Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 01:04 AM
nukem
 
Posts: n/a
Default A REAL" RF AMPLIFIER"

THESE AMPLIFIER ARE NOT THE JUNK MOST CB USERS ARE BUYING.

VIEW HERE TO SEE A REAL RF AMPLIFIER:

http://www.worth-more.com/


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 01:22 AM
(Scott Unit 69)
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"nukem" wrote:
THESE AMPLIFIER ARE NOT THE JUNK MOST CB USERS ARE BUYING.

VIEW HERE TO SEE A REAL RF AMPLIFIER:

http://www.worth-more.com/



Riley needs to look into this guy.



  #3   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 01:33 AM
Train
 
Posts: n/a
Default

$1229 for am 8 pill amp?
**** HIM!
Train
"nukem" wrote in message
m...
THESE AMPLIFIER ARE NOT THE JUNK MOST CB USERS ARE BUYING.

VIEW HERE TO SEE A REAL RF AMPLIFIER:

http://www.worth-more.com/




  #4   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 04:11 AM
BuckEye
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Looks like the rest of the junkie Amps.

PC boards are not silked screened, and no soldermask on it ither. Looks like
they are eatched in the kitchen sink. No band pass filter.
No swr protection. Seen one seen then all.
Another CB amp.
How about WorthLess amps.


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 05:10 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 03:11:06 GMT, "BuckEye" wrote:

Looks like the rest of the junkie Amps.

PC boards are not silked screened, and no soldermask on it ither. Looks like
they are eatched in the kitchen sink. No band pass filter.
No swr protection. Seen one seen then all.
Another CB amp.
How about WorthLess amps.

No band pass filtering? Better look again.


  #6   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 08:01 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In , "nukem"
wrote:

THESE AMPLIFIER ARE NOT THE JUNK MOST CB USERS ARE BUYING.

VIEW HERE TO SEE A REAL RF AMPLIFIER:

http://www.worth-more.com/


"Sales Pending FCC Type Acceptance". Gee, how clever....not. We all know that
those amps are never going to get authorization. And "AUX"? Do you really think
the FCC is -that- stupid? What a shame -- an Extra making and selling illegal
amps thinly disguised as "amateur" equipment. No wonder so many would-be hams
choose not to get a license.






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
  #7   Report Post  
Old October 27th 03, 08:44 AM
Idxeleven
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Riley needs to look into this guy.


I believe Riley already has...MN102USA
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 30th 03, 12:51 AM
ALLSTEEL77
 
Posts: n/a
Default

They are ham amps and most approved ham amps have a aux position for mars and
10 meters.
  #9   Report Post  
Old October 30th 03, 05:17 AM
gw
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Frank Gilliland wrote in message . ..
In , "nukem"
wrote:

THESE AMPLIFIER ARE NOT THE JUNK MOST CB USERS ARE BUYING.

VIEW HERE TO SEE A REAL RF AMPLIFIER:

http://www.worth-more.com/


"Sales Pending FCC Type Acceptance". Gee, how clever....not. We all know that
those amps are never going to get authorization. And "AUX"? Do you really think
the FCC is -that- stupid? What a shame -- an Extra making and selling illegal
amps thinly disguised as "amateur" equipment. No wonder so many would-be hams
choose not to get a license.






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----



that's right frankenstein.....and they are almost direct copies of
sonny built amps too......imagine that....a hamster copying a cb amp
........well i never........
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 30th 03, 08:01 AM
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In ,
(ALLSTEEL77) wrote:

They are ham amps and most approved ham amps have a aux position for mars and
10 meters.


Name one.






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Supporting theory that Antennas "Match" to 377 Ohms (Free space) Dr. Slick Antenna 183 October 2nd 20 10:44 AM
Record Real Media Stream Rob Broadcasting 22 March 9th 04 09:09 PM
2m Amplifier Designs Jason Dugas Homebrew 17 January 31st 04 07:42 AM
Reflection Delay is it real??? Peter O. Brackett Antenna 7 September 20th 03 11:55 AM
50 Ohms "Real Resistive" impedance a Misnomer? Dr. Slick Antenna 255 July 29th 03 11:24 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:14 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017