the #### up.

what are you saying
>
> No 73 for you. You're a putz.

more sex steve
>
>Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[K4YZ]

wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> >Steveo wrote:
> >
> >> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
> >> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
> >> to rrcb when you ass of yourself?
> >
> > The fool here is Frankie.
>
> how so

Uhhhh...let's start with lying.

Then we'll add in his dishonorable conduct in the Armed Forces.

A pinch of trolling added in with a pinch of deceit, and wa-LAA!
your answer.

> if he is you have never shown it such

No...HE has shown it, Markie.

> nor does your reponse have any real relationship to the post made in
> the first place

It was his comments I was responding to, Markie...Tell it to him!

> >> Go to his house and beat his ass, or shut the **** up, please.
> >
> > You're cordially invited to follow your own advice, Zero.
>
> you are saying he is Mitshibitshii A6M

What's a Mitshibshii A6M...?!?!

> >Especially the part about "shut(ing) the #### up.
>
> what are you saying

I am suggesting "Steveo" follow his own advice.

> > No 73 for you. You're a putz.
>
> more sex steve

Not with you.

Steve, K4YZ

[acryfordecency2@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 28 Jan 2006 21:58:57 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

learn to spell
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[K4YZ]

Steveo wrote:
> "K4YZ" > wrote/SLAP
> >
> You suck, Roberson.

Yo mama.

Steve, K4YZ

[acryfordecency2@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 29 Jan 2006 06:40:22 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

>
>Steveo wrote:
>> "K4YZ" > wrote/SLAP
>> >
>> You suck, Roberson.
>
> Yo mama.

more of your personal attack
>
>Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[K4YZ]

wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2006 06:40:22 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> >Steveo wrote:
>>>
> >> You suck, Roberson.
> >
> > Yo mama.
>
> more of your personal attack

Oh...?!?!

and "You suck" wasn't...?!?!

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !

Steve, K4YZ

[an old friend]

K4YZ wrote:
> wrote:
> > On 29 Jan 2006 06:40:22 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> > >Steveo wrote:
> >>>
> > >> You suck, Roberson.
> > >
> > > Yo mama.
> >
> > more of your personal attack
>
> Oh...?!?!

yes
>
> and "You suck" wasn't...?!?!

never made any coent on that

but I even defended you elsewhere I said you did not suck

[DrDeath]

> wrote in message
...
> On 28 Jan 2006 21:58:57 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
>
> learn to spell
Learn to cut rec.radio.cb from this stupid fight.

[an_old_friend]

DrDeath wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
> > On 28 Jan 2006 21:58:57 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> >
> > learn to spell
> Learn to cut rec.radio.cb from this stupid fight.

why should I

be gratefull that I cut out his hunderd or so line of **** filled stuff
to reply to take only in RRAP

and doing this will tend to kill the threads he has retasked over to CB

have a proble well tel me a better to deal with a spelling cop and I'll
consider it

[DrDeath]

"an_old_friend" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> DrDeath wrote:
>> > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On 28 Jan 2006 21:58:57 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
>> >
>> > learn to spell
>> Learn to cut rec.radio.cb from this stupid fight.
>
> why should I
>
> be gratefull that I cut out his hunderd or so line of **** filled stuff
> to reply to take only in RRAP

Thanx
>
> and doing this will tend to kill the threads he has retasked over to CB

Great
>
> have a proble well tel me a better to deal with a spelling cop and I'll
> consider it
>
If he serves no better purpose in life than to correct spelling, take pity
on his miserable existence, then killfile the prick.

[an old freind]

DrDeath wrote:
> "an_old_friend" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > DrDeath wrote:
> >> > wrote in message
> >> ...
> >> > On 28 Jan 2006 21:58:57 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> >> >
> >> > learn to spell
> >> Learn to cut rec.radio.cb from this stupid fight.
> >
> > why should I
> >
> > be gratefull that I cut out his hunderd or so line of **** filled stuff
> > to reply to take only in RRAP
>
> Thanx
yw
> >
> > and doing this will tend to kill the threads he has retasked over to CB
>
> Great
gald to do it
> >
> > have a proble well tel me a better to deal with a spelling cop and I'll
> > consider it
> >
> If he serves no better purpose in life than to correct spelling, take pity
> on his miserable existence, then killfile the prick.

if that was the worst of his sins I'd do just that

[LenAnderson@ieee.org]

From: on Sat, Jan 28 2006 11:08 am


wrote:
>> From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am
>> >On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
>> >>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> >>> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> >>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> >>> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> >>> >> >an old friend wrote:
>> >>> >> >> K4YZ wrote:

>> >>> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>> >
>> >>> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
>> >
>> >>> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
>> >
>> >> Imaginary?
>> >
>> >> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
>> >>aparition.
>> >
>> >"apparition"
>>
>> Ghoul friend? :-)
>
>He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his
>new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is
>stupid.

Not "stupid." Sociopathic with a vivid imagination, yes.

Sociopathic in that Dudly can't understand others, is not
(seemingly) fazed by criticsm of his obvious flaws.


>> >>> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
>> >>> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
>> >>> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
>> >
>> >>> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
>> >>> you never served at all.
>> >
>> >> But WAIT a minute...
>> >
>> >> YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
>> >>service...?!?!
>> >
>> >> Seems you're very confused.
>> >
>> >Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
>> >trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
>> >in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
>> >writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
>> >so was your response.
>>
>> If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
>> the outrage to handle it all... :-)
>
>May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone
>I've ever seen.

Hummmm...that's only from their "tech reps" on telephones. :-)

Not India. Might start an international incident. It's bad
enough we have Pakistan ticked off at the USA (due to
Predator UAVs).


>> >> Most liars of your character are, though.
>> >
>> >> And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
>> >>statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
>> >>military matters as you, NOT factual.
>> >
>> >Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.
>>
>> The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...
>
>Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on
>the outside of the glove.

BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!

No wonder he gets so angry at times! :-)


>> >>> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
>> >>> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
>> >>> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
>> >>> fail to amuse.
>> >
>> >> Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
>> >
>> >Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
>> >existence.
>>
>> They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)
>>
>> Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
>> up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."
>
>I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance
>corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50
>years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there
>began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years
>of imprisonment and $10,000 fine.

Just another case of "Dudley-ism" (that late novelist Ernest K.
Gann wrote about). Impersonation. Wanna-be heroics, "standing
tall" in uniforms, getting "respect" for showing a manly, fierce
heroic visage. Still a FAKE, though.

Here in Hollywood those are known as "actors" and get paid for
what they do. :-)


>And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When
>and where for starters.

His battery is dead so he can't get the "starter" going.

He was NEVER IN any "seven hostile actions" (other than bar
fights).

Those "seven hostile actions" would be recorded on his DD-214.
Problem is, he doesn't have any that can be recorded and he
hasn't yet copied his DD-214, copied his "honorable discharge",
or copied any sort of documentation proving his case.


>> Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
>> of "service" is nowhere to be seen.
>>
>Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who
>always was someplace else when the going got tuff.

"Soldier?" Nope. When he goes, he will be encased in the
Tomb of the Unknown SOLDER.

And a cold-solder joint that is...no continuity.


>> >>> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
>> >>> >stupidity by now...
>>
>> "Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
>> ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
>> wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.
>
>Nowhere to be seen.

...the "going got tuff" so Dudly didn't bother to copy his DD-214.


>> >Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>>
>> He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)
>
>Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.

He's got a vivid imagination. There is NO "attorney." Ergo,
there's no "spouse" of that "attorney."

>Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?

He isn't "getting any" either, hence the misogny.


>> Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
>> He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
>> credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
>> all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?
>
>Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you,
>and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting.

Irrelevant. Jimmie has gone over to the "dark side" anyway,
so all he can do is repost those bimonthly "active-duty ham"
numbers. Davie condones Dudly. Davie and Dudly are very much
alike: Can't tell either of them anything. :-)


>All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
>needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
>his despicable claims. Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
>stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
>sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
>terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
>what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).

Dudly will NOT refrain. He lives vicariously in his personna
on the net, imagination in overdrive. It's probably better
than his personal life.


>How you been, Len?

Very well, thank you. I just look in here about twice a week
and see the usual Dudly Damnations of All Who Disagree With Him
and then erase the Google message bundles. Those aren't worth
the magnetic flux in microscopic areas of my hard drive. :-)

I have improved my skim-reading abilities, fast-forwarding
through all those "argument" postings, the nonsense "FAQs"
from across the Pond, and the Anony-mousies cussing up a
storm. :-) Have you noticed that Dudly is picking up on
an altered form of "anony-mousie"? :-)

Back to Real Life...

[Frank Gilliland]

On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
om>:

>
>Steveo wrote:
>
>> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
>> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
>> to rrcb when you #### yourself?
>
> The fool here is Frankie.


The fool here is you, Dud. You have no idea what you're getting
yourself into by ****ing off Mope. Provoke the beast at your own risk.








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[acryfordecency2@Mark.Morgan.com]

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:53:26 -0800, Frank Gilliland
> wrote:

>On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
om>:
>
>>
>>Steveo wrote:
>>
>>> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
>>> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
>>> to rrcb when you #### yourself?
>>
>> The fool here is Frankie.
>
>
>The fool here is you, Dud. You have no idea what you're getting
>yourself into by ****ing off Mope. Provoke the beast at your own risk.
>
steve never has any idea wha the is doing
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> From: on Sat, Jan 28 2006 11:08 am
>
>
> wrote:
> >> From: Frank Gilliland on Jan 25, 9:09 am
> >> >On 25 Jan 2006 08:22:12 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote in
> >> >>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >> >>> On 24 Jan 2006 22:34:55 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> >> >>> >Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> >> >>> >> On 24 Jan 2006 15:04:38 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> >> >>> >> >an old friend wrote:
> >> >>> >> >> K4YZ wrote:
>
> >> >>> >> Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> >> >
> >> >>> > Change of subject, eh, Frankie..?!?!
> >> >
> >> >>> Your imaginary lawyer has been the subject for quite some time.
> >> >
> >> >> Imaginary?
> >> >
> >> >> His new wife will be interested to know she's been sleeping with an
> >> >>aparition.
> >> >
> >> >"apparition"
> >>
> >> Ghoul friend? :-)
> >
> >He'll be ****ed when he sees that his newest client is discussing his
> >new wife and her sleeping habits on the web. Hi! Steve really is
> >stupid.
>
> Not "stupid." Sociopathic with a vivid imagination, yes.

Agreed.

> Sociopathic in that Dudly can't understand others, is not
> (seemingly) fazed by criticsm of his obvious flaws.

Lives in a make believe world.

> >> >>> > Ya came out swinging with that "big revelation" of yours about how
> >> >>> >I allegedly claimed to have served with 1/24, yet haven't addressed the
> >> >>> >FACT that you were AGAIN wrong.
> >> >
> >> >>> Doesn't matter if I was right or wrong -- you've already proven that
> >> >>> you never served at all.
> >> >
> >> >> But WAIT a minute...
> >> >
> >> >> YOU just put out a "big expose" allegedly proving I WAS in the
> >> >>service...?!?!
> >> >
> >> >> Seems you're very confused.
> >> >
> >> >Hardly. My "big expose", as you describe it, was an exercise in
> >> >trolling. It worked. But then, all I have to do is mention your name
> >> >in a post and you get all upset. So I guess I put more effort into
> >> >writing it than was necessary..... but what the hell, it was fun, and
> >> >so was your response.
> >>
> >> If Dud's response was any more outraged, he would have to outsource
> >> the outrage to handle it all... :-)
> >
> >May I suggest India? Their post-docs do "outraged" better than anyone
> >I've ever seen.
>
> Hummmm...that's only from their "tech reps" on telephones. :-)

Hi!

> Not India. Might start an international incident. It's bad
> enough we have Pakistan ticked off at the USA (due to
> Predator UAVs).

As I was taking off my shoes again and again and again at the airport
last week, I was glad that the guy who trained Richard Reed in shoe
explosives died in that wake-up call.

If only Richard Reed had met the same fate...

> >> >> Most liars of your character are, though.
> >> >
> >> >> And of COURSE it matters if you were "right or wrong"...You made
> >> >>statements as facts that were, to a person as allegedly informed of
> >> >>military matters as you, NOT factual.
> >> >
> >> >Just like your "statements as facts" about the JULIETT crypto system.
> >>
> >> The only "KY" that Dud knows is a jelly...
> >
> >Steve always forgets; the powder goes inside the glove, the KY goes on
> >the outside of the glove.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> No wonder he gets so angry at times! :-)

Especially when he can't name any crypto gear he used in the marines.

> >> >>> It's just too much fun to watch you fabricate
> >> >>> justifications and excuses for your contradictions, and I have a few
> >> >>> days off from work, so I thought I'd rattle your cage a bit. You never
> >> >>> fail to amuse.
> >> >
> >> >> Seems YOU are the one with the fabrications, Frankie...
> >> >
> >> >Yet you continue to respond to them as if they threatened your very
> >> >existence.
> >>
> >> They DO threaten his imaginary existance! :-)
> >>
> >> Dudly has been living his USMC LIE so long that he MUST keep
> >> up the pretense in order to (in his world) "save face."
> >
> >I saw an article in the USA Today last week about a former USMC lance
> >corporal who has been telling folks he was a Colonel for about 50
> >years. So he was asked to speak at an engagement, and someone there
> >began to question this guy's credentials. Now he's faced with 5 years
> >of imprisonment and $10,000 fine.
>
> Just another case of "Dudley-ism" (that late novelist Ernest K.
> Gann wrote about). Impersonation. Wanna-be heroics, "standing
> tall" in uniforms, getting "respect" for showing a manly, fierce
> heroic visage. Still a FAKE, though.

I wonder when he's going to update his official visage now that he's a
CAP Major?

> Here in Hollywood those are known as "actors" and get paid for
> what they do. :-)

Steve is off-Wroadway. Way, way off.

> >And I'm still curious about Robeson's seven (7) hostile actions. When
> >and where for starters.
>
> His battery is dead so he can't get the "starter" going.
>
> He was NEVER IN any "seven hostile actions" (other than bar
> fights).

Probably shoots his mouth off there, too.

> Those "seven hostile actions" would be recorded on his DD-214.
> Problem is, he doesn't have any that can be recorded and he
> hasn't yet copied his DD-214, copied his "honorable discharge",
> or copied any sort of documentation proving his case.

Mine says expeditionary and two SWA, a bunch of other stuff.

And subject to recall by Sec. A.F.

If someone gets booted for mental issues, can they be recalled?

> >> Anything in the way of other documentation of those 18 years
> >> of "service" is nowhere to be seen.
> >>
> >Steve was probably one of those "Nowhere to be seen" soldiers who
> >always was someplace else when the going got tuff.
>
> "Soldier?" Nope. When he goes, he will be encased in the
> Tomb of the Unknown SOLDER.
>
> And a cold-solder joint that is...no continuity.

50/50? 60/40? 63/37? Rosin? Acid?

Nobody knows.

> >> >>> > I'd think you'd get tired of getting slapped around with your own
> >> >>> >stupidity by now...
> >>
> >> "Stupidity?" Not really. A check of USMC units shows which
> >> ones are the Reserves and which are the Active-duty. Dudly
> >> wasn't in any named Active-duty unit.
> >
> >Nowhere to be seen.
>
> ...the "going got tuff" so Dudly didn't bother to copy his DD-214.

OopsayOh! (Gone!)

> >> >Who's your lawyer, Dud?
> >>
> >> He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)
> >
> >Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.
>
> He's got a vivid imagination. There is NO "attorney." Ergo,
> there's no "spouse" of that "attorney."

I fell into his trap that I believed him. Thanks for setting me
straight.

> >Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?
>
> He isn't "getting any" either, hence the misogny.

I noticed that Mrs Steve hasn't jumped in here as she has in the past.
Maybe she doesn't support his latest screw-up.

> >> Dudly keeps on insulting those who challenge his truthfulness.
> >> He offers NO proof, only those personal insults. He lost
> >> credibility in here years ago...but the "CW" Extras in here
> >> all condone his activity. Who woulda thought it?
> >
> >Welp, I recall Jim Miccolis asking him why he keept replying to you,
> >and more recently Jim Hampton asked him to refrain from posting.
>
> Irrelevant. Jimmie has gone over to the "dark side" anyway,
> so all he can do is repost those bimonthly "active-duty ham"
> numbers. Davie condones Dudly. Davie and Dudly are very much
> alike: Can't tell either of them anything. :-)

Welp, I don't condone Steve's bad behavio[u]r.

> >All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
> >needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
> >his despicable claims. Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
> >stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
> >sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
> >terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
> >what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).
>
> Dudly will NOT refrain. He lives vicariously in his personna
> on the net, imagination in overdrive. It's probably better
> than his personal life.

Poor thing.

> >How you been, Len?
>
> Very well, thank you. I just look in here about twice a week
> and see the usual Dudly Damnations of All Who Disagree With Him
> and then erase the Google message bundles. Those aren't worth
> the magnetic flux in microscopic areas of my hard drive. :-)

Flux Steve.

> I have improved my skim-reading abilities, fast-forwarding
> through all those "argument" postings, the nonsense "FAQs"
> from across the Pond, and the Anony-mousies cussing up a
> storm. :-) Have you noticed that Dudly is picking up on
> an altered form of "anony-mousie"? :-)

He's definitely one of the anons.

> Back to Real Life...
>
>

Had a bad case of the flu a couple of weeks ago. Kept me out of work
three days and eating crackers for a week. Went to Georgia most of
last week for meeting, glad to be in my own bed again.

bb

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:53:26 -0800, Frank Gilliland
> > wrote:
>
> >On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> om>:
> >
> >>
> >>Steveo wrote:
> >>
> >>> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
> >>> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
> >>> to rrcb when you #### yourself?
> >>
> >> The fool here is Frankie.
> >
> >
> >The fool here is you, Dud. You have no idea what you're getting
> >yourself into by ****ing off Mope. Provoke the beast at your own risk.
> >
> steve never has any idea wha the is doing

I dunno. He might.

His problem is that he cannot not reply.

[kb9rqz@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 29 Jan 2006 12:39:01 -0800, wrote:

>
wrote:
>> From: on Sat, Jan 28 2006 11:08 am
>>
cut

>> Those "seven hostile actions" would be recorded on his DD-214.
>> Problem is, he doesn't have any that can be recorded and he
>> hasn't yet copied his DD-214, copied his "honorable discharge",
>> or copied any sort of documentation proving his case.
>
>Mine says expeditionary and two SWA, a bunch of other stuff.
>
>And subject to recall by Sec. A.F.
>
>If someone gets booted for mental issues, can they be recalled?

yes in theory but it rarely happens outside of special forces or so
the rumor goes and the recalls of of suicidal types need for the rae
US suacide bombing
the un porven rumor is supposed to the basis forthe ONeil character in
Stargate

>> >> >Who's your lawyer, Dud?
>> >>
>> >> He doesn't have one. None would take his "case." :-)
>> >
>> >Yet Steve seems to know who a newlywed attorneys wife is sleeping with.
>>
>> He's got a vivid imagination. There is NO "attorney." Ergo,
>> there's no "spouse" of that "attorney."
>
>I fell into his trap that I believed him. Thanks for setting me
>straight.

it is his SOp throw so much **** out that one starts to over look all
the BS very beobellish
>
>> >Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?
>>
>> He isn't "getting any" either, hence the misogny.
>
>I noticed that Mrs Steve hasn't jumped in here as she has in the past.
>Maybe she doesn't support his latest screw-up.
>
she has?
>> Irrelevant. Jimmie has gone over to the "dark side" anyway,
>> so all he can do is repost those bimonthly "active-duty ham"
>> numbers. Davie condones Dudly. Davie and Dudly are very much
>> alike: Can't tell either of them anything. :-)
>
>Welp, I don't condone Steve's bad behavio[u]r.
>
>> >All that's just covering up that Steve is not a good net citizen, and
>> >needs to apologize to all the folks he's offended over the years with
>> >his despicable claims. Then he needs to refrain from grossly off topic
>> >stuff such as who Mark sleeps with or who his new attorney's wife is
>> >sleeping with, dialing..., rocks through , slashed tires, and
>> >terrorized wives, homosexuality, pedophilia, and outrageous claims of
>> >what a macho marine he was (if he ever was a marine).
>>
>> Dudly will NOT refrain. He lives vicariously in his personna
>> on the net, imagination in overdrive. It's probably better
>> than his personal life.
>
>Poor thing.
>
>> >How you been, Len?
>>
>> Very well, thank you. I just look in here about twice a week
>> and see the usual Dudly Damnations of All Who Disagree With Him
>> and then erase the Google message bundles. Those aren't worth
>> the magnetic flux in microscopic areas of my hard drive. :-)
>
>Flux Steve.
>
>> I have improved my skim-reading abilities, fast-forwarding
>> through all those "argument" postings, the nonsense "FAQs"
>> from across the Pond, and the Anony-mousies cussing up a
>> storm. :-) Have you noticed that Dudly is picking up on
>> an altered form of "anony-mousie"? :-)
>
>He's definitely one of the anons.
>
>> Back to Real Life...
>>
>>
>
>Had a bad case of the flu a couple of weeks ago. Kept me out of work
>three days and eating crackers for a week. Went to Georgia most of
>last week for meeting, glad to be in my own bed again.

sorry tohear that sorrier to learn that you had t pass nearer to steve
than normal
>
>bb

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

wrote:
> On 29 Jan 2006 12:39:01 -0800, wrote:
>
> >
> wrote:
> >> From: on Sat, Jan 28 2006 11:08 am
> >>
> cut
>
> >> Those "seven hostile actions" would be recorded on his DD-214.
> >> Problem is, he doesn't have any that can be recorded and he
> >> hasn't yet copied his DD-214, copied his "honorable discharge",
> >> or copied any sort of documentation proving his case.
> >
> >Mine says expeditionary and two SWA, a bunch of other stuff.
> >
> >And subject to recall by Sec. A.F.
> >
> >If someone gets booted for mental issues, can they be recalled?
>
> yes in theory but it rarely happens outside of special forces or so
> the rumor goes and the recalls of of suicidal types need for the rae
> US suacide bombing
> the un porven rumor is supposed to the basis forthe ONeil character in
> Stargate

Welp, Iraq needs a few good men.

> >> >Wonder why Steve always has to bring the women folk into his messes?
> >>
> >> He isn't "getting any" either, hence the misogny.
> >
> >I noticed that Mrs Steve hasn't jumped in here as she has in the past.
> >Maybe she doesn't support his latest screw-up.
> >
> she has?

Yepper! If you QRZ Steve's call, then QRZ that address another
callsign will show. Then if you Google her call on this group...

And I see on QRZ that K4CAP has been forked over to someone near
Maxwell AFB, HQ of the Air Force's Civil Air Patrol (CAP). What a
coincidence.

> >Had a bad case of the flu a couple of weeks ago. Kept me out of work
> >three days and eating crackers for a week. Went to Georgia most of
> >last week for meeting, glad to be in my own bed again.
>
> sorry tohear that sorrier to learn that you had t pass nearer to steve
> than normal

Yep, I was hovering near the porcelain throne - didn't know whether to
sit or kneel.

[hot-ham-and-cheese@hotmail.com]

K4YZ wrote:
> wrote:
> > On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:
> > >Steveo wrote:
> > >
> > >> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to see
> > >> what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross posting
> > >> to rrcb when you ass of yourself?
> > >
> > > The fool here is Frankie.
> >
> > how so
>
> Uhhhh...let's start with lying.

If we're going to start with lying, we're going to have to start with
you.

> Then we'll add in his dishonorable conduct in the Armed Forces.

Something got you kicked out of the USMC, too. Care to reveal what it
was?

[Steveo]

Frank Gilliland > wrote:
> On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
> om>:
>
> >
> >Steveo wrote:
> >
> >> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to
> >> see what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross
> >> posting to rrcb when you #### yourself?
> >
> > The fool here is Frankie.
>
> The fool here is you, Dud. You have no idea what you're getting
> yourself into by ****ing off Mope. Provoke the beast at your own risk.
>
Beast? lol Hopefully we can refer to the Seahawks that way this weekend! It
looks a bit like the Stillers are on a mission.

As to the other thing...Steven J Robeson never knows when to shut the ****
up.

--
30GB/month http://newsreader.com/

[K4YZ]

Steveo wrote:

> As to the other thing...Steven J Robeson never knows when to shut the ####
> up.

Yo mama.

Steve, K4YZ

[Frank Gilliland]

On 30 Jan 2006 11:38:52 GMT, Steveo > wrote in
>:

>Frank Gilliland > wrote:
>> On 28 Jan 2006 20:06:39 -0800, "Major Dud" > wrote in
>> om>:
>>
>> >
>> >Steveo wrote:
>> >
>> >> Can you turn the light away from your chest pounding long enough to
>> >> see what a fool these people are making of you, or at least stop cross
>> >> posting to rrcb when you #### yourself?
>> >
>> > The fool here is Frankie.
>>
>> The fool here is you, Dud. You have no idea what you're getting
>> yourself into by ****ing off Mope. Provoke the beast at your own risk.
>>
>Beast? lol Hopefully we can refer to the Seahawks that way this weekend! It
>looks a bit like the Stillers are on a mission.


It will be an interesting game for sure. The Hawks are one of the best
NFL teams I've seen in years -- I'm really suprised that the Steelers
are favored by 4 points. The only way Seattle can lose is if they rack
up too many penalties or if Hasslebeck goes down, IMO.


>As to the other thing...Steven J Robeson never knows when to shut the ****
>up.


No, he doesn't. Considering he lives in TN, I'm expecting to see a pic
within the next few months of him standing guard over his antenna farm
with a BB gun.







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

[K4YZ]

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2006 11:38:52 GMT, Steveo > wrote in

> >As to the other thing...Steven J Robeson never knows when to shut the ####
> >up.
>
> No, he doesn't.

Seems you "suffer" the same illness, Frankie.

> Considering he lives in TN, I'm expecting to see a pic
> within the next few months of him standing guard over his antenna farm
> with a BB gun.

Nope. I have a bit more firepower at my disposal than that.

Steve, K4YZ

[an_old_friend]

K4YZ wrote:
> Frankie of Silliland wrote:

> Nope. I have a bit more firepower at my disposal than that.

always with the threats
>
> Steve, K4YZ

[K4YZ]

Steveo the Zero wrote:

> Hehe, wearing that uniform he got at the Goodwill?

Steveo-the-Zero dug deep for that one!

Steve, K4YZ

[K4YZ]

Frankie of Silliland wrote:
> On 31 Jan 2006 11:12:22 GMT, Steveo > wrote in
> >:

> >Hehe, wearing that uniform he got at the Goodwill?
>
> Naw, he could barely fit into those PJs when the pic was taken. By now
> he's probably limited to sweatpants and suspenders.

Projection, I see.

Probably a bit upset that that DD214 would probably keep you out
of ANY uniform...Even CAP or the CGAux.

> BTW, I forgot to thank you for the wake-up call -- I've leaned out at
> 210 and holding for about a year now. I didn't realize how much that
> extra flab took out of me until it was gone.

Geeze...Didn't learn anything in the Corps, did you?

And Frankie...That flab just moved up to your ears.

Steve, K4YZ

[kb9rqz@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 31 Jan 2006 06:09:33 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

>
>Steveo the Zero wrote:
>
>> Hehe, wearing that uniform he got at the Goodwill?
>
> Steveo-the-Zero dug deep for that one!

not realy it is an easy cheap shot from the worn and frayed unifrom
you display on yourhome page
>
>Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[kb9rqz@Mark.Morgan.com]

On 31 Jan 2006 07:41:11 -0800, "K4YZ" > wrote:

>
>Frankie of Silliland wrote:
>> On 31 Jan 2006 11:12:22 GMT, Steveo > wrote in
>> >:
>
>> >Hehe, wearing that uniform he got at the Goodwill?
>>
>> Naw, he could barely fit into those PJs when the pic was taken. By now
>> he's probably limited to sweatpants and suspenders.
>
> Projection, I see.
>
> Probably a bit upset that that DD214 would probably keep you out
>of ANY uniform...Even CAP or the CGAux.

why?

not everyone get off on unifrom indeed If you are interested I can
point oat unifrom sities Steve
>
>> BTW, I forgot to thank you for the wake-up call -- I've leaned out at
>> 210 and holding for about a year now. I didn't realize how much that
>> extra flab took out of me until it was gone.
>
> Geeze...Didn't learn anything in the Corps, did you?

of course he did
>
> And Frankie...That flab just moved up to your ears.

more attacks
>
>Steve, K4YZ

_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

[moparholic at hotmail dot com is a sissy]

that picture is giving moparholic wood

[moparholic at hotmail dot com is a sissy]

learn not to be gay