<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>RadioBanter - Antenna</title>
		<link>http://www.radiobanter.com</link>
		<description>(rec.radio.amateur.antenna) Covering antennas: theory, techniques and construction.</description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 04:53:48 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Noise to signal ratio</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=148077&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 19:26:16 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Wow, the crazies must be having fun today. Out of 67 new posts, only one 
didn't go to my bozo bin.

That guy from Radiobanter must be tearing his hair out......


	- 73 de Mike N3LI -]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Wow, the crazies must be having fun today. Out of 67 new posts, only one <br />
didn't go to my bozo bin.<br />
<br />
That guy from Radiobanter must be tearing his hair out......<br />
<br />
<br />
	- 73 de Mike N3LI -<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>Michael Coslo</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=148077</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>(OT) Inventing a Better Patent System</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=148024&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 06:01:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Off topic though this certainly is, I'm posting this because I know that 
several people who frequently post in rraa have one or more patents, and 
there have over the years been a number of comments here about the sorry 
state these days of patents and the patenting process in the USA. Moreover,...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Off topic though this certainly is, I'm posting this because I know that <br />
several people who frequently post in rraa have one or more patents, and <br />
there have over the years been a number of comments here about the sorry <br />
state these days of patents and the patenting process in the USA. Moreover, <br />
with some notable exceptions, postings in this newsgroup often show <br />
intelligence and thoughtfulness on the part of the people making the <br />
postings, more often than in many of the other newsgroups I read.<br />
<br />
With that said, I'd enjoy reading comments on the NY Times article <br />
&quot;Inventing a Better Patent System&quot;, which you can see at<br />
&lt;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/17/opinion/17pozen.html?hp&gt;.<br />
The author makes five specific recommendations for amendments to patent law <br />
which he believes would improve the situation. I'm a (retired) pure <br />
mathematician with no patents whatsoever, and my knowledge of law is nil. <br />
But what he says seems to make sense to me.<br />
<br />
If you can illustrate why you agree, or disagree, with points made in the <br />
article by referring to antenna patents (or other patents on related <br />
matters) with which you are familiar, that would be good, and it would make <br />
the issue a little less off-topic. Thanks in advance for reading the article <br />
and making your comments.<br />
<br />
David, ex-W8EZE<br />
<br />
-- <br />
David Ryeburn<br />
<a </a><br />
To send e-mail, use &quot;ca&quot; instead of &quot;caz&quot;.<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>David Ryeburn</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=148024</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mercatino radiantistico italian</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147998&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[http://www.radioamateur.it/public/mercato/index.php Mercatino
dell'usato per radioamatori interamente realizzato da iz4hyz ( Ezio
Tulli ) vuole essere un servizio per permettere l'incontro di tutti
quegli appassionati di radio (RADIOAMATORI E NON) che vogliono
scambiare materiale radiantistico. Qui...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><a href="http://www.radioamateur.it/public/mercato/index.php" target="_blank">http://www.radioamateur.it/public/mercato/index.php</a> Mercatino<br />
dell'usato per radioamatori interamente realizzato da iz4hyz ( Ezio<br />
Tulli ) vuole essere un servizio per permettere l'incontro di tutti<br />
quegli appassionati di radio (RADIOAMATORI E NON) che vogliono<br />
scambiare materiale radiantistico. Qui puoi vendere, comprare o<br />
scambiare: ricetrasmettitori, antenne direttive, verticali, dipoli<br />
filari, amplificatori lineari, accordatori d'antenne, alimentatori,<br />
componenti elettronici, computer, apparati su 27 Mhz, cavo rg 58, rg8,<br />
rg213, metaldetector, valvole, radio a valvole, circuiti stampati,<br />
saldatori, notebook o altro materiale elettronico che non utilizzi pił.<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>ezio</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147998</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Causes of Distrust of NEC  and Mininec programs</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147989&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 06:23:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Cebic found when comparing different style programs that some behaved
well in certain circumstance where others did not. Yet all antenna
programs
are based on the use of Maxwells equations where all programs should
have the same results, after all Maxwells equations are exact and not
fudged. One of...</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Cebic found when comparing different style programs that some behaved<br />
well in certain circumstance where others did not. Yet all antenna<br />
programs<br />
are based on the use of Maxwells equations where all programs should<br />
have the same results, after all Maxwells equations are exact and not<br />
fudged. One of the reasons is that since Maxwells laws are exact<br />
radiators used must be resonant at repeatable points designated as a<br />
period.<br />
   Fact is that most users use fractional wavelength designs, usually<br />
a half wavelength, that is not resonant at repeatable points where<br />
the area around the datum line of a sine wave is never equal when<br />
generated around a tank circuit.<br />
    The reason for this is &quot;voltage over shoot&quot; which gets smaller<br />
with every cycle but never disappears. Thus when programs are used<br />
based on fractional wavelength radiators the results will never show<br />
100% accountability and in fact efficiencies derived will be in the<br />
order of 92%!<br />
  If the radiator is of a wavelength then one is not using a &quot;fudge&quot;<br />
figure<br />
in the calculations and  then becomes possible to attain total<br />
accountability with efficiency of 100%. regardles of what type program<br />
is used.<br />
   If one is to use exact equations, as are Maxwell equations, then<br />
one must also use measurements that are also exact and repeatable and<br />
that is definitely not fractional wavelengths!<br />
 What one gains from this aproach is that any radiator of any shape,<br />
 size or elevation can provide figures in the order of 100% as long as<br />
the radiator is a multiple of a wavelength where it is  resonant at<br />
exact and repeatable measurements.<br />
If anybody can give pointers that refute the accuracy of the above I<br />
would be very interested in hearing them<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>Art Unwin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147989</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>re:folded dipole calculator help</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147972&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 20:56:40 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Your statement:
 The fellow I'm disagreeing with say's,
"the reason that the variable in the calculator for the "dipole feed 
impedance"
could be if you want to transform the z to something else, such as 50 ohms."
 I don't even understand what he means.

My thoughts:  My radio output impedance is...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Your statement:<br />
 The fellow I'm disagreeing with say's,<br />
&quot;the reason that the variable in the calculator for the &quot;dipole feed <br />
impedance&quot;<br />
could be if you want to transform the z to something else, such as 50 ohms.&quot;<br />
 I don't even understand what he means.<br />
<br />
My thoughts:  My radio output impedance is 50 ohms, for a feed line I use <br />
RG-8 and other 50 ohm impedenance coax.<br />
If I were to use a folded dipole antenna I think I would prefer one that had <br />
a 50 ohm feedpoint.<br />
<br />
Nuff said, KD0FGX <br />
<br />
<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>Cyclone651</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147972</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Folded Dipole Calculator Help</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147971&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 18:05:21 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi All,
 I'm having a disagreement about the use of this folded dipole calculator 
impedance calculator.
http://www.k7mem.150m.com/Electronic_Notebook/antennas/folded_dipole.html
 We are using it to calculate the impedance of folded dipoles to drive a 
yagi.
When entering data it asks for "Simple...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> Hi All,<br />
 I'm having a disagreement about the use of this folded dipole calculator <br />
impedance calculator.<br />
<a href="http://www.k7mem.150m.com/Electronic_Notebook/antennas/folded_dipole.html" target="_blank">http://www.k7mem.150m.com/Electronic...ed_dipole.html</a><br />
 We are using it to calculate the impedance of folded dipoles to drive a <br />
yagi.<br />
When entering data it asks for &quot;Simple dipole feed impedance (ohms)&quot;<br />
Default is 72 ohms. This assumes a 1/2 wave dipole.<br />
 The fellow I'm disagreeing with say's,<br />
&quot;the reason that the variable in the calculator for the &quot;dipole feed <br />
impedance&quot;<br />
could be if you want to transform the z to something else, such as 50 ohms.&quot;<br />
 I don't even understand what he means.<br />
I can only think of one reason to alter the 72 ohms, that would be if you<br />
use a a different length folded dipole.<br />
 I'll readily admit the other fellow knows more about this than me, but<br />
I need more convincing :-)<br />
 Can anyone explain this to me.<br />
                      Thanks, Mike<br />
 <br />
<br />
<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>amdx</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147971</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Matching on the MFJ-1800</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147945&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 13:28:34 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi All,
 My original thread seems to have died, still wondering how the folded loop
is matched to 50 ohms. (probably isn't? cheap, but works?)
 I've added a dimensional drawing and some more pics.
If more info is needed let me know.


Here is a drawing and some more...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div> Hi All,<br />
 My original thread seems to have died, still wondering how the folded loop<br />
is matched to 50 ohms. (probably isn't? cheap, but works?)<br />
 I've added a dimensional drawing and some more pics.<br />
If more info is needed let me know.<br />
<br />
<br />
Here is a drawing and some more pics.<br />
<a href="http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/pp37/Qmavam/MFJPaintFileJPG.jpg" target="_blank">http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...intFileJPG.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/pp37/Qmavam/MFJCoaxconnection.jpg" target="_blank">http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...connection.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/pp37/Qmavam/MFJRuledDE.jpg" target="_blank">http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...MFJRuledDE.jpg</a><br />
<a href="http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/pp37/Qmavam/MFJruledcoax.jpg" target="_blank">http://i395.photobucket.com/albums/p...Jruledcoax.jpg</a><br />
  Hope I covered everything,<br />
                                 Mike<br />
<br />
<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>amdx</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147945</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Genius</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147912&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 16:41:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[from http://unwinantennas.com/:

"The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it
produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these
particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke
even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>from <a href="http://unwinantennas.com/:" target="_blank">http://unwinantennas.com/:</a><br />
<br />
&quot;The Sun is very hot because it is burning. Burning as we know it<br />
produces soot and other by products in abundance that when these<br />
particles collect in the air they become visual to the eye as smoke<br />
even tho the particles themselves are invisible to the eye unless<br />
there is a contrast in light as with particles passing thru a shaft of<br />
light thru a window.&quot;<br />
<br />
Does the author not understand the difference between fusion and<br />
combustion? Why would anyone pay attention to such an ignoramus when<br />
he writes about antenna theory?<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill[_4_]]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147912</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>mast position when mounting a beam?</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147911&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:06:31 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[I'm in the process of putting up a 4 element 6 meter beam.
I'd like it to be balanced but that means I'll be attaching
it to my pole half way between the driven element and
first director. This is a 2" diameter aluminum pole and I'm
concerned that it will interfere with the pattern.

Can anyone say...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I'm in the process of putting up a 4 element 6 meter beam.<br />
I'd like it to be balanced but that means I'll be attaching<br />
it to my pole half way between the driven element and<br />
first director. This is a 2&quot; diameter aluminum pole and I'm<br />
concerned that it will interfere with the pattern.<br />
<br />
Can anyone say (with some level of confidence) if this is<br />
a problem? Normally, beams seem to be mounted adjacent<br />
to an element. TIA<br />
<br />
                     Steve <br />
<br />
<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147911</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Remote progr. antenna rotator AR500 - Manual</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147871&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:09:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Hi all,
I'm looking for the instructions manual of the "Remote Programmable Antenna 
Rotator AR500". I bought one at a local 2nd-hand-ham-market but I can't use 
it without the manual.
Has anybody a scan of it ? Or does anybody know a link to download it?
I would be very gratefull if I found any...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Hi all,<br />
I'm looking for the instructions manual of the &quot;Remote Programmable Antenna <br />
Rotator AR500&quot;. I bought one at a local 2nd-hand-ham-market but I can't use <br />
it without the manual.<br />
Has anybody a scan of it ? Or does anybody know a link to download it?<br />
I would be very gratefull if I found any help !<br />
Thanks a lot in advance<br />
<br />
Dk<br />
Normandy/France<br />
dominique dot kremp at wanadoo dot fr <br />
<br />
<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[D.K.[_2_]]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147871</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Fos sale or swap</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147852&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:51:39 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>I have a 5/8 wave 136 - 230 Mhz, looking for something 2.4 2.5 Ghz.

mbucci@shaw.ca</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>I have a 5/8 wave 136 - 230 Mhz, looking for something 2.4 2.5 Ghz.<br />
<br />
<a </a><br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael[_11_]]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147852</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Multi polarization antenna</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147759&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:50:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>What is the best antenna for use with all circular, horizontal,
vertical and other polarizations without drastic fall of in gain, and
without changes in angular position and feed point via switches e.t.c
at the tower top?</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>What is the best antenna for use with all circular, horizontal,<br />
vertical and other polarizations without drastic fall of in gain, and<br />
without changes in angular position and feed point via switches e.t.c<br />
at the tower top?<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>Art Unwin</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147759</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Angry  WHY is it spammers and assorted other trash are posted in the WRONG forums??</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147757&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 00:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Angry  WHY is it spammers and assorted other trash are posted in the WRONG forums??
If EVERYONE would pay attention to what the hell they're posting,then this site would be more enjoyable for everybody here!!! Politics crap does NOT belong in the shortwave forum!!!! Garbage from you tube does NOT...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Angry  WHY is it spammers and assorted other trash are posted in the WRONG forums??<br />
If EVERYONE would pay attention to what the hell they're posting,then this site would be more enjoyable for everybody here!!! Politics crap does NOT belong in the shortwave forum!!!! Garbage from you tube does NOT belong in the antenna forum!!! Etc,etc!!! Get a clue people,or get lost!!!<br />
Why is it that no one reads what they post... BEFORE they post it??<br />
IS everyone really that stupid? As for SPAMMERS???? ...Death is the only answer for those that have nothing intelligent to add!!!<br />
Wise up already!</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>n9zas</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147757</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>SMS?</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147730&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:28:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Has anyone else noticed that the Prudential commercial
on TV is sending SMS instead of SOS?
-- 
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC,  http://www.w5dxp.com</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Has anyone else noticed that the Prudential commercial<br />
on TV is sending SMS instead of SOS?<br />
-- <br />
73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC,  <a href="http://www.w5dxp.com" target="_blank">http://www.w5dxp.com</a><br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cecil Moore[_2_]]]></dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147730</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Entertainment</title>
			<link>http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147713&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 04:09:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>This site is full of entertainment updates.It has gossips,genuine
news,live exclusive TV channels and all about online games.
Please visit.http://yourstuffs.com/movies/</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>This site is full of entertainment updates.It has gossips,genuine<br />
news,live exclusive TV channels and all about online games.<br />
Please visit.<a href="http://yourstuffs.com/movies/" target="_blank">http://yourstuffs.com/movies/</a><br />
<br />
</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.radiobanter.com/forumdisplay.php?f=4">Antenna</category>
			<dc:creator>kami</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.radiobanter.com/showthread.php?t=147713</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
