loop antennas and noise suppresion

"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...

Your ground is enough only for receiving.
S*

Ah! The humour of it all. I'm now trying to work out if Szczepan floats
above the ground or keeps his feet firmly anchored in it.
Let's remember that, to him, a transmitter is a black box and that he
really doesn't understand that of which he writes. I do like the way he's
moaned about aerials having to be grounded and now has decided that the
ground can be different for Tx and Rx.

In Tx the huge amount of electrons must jump off the antenna. They flow
from the big ground.
In Rx only a few electrons enters in antenna and flow to a little ground.

I have to acknowledge that this group has made me smile more than some of
the comedy shows on BBC Radio 4 Extra.

Me too.
S*
Hello Szczepan.
Your style of physics is so funny. I'll let you work out the obvious mistake
you made.

ttfn, Ian.

On Sun, 1 Jul 2012 15:16:48 +0100, "Ian"
wrote:
"Irv Finkleman" wrote in message
...
Trying to debate or explain anything to Bialek is like explaining
the
development of the Newton Quotient to a cow. It also makes
me wonder about those who are trying!!! :-)

Irv VE6BP


Hi Irv.


It's fun.It leads to some good discussions between the amateurs on
this
group.


It's akin to trying to explain amateur radio to a friend. The
difference is
that friends usually listen and understand whereas S* is a
"copy-and-paste
practitioner" and can't understand.


73, Ian.

The technical discussion on this group has dropped down in the past
year. It is nice to see a renewal of activity, even if some of the
posts are controversial.

However, I personally lose interest when the discussions are
nonsensical.

Szczepan Bialek wrote:


In Tx the huge amount of electrons must jump off the antenna. They flow from
the big ground.
In Rx only a few electrons enters in antenna and flow to a little ground.

Insane, babbling, nonsense.

You really are an idiot.

"Ian" wrote in message
...

snip

"Szczepan Bialek" ... keeps his feet firmly anchored in ...

snip


I cast my vote for


XXX A block of cement


"Sal"

"Ian" wrote in message
...


Hello Szczepan.
Your style of physics is so funny. I'll let you work out the obvious
mistake you made.


His diet is lacking an essential nutrient: brainium.

"Sal"

wrote in message
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


In Tx the huge amount of electrons must jump off the antenna. They flow
from
the big ground.
In Rx only a few electrons enters in antenna and flow to a little ground.

Insane, babbling, nonsense.

You really are an idiot.



Bejamin Franklin is quoted (or misquoted) as saying, "Beer is proof that God
loves us and wants us to be happy." I wonder what Franklin would say about
Bialek.

"Sal"

Sal M. O'Nella wrote:

wrote in message
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


In Tx the huge amount of electrons must jump off the antenna. They flow
from
the big ground.
In Rx only a few electrons enters in antenna and flow to a little ground.

Insane, babbling, nonsense.

You really are an idiot.



Bejamin Franklin is quoted (or misquoted) as saying, "Beer is proof that God
loves us and wants us to be happy." I wonder what Franklin would say about
Bialek.

"Sal"

Who has deceiv'd thee so oft as thy self?

Comes to mind.

Well, considering that Franklin stood out in a storm and attempted
to attract lightning, perhaps they have something in common!

Irv VE6BP

"Sal M. O'Nella" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:


In Tx the huge amount of electrons must jump off the antenna. They flow
from
the big ground.
In Rx only a few electrons enters in antenna and flow to a little
ground.

Insane, babbling, nonsense.

You really are an idiot.



Bejamin Franklin is quoted (or misquoted) as saying, "Beer is proof that
God loves us and wants us to be happy." I wonder what Franklin would say
about Bialek.

"Sal"

wrote in message
...
Sal M. O'Nella wrote:


snip


Bejamin Franklin is quoted (or misquoted) as saying, "Beer is proof that
God
loves us and wants us to be happy." I wonder what Franklin would say
about
Bialek.

"Sal"

Who has deceiv'd thee so oft as thy self?

Comes to mind.


Very good!

"Sal"

On Friday, June 29, 2012 9:01:25 PM UTC-5, W5DXP wrote:
Yes, indeed, they were ignorant of the standard model of quantum physics but they had a good excuse for their ignorance. What is your excuse?

Speaking of the standard model:

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories...07-02-09-27-46
--
73, Cecil, w5dxp.com