[[email protected]]

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:14:14 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 5:00 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:52:55 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 4:27 PM, wrote:

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

Jim is clearly a jerk and only here for the drama, but I don't think you
can say you are not participating by replying to every stupid post he
makes to you.

You have the ability to just ignore him you know.

--

Rick C

Obviously I have articulated my motivation yesterday

Yes, you said "No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal
archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with
resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. "

But so far I have only seen a bunch of irrational posts in reply to the
ignorant posts of others.

Your continued replies to stupid posts only serves to make you look
worse. At this point I think you are as bad as Jim and only here for
the drama. Certainly you aren't doing any good for fractal antennas.

--

Rick C

Pleasure to hear from you again, Rick.

Both fractal antennas, and I, are doing very well, thank you!:-)

I did fractal antennas a big favor (since you insist in anthropomorphizing them)by debunking a nonsense set of claims. I thought you might enjoy this video and how skepticism thus works with science to vanquish silly claims--in this case that fractal antennas don't work as well or better.

Enjoy my friend!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9MgKck0z0&t=2s

Best,
Nathan Cohen

[rickman]

On 4/26/2017 5:26 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:14:14 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 5:00 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:52:55 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 4:27 PM, wrote:

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

Jim is clearly a jerk and only here for the drama, but I don't think you
can say you are not participating by replying to every stupid post he
makes to you.

You have the ability to just ignore him you know.

--

Rick C

Obviously I have articulated my motivation yesterday

Yes, you said "No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal
archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with
resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. "

But so far I have only seen a bunch of irrational posts in reply to the
ignorant posts of others.

Your continued replies to stupid posts only serves to make you look
worse. At this point I think you are as bad as Jim and only here for
the drama. Certainly you aren't doing any good for fractal antennas.

--

Rick C

Pleasure to hear from you again, Rick.

Both fractal antennas, and I, are doing very well, thank you!:-)

I did fractal antennas a big favor (since you insist in anthropomorphizing them)by debunking a nonsense set of claims. I thought you might enjoy this video and how skepticism thus works with science to vanquish silly claims--in this case that fractal antennas don't work as well or better.

Enjoy my friend!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9MgKck0z0&t=2s

Wonderful! But you are not doing fractal antennas any favors by your
increasingly irrational posts here. I see you are now posting
information about Jim for an unknown reason.

I believe you are pretty nuts. Clearly you don't respond to reason. I
think I'm done responding to you.

--

Rick C

[[email protected]]

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:15:23 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:01:30 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:46:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 8:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Fractenna wrote:
FWIW, consider this my last word on the subject of your safety and
well-being. From now on, I will assert my 1st Amendment right to be
brilliant, funny, serious, or dumber-than-nine-chickens. Selah.

73, Corry K4DOH


Thanks for your comments Corry;

I can see that you are sincere and being helpful and I am genuinely grateful
for your advice.

However--

Society does not stop on the NG. It is subject to the same rules and points of
law that we are subject to elsewhere.

I have no concern about 'dumb' comments, or anything else of that ilk. I DO
have concerns about the harassment , slander; defamation; and libel that has
occurred--with me made as the target-- and the latest era of genuinely
danger--motivated threats.

I disagree with you, respectfully. There is no reason why we should ACCEPT
such poor behavior when it is meant to harm.

I don't know what you mean by 'troll'. If, by this, you mean that I have been
dedicated to dissemnation of information, you are most certainly correct. But
its YOU--as a thinking and curious person--who makes that decision for him or
her self. I am by no means offended if fractal antennas aren't your cup of tea.

Whether or not you build a fractal antenna is up to you. I certainly do not
feel you should do so because I 'want' you to. You should do it because Corry
'wants' to.

Best 73,
Chip N1IR

This response proves as pertinent today as the day it was said.

17 years later and still a whinny professional victim.


--
Jim Pennino

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

"Mommy, mommy, Jimmy is looking at me."

BTW, I am not 72 years old and there is more than one Jim Pennino in the USA.

--
Jim Pennino

Jim, Apologies if I am in error. Please correct that information. Your age is....

?

Jim, You understand that I am rounding off your age my friend....

Your birthdate is: Sept 11, 1945 That makes you 71 1/2 + years old. You are the James Pennino who lives at:

7741 Lockhaven Court
Rancho Cucamonga, California.

This is from publicly info provided by the government, publicly. I just want to be sure our future readers know the exact Jim Pennino who is commenting, as you are stressing ambiguity in this regard.

Best Wishes,
Nathan Cohen

So Jim,

Have we sufficiently resolved the issue of which Jim Pennino is commenting? Is any of the demographic info factually in error?

Perhaps, to further understand your perspective, readers might wish to know your education and technical background. Could you be so kind as to provide that?

Best,
Nathan Cohen

[[email protected]]

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:34:02 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 5:26 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:14:14 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 5:00 PM, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:52:55 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/26/2017 4:27 PM, wrote:

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

Jim is clearly a jerk and only here for the drama, but I don't think you
can say you are not participating by replying to every stupid post he
makes to you.

You have the ability to just ignore him you know.

--

Rick C

Obviously I have articulated my motivation yesterday

Yes, you said "No. Ignoring such comments in the age of eternal
archiving doesn't work. Its CYBERBULLYING. I am a very sane person with
resources behind me. I am in a position to stop it. "

But so far I have only seen a bunch of irrational posts in reply to the
ignorant posts of others.

Your continued replies to stupid posts only serves to make you look
worse. At this point I think you are as bad as Jim and only here for
the drama. Certainly you aren't doing any good for fractal antennas.

--

Rick C

Pleasure to hear from you again, Rick.

Both fractal antennas, and I, are doing very well, thank you!:-)

I did fractal antennas a big favor (since you insist in anthropomorphizing them)by debunking a nonsense set of claims. I thought you might enjoy this video and how skepticism thus works with science to vanquish silly claims--in this case that fractal antennas don't work as well or better.

Enjoy my friend!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK9MgKck0z0&t=2s

Wonderful! But you are not doing fractal antennas any favors by your
increasingly irrational posts here. I see you are now posting
information about Jim for an unknown reason.

I believe you are pretty nuts. Clearly you don't respond to reason. I
think I'm done responding to you.

--

Rick C

Hi Rick,

Again, thanks for your comments.

Its always helpful for those who are trying to learn, to understand the background and perspective of others. Surely you understand that.

I do suspect that others will be puzzled by your accusation of mental issues, especially since I have none; have no demonstrable medical history of mental illness; am a fine, happy, and productive member of society; take no drugs or medications (pretty good for 62!);and enjoy the company of others.

Stop and be friendly (to borrow from Steven Spielberg).:-)

[[email protected]]

On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 7:52:12 PM UTC-4, rickman wrote:
On 4/25/2017 7:05 PM, wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Fractenna wrote:
FWIW, consider this my last word on the subject of your safety and
well-being. From now on, I will assert my 1st Amendment right to be
brilliant, funny, serious, or dumber-than-nine-chickens. Selah.

73, Corry K4DOH


Thanks for your comments Corry;

I can see that you are sincere and being helpful and I am genuinely grateful
for your advice.

However--

Society does not stop on the NG. It is subject to the same rules and points of
law that we are subject to elsewhere.

I have no concern about 'dumb' comments, or anything else of that ilk. I DO
have concerns about the harassment , slander; defamation; and libel that has
occurred--with me made as the target-- and the latest era of genuinely
danger--motivated threats.

I disagree with you, respectfully. There is no reason why we should ACCEPT
such poor behavior when it is meant to harm.

I don't know what you mean by 'troll'. If, by this, you mean that I have been
dedicated to dissemnation of information, you are most certainly correct. But
its YOU--as a thinking and curious person--who makes that decision for him or
her self. I am by no means offended if fractal antennas aren't your cup of tea.

Whether or not you build a fractal antenna is up to you. I certainly do not
feel you should do so because I 'want' you to. You should do it because Corry
'wants' to.

Best 73,
Chip N1IR

This response proves as pertinent today as the day it was said.

Is this guy another Gareth? I haven't seen him post anything that
wasn't about the crap in the newsgroup rather than anything on topic.
At this point his posts complaining about the crap in the group have
become part of the crap in the group.

Apparently without posting anything in a *long* time, he was resurrected
by a single mention of his first name. Wow! Beetlejuice has nothing on
him. I'm not sure Gareth does either.

--

Rick C

Hello Rick,

I do not know who this 'Gareth' is. Should I? You make it sound like I am supposed to regard him with disdain.

Before I inherit that opinion of Mr. Gareth,what, exactly is the factually verifiable transgression or transgressions this person allegedly inveighed against others?

Why is it pertinent or relevant to compare me to this 'Gareth'?

Is he a radio astronomer?

A Ph.D.?

An entrepreneur?

An inventor?

An antenna expert?

Please tell us how the two of us have commonalities.

Your friend,
Nathan Cohen

[[email protected]]

wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:46:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 8:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Fractenna wrote:
FWIW, consider this my last word on the subject of your safety and
well-being. From now on, I will assert my 1st Amendment right to be
brilliant, funny, serious, or dumber-than-nine-chickens. Selah.

73, Corry K4DOH


Thanks for your comments Corry;

I can see that you are sincere and being helpful and I am genuinely grateful
for your advice.

However--

Society does not stop on the NG. It is subject to the same rules and points of
law that we are subject to elsewhere.

I have no concern about 'dumb' comments, or anything else of that ilk. I DO
have concerns about the harassment , slander; defamation; and libel that has
occurred--with me made as the target-- and the latest era of genuinely
danger--motivated threats.

I disagree with you, respectfully. There is no reason why we should ACCEPT
such poor behavior when it is meant to harm.

I don't know what you mean by 'troll'. If, by this, you mean that I have been
dedicated to dissemnation of information, you are most certainly correct. But
its YOU--as a thinking and curious person--who makes that decision for him or
her self. I am by no means offended if fractal antennas aren't your cup of tea.

Whether or not you build a fractal antenna is up to you. I certainly do not
feel you should do so because I 'want' you to. You should do it because Corry
'wants' to.

Best 73,
Chip N1IR

This response proves as pertinent today as the day it was said.

17 years later and still a whinny professional victim.


--
Jim Pennino

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

"Mommy, mommy, Jimmy is looking at me."

BTW, I am not 72 years old and there is more than one Jim Pennino in the USA.

--
Jim Pennino

Jim, Apologies if I am in error. Please correct that information. Your age is....

?

Why are you obsessed with knowing personal information?

--
Jim Pennino

[[email protected]]

wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:01:30 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:46:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 8:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Fractenna wrote:
FWIW, consider this my last word on the subject of your safety and
well-being. From now on, I will assert my 1st Amendment right to be
brilliant, funny, serious, or dumber-than-nine-chickens. Selah.

73, Corry K4DOH


Thanks for your comments Corry;

I can see that you are sincere and being helpful and I am genuinely grateful
for your advice.

However--

Society does not stop on the NG. It is subject to the same rules and points of
law that we are subject to elsewhere.

I have no concern about 'dumb' comments, or anything else of that ilk. I DO
have concerns about the harassment , slander; defamation; and libel that has
occurred--with me made as the target-- and the latest era of genuinely
danger--motivated threats.

I disagree with you, respectfully. There is no reason why we should ACCEPT
such poor behavior when it is meant to harm.

I don't know what you mean by 'troll'. If, by this, you mean that I have been
dedicated to dissemnation of information, you are most certainly correct. But
its YOU--as a thinking and curious person--who makes that decision for him or
her self. I am by no means offended if fractal antennas aren't your cup of tea.

Whether or not you build a fractal antenna is up to you. I certainly do not
feel you should do so because I 'want' you to. You should do it because Corry
'wants' to.

Best 73,
Chip N1IR

This response proves as pertinent today as the day it was said.

17 years later and still a whinny professional victim.


--
Jim Pennino

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

"Mommy, mommy, Jimmy is looking at me."

BTW, I am not 72 years old and there is more than one Jim Pennino in the USA.

--
Jim Pennino

Jim, Apologies if I am in error. Please correct that information. Your age is....

?

Jim, You understand that I am rounding off your age my friend....

Your birthdate is: Sept 11, 1945 That makes you 71 1/2 + years old. You are the James Pennino who lives at:

7741 Lockhaven Court
Rancho Cucamonga, California.

This is from publicly info provided by the government, publicly. I just want to be sure our future readers know the exact Jim Pennino who is commenting, as you are stressing ambiguity in this regard.

Best Wishes,
Nathan Cohen

Grow up child.

--
Jim Pennino

[[email protected]]

wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:15:23 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 5:01:30 PM UTC-4, wrote:
On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 4:46:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Tuesday, April 25, 2017 at 8:16:03 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:
On Thursday, April 6, 2000 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-4, Fractenna wrote:
FWIW, consider this my last word on the subject of your safety and
well-being. From now on, I will assert my 1st Amendment right to be
brilliant, funny, serious, or dumber-than-nine-chickens. Selah.

73, Corry K4DOH


Thanks for your comments Corry;

I can see that you are sincere and being helpful and I am genuinely grateful
for your advice.

However--

Society does not stop on the NG. It is subject to the same rules and points of
law that we are subject to elsewhere.

I have no concern about 'dumb' comments, or anything else of that ilk. I DO
have concerns about the harassment , slander; defamation; and libel that has
occurred--with me made as the target-- and the latest era of genuinely
danger--motivated threats.

I disagree with you, respectfully. There is no reason why we should ACCEPT
such poor behavior when it is meant to harm.

I don't know what you mean by 'troll'. If, by this, you mean that I have been
dedicated to dissemnation of information, you are most certainly correct. But
its YOU--as a thinking and curious person--who makes that decision for him or
her self. I am by no means offended if fractal antennas aren't your cup of tea.

Whether or not you build a fractal antenna is up to you. I certainly do not
feel you should do so because I 'want' you to. You should do it because Corry
'wants' to.

Best 73,
Chip N1IR

This response proves as pertinent today as the day it was said.

17 years later and still a whinny professional victim.


--
Jim Pennino

Thanks for showing your cyberbully core, to the future, Jim. This person is 72 year old Jim Pennino , ARS callsign (2017) WB6DKH. You can trace his history of statements.

"Mommy, mommy, Jimmy is looking at me."

BTW, I am not 72 years old and there is more than one Jim Pennino in the USA.

--
Jim Pennino

Jim, Apologies if I am in error. Please correct that information. Your age is....

?

Jim, You understand that I am rounding off your age my friend....

Your birthdate is: Sept 11, 1945 That makes you 71 1/2 + years old. You are the James Pennino who lives at:

7741 Lockhaven Court
Rancho Cucamonga, California.

This is from publicly info provided by the government, publicly. I just want to be sure our future readers know the exact Jim Pennino who is commenting, as you are stressing ambiguity in this regard.

Best Wishes,
Nathan Cohen

So Jim,

Have we sufficiently resolved the issue of which Jim Pennino is commenting? Is any of the demographic info factually in error?

Perhaps, to further understand your perspective, readers might wish to know your education and technical background. Could you be so kind as to provide that?

Best,
Nathan Cohen

Grow up child.


--
Jim Pennino

[[email protected]]

wrote:

Please tell us how the two of us have commonalities.

You are both emotionally immature in your dealings with others.

Hope that helps.

Of course you could always do a web search as you no doubt did with me,
drooling and mumbling to yourself how you will show everyone.

--
Jim Pennino

[[email protected]]

On Wednesday, April 26, 2017 at 7:31:07 PM UTC-4, wrote:
wrote:

Please tell us how the two of us have commonalities.

You are both emotionally immature in your dealings with others.

Hope that helps.

Of course you could always do a web search as you no doubt did with me,
drooling and mumbling to yourself how you will show everyone.

--
Jim Pennino

Jim,

At 62 I still harbor a little bit of immaturity, manifest as the joy and curiosity of the young. And I do hope to hold onto it, with luck, until I reach your age (71 1/2) or longer. It is so sad to find others in the glass coffin of hate and bitterness. I hope I never get there.

I am sorry that the joy of discovery and the company of friends is no longer, it would seem, able to bring you happiness. But I wish you the best in each tomorrow that follows.

Remember: the sun is but a morning star!

Your friend,
Nathan Cohen