Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 9th 05, 08:40 PM
Antonio Vernucci
 
Posts: n/a
Default Help with MFJ Antenna Analyzr

This post may be a bit OT, but I believe this is the forum where I can =
get some useful information.

I have an MFJ-259B antenna analyzer which works fine. I also have an =
MFJ-269 (the one also working on UHF) which instead gives me odd results =
on the HF bands.

I then sent the 269 back to MFJ for warranty repair, and when it came =
back it had exactly the same problem, despite I gave them a very =
detailed explanation of the problem.

In summary the problem is the following:

- loading the MFJ-269 with 50 ohm all is OK (it gives R=3D50, X=3D0)
- loading it with a different value, say a small 200 ohm carbon resistor =
with very short leads, it gives R=3D200, X=3D0 at around 10 MHz but, =
LOWERING the frequency (e.g. down to 3.5 MHz), it progressively shows an =
higher and higher X value. This result is clearly wrong as a resistor =
having 0 reactance at 10 MHz cannot show reactance at 3.5 MHz. This is =
confirmed by the the fact the MFJ-259 loaded with the same resistor =
shows X=3D0 at 3.5 MHz! So, no question about that!

Interesting to note that the MFJ-269 Product Review on QST magazine (May =
2005 issue, Table 3) shows EXACTLY the same problem! A 269 design =
problem which does not exist in the 259?

Reading the MFJ-269 factory calibration procedure (I have a copy of it), =
they instruct the operator to adjust the instrument at 10 MHz. And at 10 =
MHz it works fine!=20

Has anyone carried out a similar test?

Thanks & 73

Tony I0JX (also K0JX when in the US)


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 14th 05, 07:29 PM
Steve Nosko
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I did some playing with mine after getting it, but didn't see anything like
this. I did pretty much the same things, as I recall.

HOWEVER, I did notice that going into the advanced mode and setting it for
ZO of 75 ohms that is didn't report SWR correctly (should be 1:1 w/75 ohms
attached and it still said 1.5 as though it still was thinking 50 ohms). I
called and the "tech" who answered clearly didn't understand (said return
it) and I elected to drop it since it worked ok otherwise.


I'll try to find some time to re-check this issue.

73, Steve, K9DCI


"Antonio Vernucci" wrote in message
...
This post may be a bit OT, but I believe this is the forum where I can get
some useful information.

I have an MFJ-259B antenna analyzer which works fine. I also have an MFJ-269
(the one also working on UHF) which instead gives me odd results on the HF
bands.

I then sent the 269 back to MFJ for warranty repair, and when it came back
it had exactly the same problem, despite I gave them a very detailed
explanation of the problem.

In summary the problem is the following:

- loading the MFJ-269 with 50 ohm all is OK (it gives R=50, X=0)
- loading it with a different value, say a small 200 ohm carbon resistor
with very short leads, it gives R=200, X=0 at around 10 MHz but, LOWERING
the frequency (e.g. down to 3.5 MHz), it progressively shows an higher and
higher X value. This result is clearly wrong as a resistor having 0
reactance at 10 MHz cannot show reactance at 3.5 MHz. This is confirmed by
the the fact the MFJ-259 loaded with the same resistor shows X=0 at 3.5 MHz!
So, no question about that!

Interesting to note that the MFJ-269 Product Review on QST magazine (May
2005 issue, Table 3) shows EXACTLY the same problem! A 269 design problem
which does not exist in the 259?

Reading the MFJ-269 factory calibration procedure (I have a copy of it),
they instruct the operator to adjust the instrument at 10 MHz. And at 10 MHz
it works fine!

Has anyone carried out a similar test?

Thanks & 73

Tony I0JX (also K0JX when in the US)



  #3   Report Post  
Old October 14th 05, 08:56 PM
Antonio Vernucci
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Steve,

from what you write I presume you have the 269, not the 259B (which =
works fine).

As you are the only person who answered me, if you have time could you =
please re- check your 269 by loading it with a resistor in the range 150 =
to 200 ohm, verifying that the reactance (X) indication remains nearly =
zero when varying frequency in range 2 to 10 MHz.

The only 269s I know are mine and the one tested by ARRL on QST. And =
both of them have a problem. So, if yours does not show that problem, =
then I have some hope

73

Tony I0JX


"Steve Nosko" ha scritto nel =
messaggio ...
I did some playing with mine after getting it, but didn't see anything =

like
this. I did pretty much the same things, as I recall.
=20
HOWEVER, I did notice that going into the advanced mode and setting it =

for
ZO of 75 ohms that is didn't report SWR correctly (should be 1:1 w/75 =

ohms
attached and it still said 1.5 as though it still was thinking 50 =

ohms). I
called and the "tech" who answered clearly didn't understand (said =

return
it) and I elected to drop it since it worked ok otherwise.
=20
=20
I'll try to find some time to re-check this issue.
=20
73, Steve, K9DCI
=20
=20
"Antonio Vernucci" wrote in message
...
This post may be a bit OT, but I believe this is the forum where I can =

get
some useful information.
=20
I have an MFJ-259B antenna analyzer which works fine. I also have an =

MFJ-269
(the one also working on UHF) which instead gives me odd results on =

the HF
bands.
=20
I then sent the 269 back to MFJ for warranty repair, and when it came =

back
it had exactly the same problem, despite I gave them a very detailed
explanation of the problem.
=20
In summary the problem is the following:
=20
- loading the MFJ-269 with 50 ohm all is OK (it gives R=3D50, X=3D0)
- loading it with a different value, say a small 200 ohm carbon =

resistor
with very short leads, it gives R=3D200, X=3D0 at around 10 MHz but, =

LOWERING
the frequency (e.g. down to 3.5 MHz), it progressively shows an higher =

and
higher X value. This result is clearly wrong as a resistor having 0
reactance at 10 MHz cannot show reactance at 3.5 MHz. This is =

confirmed by
the the fact the MFJ-259 loaded with the same resistor shows X=3D0 at =

3.5 MHz!
So, no question about that!
=20
Interesting to note that the MFJ-269 Product Review on QST magazine =

(May
2005 issue, Table 3) shows EXACTLY the same problem! A 269 design =

problem
which does not exist in the 259?
=20
Reading the MFJ-269 factory calibration procedure (I have a copy of =

it),
they instruct the operator to adjust the instrument at 10 MHz. And at =

10 MHz
it works fine!
=20
Has anyone carried out a similar test?
=20
Thanks & 73
=20
Tony I0JX (also K0JX when in the US)
=20
=20

  #4   Report Post  
Old October 17th 05, 09:53 PM
Steve Nosko
 
Posts: n/a
Default Help with MFJ Antenna Analyzr

Roger doger Antonio.

Guess I _didn't_ really look @ this back when I got it. SO...I did two
things with the same problem showing up. I even remember looking over the
QST comparisons and seeing some of the modles WORSE than the MFJ, but now
that I think of it I don't remember fi it was the 259 or the 296 they tested
nor so long ago. I probably figured they were the same bridge...


I used Huber Suhner 50 ohm loads (really good 50 ohm loads).

From 1.4 to 70 MhZ ( just flipped the 269 range switch) they show 49-51 ohms
and not more than 1-2 ohms X. All in the series representation (Rs + Xs)
Put 4 in parallel for a good 12.5 ohm load and at 4 and 1.9 I see 3-4 ohms
of X. this is 25% of R !!

Then, I got an old 1/4 W. carbon comp 180 ohm resistor. At 10 it showed
quite close to 180 ohms. I believe it was 176 and around 25 ohms X However
it showed up to 70-some ohms of X at 4 AND 1.9 MHz (same at both
frequencies). Again around 25% of R.

Being an RF electrical Engineer, I never expected this thing to be right on.
I only figures it would get me in the right direction and let me know when I
was in a "relatively small" 50 ohm circle. However, you are right. This
seems to be quite poor. You'd think you'd see poorer accuracy higher in
freq.

73, Steve, K,9'D;C.I


"Antonio Vernucci" wrote in message
...
Steve,

from what you write I presume you have the 269, not the 259B (which works
fine).

As you are the only person who answered me, if you have time could you
please re- check your 269 by loading it with a resistor in the range 150 to
200 ohm, verifying that the reactance (X) indication remains nearly zero
when varying frequency in range 2 to 10 MHz.

The only 269s I know are mine and the one tested by ARRL on QST. And both of
them have a problem. So, if yours does not show that problem, then I have
some hope

73

Tony I0JX


"Steve Nosko" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
I did some playing with mine after getting it, but didn't see anything

like
this. I did pretty much the same things, as I recall.

HOWEVER, I did notice that going into the advanced mode and setting it for
ZO of 75 ohms that is didn't report SWR correctly (should be 1:1 w/75 ohms
attached and it still said 1.5 as though it still was thinking 50 ohms).

I
called and the "tech" who answered clearly didn't understand (said return
it) and I elected to drop it since it worked ok otherwise.


I'll try to find some time to re-check this issue.

73, Steve, K9DCI


"Antonio Vernucci" wrote in message
...
This post may be a bit OT, but I believe this is the forum where I can get
some useful information.

I have an MFJ-259B antenna analyzer which works fine. I also have an

MFJ-269
(the one also working on UHF) which instead gives me odd results on the HF
bands.

I then sent the 269 back to MFJ for warranty repair, and when it came back
it had exactly the same problem, despite I gave them a very detailed
explanation of the problem.

In summary the problem is the following:

- loading the MFJ-269 with 50 ohm all is OK (it gives R=50, X=0)
- loading it with a different value, say a small 200 ohm carbon resistor
with very short leads, it gives R=200, X=0 at around 10 MHz but, LOWERING
the frequency (e.g. down to 3.5 MHz), it progressively shows an higher and
higher X value. This result is clearly wrong as a resistor having 0
reactance at 10 MHz cannot show reactance at 3.5 MHz. This is confirmed by
the the fact the MFJ-259 loaded with the same resistor shows X=0 at 3.5

MHz!
So, no question about that!

Interesting to note that the MFJ-269 Product Review on QST magazine (May
2005 issue, Table 3) shows EXACTLY the same problem! A 269 design problem
which does not exist in the 259?

Reading the MFJ-269 factory calibration procedure (I have a copy of it),
they instruct the operator to adjust the instrument at 10 MHz. And at 10

MHz
it works fine!

Has anyone carried out a similar test?

Thanks & 73

Tony I0JX (also K0JX when in the US)





Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Imax ground plane question Vinnie S. CB 151 April 15th 05 05:21 AM
Discone antenna plans [email protected] Antenna 13 January 15th 05 12:51 AM
Yaesu FT-857D questions Joe S. Equipment 6 October 25th 04 09:40 AM
LongWire Antenna Jim B Shortwave 5 March 2nd 04 10:36 AM
EH Antenna Revisited Walter Maxwell Antenna 47 January 16th 04 05:34 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:03 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017