[gareth]

"gareth" wrote in message
...
"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
My comments were banter

Suggesting that my wife was a sheep in the bed next to me, do you mean?

...and then, when it became apparent to you that your remarks had given
great offence why did you not apologise for them if they were just banter?

Why did you have me arrested for pressing you for an apology; that alone
suggests the earnestness behind your intention to want to insult, an
earnestness that continues to today, going by your current posts

[gareth]

"Brian Reay" wrote in message
...
As for stalking, Steve is free to post in any newsgroup (and join any
Yahoo
group, not having been blacklisted). I'm sure he has never been issued
with
any kind of order for harassment, restraining order, or convicted of an
offence related in anyway to malicious communications. Not even a Caution.
Of course, the same applies to myself.

Bian, M3OSN, Old Chum, you've stirred up a right hornets' nest with the
Yanks
with your obsession about sheep and the aftermath of that obsession.

Please be more circumspect in the future.

[DrTeeth]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:10:29 -0000, just as I was about to take a
herb, "gareth" disturbed my reverie and
wrote:

..and then, when it became apparent to you that your remarks had given
great offence why did you not apologise for them if they were just banter?

If you were offended, that is your problem and your issue.
--
Cheers,

DrT

** You've never known happiness until you're married;
** but by then it is too late.

[gareth]

"DrTeeth" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 13:10:29 -0000, just as I was about to take a
herb, "gareth" disturbed my reverie and
wrote:

..and then, when it became apparent to you that your remarks had given
great offence why did you not apologise for them if they were just banter?

If you were offended, that is your problem and your issue.

Stupid boy

[mw/3/[email protected]]

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:14:44 +0000, Spike
wrote:

Stephen, you forgot to add .space, .policy, and .dx to the
rec.radio.amateur.* groups in your canvass for support outside of the UK
for the proposed UK group, and free.uk.amateur-radio is also missing
from your list.

What about uk.rec.gardening too?

I'm sure one or two radio people keep an eye on that ng too.

[Michael Black[_2_]]

On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:14:44 +0000, Spike
wrote:

Stephen, you forgot to add .space, .policy, and .dx to the
rec.radio.amateur.* groups in your canvass for support outside of the UK
for the proposed UK group, and free.uk.amateur-radio is also missing
from your list.

What about uk.rec.gardening too?

I'm sure one or two radio people keep an eye on that ng too.


He seems to be doing searches.

He posted today in comp.misc (I think it was), when the only mention of
amateur radio is that "the rec.radio.amateur.* hierarchy seems in good
shape"; I remember replying to that message saying "look again, most of
the messages are write only taken from the web".

Michael

[Stephen Thomas Cole[_3_]]

Michael Black wrote:
On Fri, 12 Dec 2014, wrote:

On Thu, 27 Nov 2014 09:14:44 +0000, Spike
wrote:

Stephen, you forgot to add .space, .policy, and .dx to the
rec.radio.amateur.* groups in your canvass for support outside of the UK
for the proposed UK group, and free.uk.amateur-radio is also missing
from your list.

What about uk.rec.gardening too?

I'm sure one or two radio people keep an eye on that ng too.


He seems to be doing searches.


Nah, I'm subscribed to both the groups you mention.

--
Stephen Thomas Cole // Sent from my iPhone