Anyone got any good frequencies aside from the ham bands that send good CW?
I'm tyring to get my code speed up after years dormancy.
tnx
han wd5jfr

Henry, I'd recommend the G4FON program. It's even better!

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, MN
"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
...
| Anyone got any good frequencies aside from the ham bands that send good
CW?
| I'm tyring to get my code speed up after years dormancy.
| tnx
| han wd5jfr
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.557 / Virus Database: 349 - Release Date: 12/30/03

I have it, and it's neat and unique but I want to copy real information.
73
hank wd5jfr
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
nk.net...
Henry, I'd recommend the G4FON program. It's even better!

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, MN
"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
...
| Anyone got any good frequencies aside from the ham bands that send good
CW?
| I'm tyring to get my code speed up after years dormancy.
| tnx
| han wd5jfr
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.557 / Virus Database: 349 - Release Date: 12/30/03

How about W1AW code practice bulletins from the ARRL? See freqs and times at
the ARRL website:

http://www.arrl.org/w1aw.html#w1awsked

Jackie

"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
...
I have it, and it's neat and unique but I want to copy real information.
73
hank wd5jfr
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
nk.net...
Henry, I'd recommend the G4FON program. It's even better!

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, MN
"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
...
| Anyone got any good frequencies aside from the ham bands that send
good
CW?
| I'm tyring to get my code speed up after years dormancy.
| tnx
| han wd5jfr
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.557 / Virus Database: 349 - Release Date: 12/30/03

The best practice is to get on and work someone. Even if it's a buddy down the
street.

Good Luck!

jw
wb9uai

Henry,

Simple enough...go to your favorite news source on the web and cut and paste
an article into the Koch trainer.


"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
...
I have it, and it's neat and unique but I want to copy real information.
73
hank wd5jfr
"Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message
nk.net...
Henry, I'd recommend the G4FON program. It's even better!

73,

Steve Lawrence
Burnsville, MN
"Henry Kolesnik" wrote in message
...
| Anyone got any good frequencies aside from the ham bands that send
good
CW?
| I'm tyring to get my code speed up after years dormancy.
| tnx
| han wd5jfr
|
|


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.557 / Virus Database: 349 - Release Date: 12/30/03

(J999w) wrote in message ...
The best practice is to get on and work someone. Even if it's a buddy down the
street.

Good Luck!

jw
wb9uai

I agree. I think his speed would pick up faster. Gets double duty
practice having to send also. Also brushes up the fist.. But if only
listening, W1AW is good. Perfect code...But anyone on the band that he
can copy will do. It's kind of a shame most don't really use the
novice bands much anymore. Makes it harder to find slower code. But
some still get on there. MK

Speaking of CW... I read recently that the ITU is coming up with a unique code
for the @ sign. I believe it's .--.-. (didadadidadit, i.e., A and C sent as
one).

73,
Bill, K5BY

Just take a listen on any of the ham bands in the CW portion.
--
Please remove NOSPAM to reply
Henry Kolesnik wrote in message
...
Anyone got any good frequencies aside from the ham bands that send good
CW?
I'm tyring to get my code speed up after years dormancy.
tnx
han wd5jfr

Bill [K5BY],

1. I would have logically thought that the "@" Sign would have
been represented as "A" (.-) and "T" (-) for [AT] (.--) Prosign.

but, But. BUT ! (.--) is already used for "W".

Oh... NEVER MIND !

TBL: So the Prosign "AC" (.--.-.) will be the "@" Sign in CW.


2. I would think that the "DOT" (Period) would simply be the
* CW "Period" (.-.-.-) {6}
* Vice Spelling Out "DOT" in CW as (-.. --- -) {9}


3. Question: How is the [World Wide Web] Anagram "WWW" sent ?
? Simply as "W W W" (.-- .-- .--) the three separate Letters.
? Or simply as "www" (.--.--.--) a compress 'www' Prosign.


ow... ~ RHF
= = = One Wonders... and Begins to Think !
..
..
= = = (WShoots1)
= = = wrote in message ...

Speaking of CW...

I read recently that the ITU is coming
up with a unique code for the @ sign.

I believe it's .--.-.
(didadadidadit, i.e., A and C sent as one).

73,
Bill, K5BY

..

..