Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #61   Report Post  
Old June 15th 04, 12:39 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't
care if other people posting from the other
rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are
you guys from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to
behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I
want to know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.


You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it.

What a bozo.


You posted to a public forum. As a matter of fact, you CROSS posted
the three groups, including the one I normally read. RAR+P.


Yeah. Since you and the other bozos started cross posting I don't know
which group you post from or read. Sure I could subscribe to the other
groups and figure it out but why bother.

You did not address your posting to anyone in particular, other than
the people in RAT and RAR+P.


Yeah I did. I responded to you idiot. You must smoke up a large cloud
before posting.

However, you specifically asked if "we" were going to stop. The
answer is no.


I told you I'm through asking you to stop bozo. Got a reading
comprehension problem.

The simple fact is that nobody really gives a damn what you think.


Your disregard for anyone else's desire noted.

Nobody gives a damn about you either.

Although this is a public forum I doubt anyone cares what you think
either.

Flame all you want.


Thanks for your permission. If I had found the Trolling spoke person for
rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes it would have saved some
time. What took you so long.

Oh well water over the dam and all that.

So what use does a pot smoking idiot with reading comprehension problems
have for tubes, phono's or antiques anyway? I think a person of your
caliber would have no use for any of it other than sniffing the varnish
or glue used to restore the stuff.


Amen.


  #62   Report Post  
Old June 15th 04, 12:39 PM
Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill
wrote:


Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.



Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?


All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all three
groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the denizens
of each one.

Rgds,
Bill
  #64   Report Post  
Old June 15th 04, 01:05 PM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , Bill
wrote:

Telamon wrote:
In article , Bill
wrote:


Telamon wrote:

This is it guys I'm not asking again.


WHEW! I guess that means you'll stop being a pest.



Just the opposite Bill. How are things in PR?


All's well. Lighten up, Telamon. This is a good topic for all
three groups and could use some input from the vantage point of the
denizens of each one.


We all have our limitations Bill.

I'm doing my best to endear myself to the fine people cross posting from
rec.antiques.radio+phono and rec.audio.tubes.

Sure hope I've made a good impression with them.

You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it?

I don't know why these threads don't get cross posted to several other
dozen newsgroups that have radio in the title. I think the amateur
groups would benefit from these threads. Those people are interested in
BS and radio design after all. Seems like a good fit to me.

Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave
since the Bryant hiatus.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #65   Report Post  
Old June 15th 04, 01:12 PM
Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Telamon wrote:

In article , Bill
wrote:

You used to have a web page with the radios you restored. Still have it?


Yes, http://www.sparkbench.com Most of the sets have tubes and SW so
its "on topic" for this crossposting.
:-)


Here I was all worried what was going to happen to rec.radio.shorwave
since the Bryant hiatus.


Don't worry unless you have a Llloyd and Bryant hiatus at the same time.

-BM


  #66   Report Post  
Old June 15th 04, 01:47 PM
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.


Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.


I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.


I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.


Heck, post it again!


  #67   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 02:01 AM
John Barnard
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Telamon can't help it - he's bucking to be the next Fuhrer! "Post this! Don't
post that! Don't disagree with me otherwise you are a troll!". I would just
bet that he does a wonderful goose-step while trying to re-write FAQ's.

Keep on posting, guys! It's all part of the hobby.

Regards

John Barnard

Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

In article ,
Jeffrey D Angus wrote:

Telamon wrote:

I don't care about your opinion and did not ask for it. I don't care if
other people posting from the other rec.antiques.radio+phono or
rec.audio.tubes think as you do.

I'm not interested in a debate about cross posting.

I have made a repeated, polite requests for this to stop so are you guys
from rec.antiques.radio+phono or rec.audio.tubes going to behave or not?

Please respond as to whether you will stop or not that's all I want to
know.

This is it guys I'm not asking again.

Can we have that in writing?

'Cause the simple answer is we ain't going to stop cross posting
just because YOU have YOUR knickers in a knot.



You a moron or something? Did I speak to you or did you READ it.

What a bozo.


You posted to a public forum. As a matter of fact, you CROSS posted
the three groups, including the one I normally read. RAR+P.

You did not address your posting to anyone in particular, other than
the people in RAT and RAR+P.

However, you specifically asked if "we" were going to stop. The
answer is no.

The simple fact is that nobody really gives a damn what you think.

Flame all you want.

Jeff

--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." Benjamin Franklin
"A life lived in fear is a life half lived."
Tara Morice as Fran, from the movie "Strictly Ballroom"


  #68   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 03:34 AM
Telamon
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.

Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.


I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.


Heck, post it again!


Some people just don't know how to play nice.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California
  #69   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 07:44 AM
Steven Dinius
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Telamon wrote in message ...
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.


Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.

I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.


Heck, post it again!


Some people just don't know how to play nice.


You couldn't have said it better it yourself. Most of the sex groups
are in alt. Go jerk off in that corner.
  #70   Report Post  
Old June 16th 04, 07:44 AM
Steven Dinius
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Telamon wrote in message ...
In article ,
dxAce wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 05:44:35 GMT, Telamon
wrote:

In article ,
Jon Noring wrote:

I'm the one who started and cross-posted the related topics (of
building a tube-based AM receiver) to the three newsgroups, including
rec.radio.shortwave.


Nevertheless, I believe the threads are sufficiently on-topic to
r.r.s. to not warrant some pro-active effort to try to stop.

I've sent a complaint to your news provider. We will see if they think
the same way you do.

I just sent two complaints to about Telamon trying
to disrupt an on-topic discussion. I suggest everyone involved in
this thread do the same. Include a complete, abusive or threatening
messsage from Telamon including headers. They're not hard to find.


Heck, post it again!


Some people just don't know how to play nice.


You couldn't have said it better it yourself. Most of the sex groups
are in alt. Go jerk off in that corner.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 06:41 PM
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade Gene Gardner Homebrew 2 January 15th 04 03:17 AM
Drake TR-3 transceiver synthesizer upgrade Gene Gardner Homebrew 0 January 13th 04 06:28 PM
a page of motorola 2way 2 way portable and mobile radio history john private smith Policy 0 December 22nd 03 03:42 AM
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? lbbs Antenna 16 December 13th 03 04:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017