[Tom[_8_]]

Hi

Do you folks have any comments on these new Micro Inverters? Specically the
Enphase M215. I understand there is a new one Enphase M215 IG I believe that
addresses the interference experience by hams on VHF band. These are the
Micro Inverters two suppliers tole me to use that qualify for the Ontario
Microfit program. I reading reviews on Amazon that they are very
interfering. Is there a way of grounding them or a equal alternative model
that doesn't interfere with ham bands during peak sunlight hours? I need to
put 50 of these on my roof under each panel. Any and all comments are
greatly appreciated as always. Thanks Gents,,,

73s

Tom

[Jeff Liebermann[_2_]]

On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:05:54 -0400, "Tom" wrote:

Do you folks have any comments on these new Micro Inverters? Specically the
Enphase M215. I understand there is a new one Enphase M215 IG I believe that
addresses the interference experience by hams on VHF band. These are the
Micro Inverters two suppliers tole me to use that qualify for the Ontario
Microfit program. I reading reviews on Amazon that they are very
interfering. Is there a way of grounding them or a equal alternative model
that doesn't interfere with ham bands during peak sunlight hours? I need to
put 50 of these on my roof under each panel. Any and all comments are
greatly appreciated as always. Thanks Gents,,,

I help maintain a few grid tied solar systems. Most use Enphase micro
inverters. The latest uses M215 IG inverters. Previous models were
totally floating and had no grounding points or fault protection. The
IG means "integrated ground" and also has a built in ground fault
protector. The grounding change probably has nothing to do with
EMI/RFI. There are also Chinese clones of these inverters, which
ended up at one of these systems thanks to a fly-by-night solar
contractor.

My guess(tm) is you're dealing with conducted EMI/RFI, not radiated.
Therefore, clamp on ferrite beads and blocks should work.
http://www.solar-electric.com/installation-parts-and-equipment/electrical-devices-transfer-switches-noise-filters/nosufefi.html
When I complained on behalf of one customer that the inverters were
trashing OTA TV reception, they installed the ferrite beads for free.
I don't think Enphase supplied the ferrites. It's mentioned in their
troubleshooting guide, but nowhere else:
http://www2.enphase.com/global/files/Enphase_Troubleshooting_Guide.pdf
See Pg 22. Note that the filters go as close to the source of the
noise (i.e. the M215 IG micro inverters) as possible.

I think the M215 IG uses the same 144KHz communications frequency and
Zigbee protocol as most everyone else. The problem is that it uses
the same power lines that are conducting the switching noise for
communications. If your added ferrite beads clobber this signal, the
Envoy controller box is going to complain that it can't communicate
with the panels. So, be careful when you add a ferrite block as too
big a block, wrong material, too many beads, or too many turns, is
going to cause problems. I would aim for a 500 KHz low-pass corner
frequency.

As for grounding, the evolving NEC Article 690.35 for the US requires
that literally everything on the roof be well grounded. Since I
believe that the noise will be conducted rather than radiated,
additional grounding isn't going to do anything useful. In my never
humble opinion, filtering is your only option.

Good luck.

Light reading:
http://www.homepower.com/solar-electricity






--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

[Tom[_8_]]

Thank you for the information.

That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If
approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start
building it.

Thanks again for this info,

73s







"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 28 Jul 2015 07:05:54 -0400, "Tom" wrote:

Do you folks have any comments on these new Micro Inverters? Specically
the
Enphase M215. I understand there is a new one Enphase M215 IG I believe
that
addresses the interference experience by hams on VHF band. These are the
Micro Inverters two suppliers tole me to use that qualify for the Ontario
Microfit program. I reading reviews on Amazon that they are very
interfering. Is there a way of grounding them or a equal alternative model
that doesn't interfere with ham bands during peak sunlight hours? I need
to
put 50 of these on my roof under each panel. Any and all comments are
greatly appreciated as always. Thanks Gents,,,

I help maintain a few grid tied solar systems. Most use Enphase micro
inverters. The latest uses M215 IG inverters. Previous models were
totally floating and had no grounding points or fault protection. The
IG means "integrated ground" and also has a built in ground fault
protector. The grounding change probably has nothing to do with
EMI/RFI. There are also Chinese clones of these inverters, which
ended up at one of these systems thanks to a fly-by-night solar
contractor.

My guess(tm) is you're dealing with conducted EMI/RFI, not radiated.
Therefore, clamp on ferrite beads and blocks should work.
http://www.solar-electric.com/installation-parts-and-equipment/electrical-devices-transfer-switches-noise-filters/nosufefi.html
When I complained on behalf of one customer that the inverters were
trashing OTA TV reception, they installed the ferrite beads for free.
I don't think Enphase supplied the ferrites. It's mentioned in their
troubleshooting guide, but nowhere else:
http://www2.enphase.com/global/files/Enphase_Troubleshooting_Guide.pdf
See Pg 22. Note that the filters go as close to the source of the
noise (i.e. the M215 IG micro inverters) as possible.

I think the M215 IG uses the same 144KHz communications frequency and
Zigbee protocol as most everyone else. The problem is that it uses
the same power lines that are conducting the switching noise for
communications. If your added ferrite beads clobber this signal, the
Envoy controller box is going to complain that it can't communicate
with the panels. So, be careful when you add a ferrite block as too
big a block, wrong material, too many beads, or too many turns, is
going to cause problems. I would aim for a 500 KHz low-pass corner
frequency.

As for grounding, the evolving NEC Article 690.35 for the US requires
that literally everything on the roof be well grounded. Since I
believe that the noise will be conducted rather than radiated,
additional grounding isn't going to do anything useful. In my never
humble opinion, filtering is your only option.

Good luck.

Light reading:
http://www.homepower.com/solar-electricity






--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

[Jeff Liebermann[_2_]]

On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 07:15:26 -0400, "Tom" wrote:

That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If
approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start
building it.

One more potential problem. Enphase has an online monitoring system
at:
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public_systems
I suggest that you eventually sign up as a system owner. You can
download the data and create your own graphs such as:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/solar/380732/total-energy-21040613-20150213.jpg

Incidentally, you can query the Envoy controller directly either via a
web interface or using a graphing program (MRTG):
http://blog.tinle.org/?p=111
http://pvoutput.org
http://pvoutput.org/outputs.jsp
None of the system owners I deal with want me to do this, so I haven't
bothered to try it.

Now that I'm thinking about it, you might run into another problem.
The People's Republic of Santa Cruz (county) uses the NFPA NEC code
which now demands 2ft of clearance between the roof peak and the solar
panels. This clear area is for ventilating the roof should the house
catch fire. I have some issues with this requirement because it
significantly reduces the available roof area for panels for no
benefit because the other side of a typical hip roof is usually clear
of solar panels. You might want to check whether this is a
requirement in your area. I have some docs on the topic if becomes a
problem.

Good luck.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

[Tom[_8_]]

Thank you sir for your expertise again.

Very much appreciated.

73s





"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 07:15:26 -0400, "Tom" wrote:

That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If
approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start
building it.

One more potential problem. Enphase has an online monitoring system
at:
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public_systems
I suggest that you eventually sign up as a system owner. You can
download the data and create your own graphs such as:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/solar/380732/total-energy-21040613-20150213.jpg

Incidentally, you can query the Envoy controller directly either via a
web interface or using a graphing program (MRTG):
http://blog.tinle.org/?p=111
http://pvoutput.org
http://pvoutput.org/outputs.jsp
None of the system owners I deal with want me to do this, so I haven't
bothered to try it.

Now that I'm thinking about it, you might run into another problem.
The People's Republic of Santa Cruz (county) uses the NFPA NEC code
which now demands 2ft of clearance between the roof peak and the solar
panels. This clear area is for ventilating the roof should the house
catch fire. I have some issues with this requirement because it
significantly reduces the available roof area for panels for no
benefit because the other side of a typical hip roof is usually clear
of solar panels. You might want to check whether this is a
requirement in your area. I have some docs on the topic if becomes a
problem.

Good luck.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

[Tom[_8_]]

Hi Jeff

Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac volts
(grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power supplier
locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time that these
Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we are getting
more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These inverters
require being connected to the grid to function.

I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be
certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my case).

Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? That qualified for
the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems to me if
ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be stuck with
40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each.

Any comments are thankful,

Regards

Tom





"Tom" wrote in message
...
Thank you sir for your expertise again.

Very much appreciated.

73s





"Jeff Liebermann" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 2 Aug 2015 07:15:26 -0400, "Tom" wrote:

That is it in a nutshell. I am waiting for approval for the program, If
approved then I can go forward to begin purchasing the system and start
building it.

One more potential problem. Enphase has an online monitoring system
at:
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public_systems
I suggest that you eventually sign up as a system owner. You can
download the data and create your own graphs such as:
http://802.11junk.com/jeffl/solar/380732/total-energy-21040613-20150213.jpg

Incidentally, you can query the Envoy controller directly either via a
web interface or using a graphing program (MRTG):
http://blog.tinle.org/?p=111
http://pvoutput.org
http://pvoutput.org/outputs.jsp
None of the system owners I deal with want me to do this, so I haven't
bothered to try it.

Now that I'm thinking about it, you might run into another problem.
The People's Republic of Santa Cruz (county) uses the NFPA NEC code
which now demands 2ft of clearance between the roof peak and the solar
panels. This clear area is for ventilating the roof should the house
catch fire. I have some issues with this requirement because it
significantly reduces the available roof area for panels for no
benefit because the other side of a typical hip roof is usually clear
of solar panels. You might want to check whether this is a
requirement in your area. I have some docs on the topic if becomes a
problem.

Good luck.

--
Jeff Liebermann
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558

[Jerry Stuckle]

On 8/20/2015 3:14 PM, Tom wrote:
Hi Jeff

Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac
volts (grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power
supplier locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time
that these Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we
are getting more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These
inverters require being connected to the grid to function.

I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be
certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my
case).

Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? That qualified
for the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems
to me if ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be
stuck with 40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each.

Any comments are thankful,

Regards

Tom

Tom,

We don't do PV installations, but I have worked with a couple of
companies who do. Most of these installations will not run unless they
can synchronize with the 60hz line voltage - that is, when power fails,
the PV system doesn't run. I know there are some out there which will
run off of batteries, but not being familiar with the systems
themselves, I can't recommend any.

One other caution. At least here on the East Coast, you need a permit
to install a PV system. In many jurisdictions the wiring must be done
by a licensed electrician, although some will allow you to do it. In
most cases, if you are going to do it, you will need to take a test on
the National Electric Code before you are allowed to proceed.

And finally, the installation must be inspected by building authorities.
Failure to do so can cause all kinds of problems.

In short, a PV installation is not a DIY project. It's very complex,
with numerous building and electric codes involved. And a bad
installation can be a serious fire and electric shock hazard.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

[Tom[_8_]]

Thanks for commenting Jerry

Yes, all you say is the same here. All elements of the codes must be
followed.

So you are saying it is possible to be able to use your solar panels when
the grid is off?

At my cottage the grid shuts off for long times.

Thanks





"Jerry Stuckle" wrote in message
...
On 8/20/2015 3:14 PM, Tom wrote:
Hi Jeff

Can you comment on the fact that these Enphase converters need 240ac
volts (grid connection) to run? This means that if ever the power
supplier locally ever shuts down for more than a long period of time
that these Enphase units become useless. Around my neck of the woods we
are getting more and more power outages lasting longer and longer. These
inverters require being connected to the grid to function.

I understand the safety requirement and it needing to do this to be
certified but it really limits the home owner (or cottage owner in my
case).

Have you ever worked on a system that was more practical? That qualified
for the grid program but was useful when detached from the grid? Seems
to me if ever the power company decides to cancel the program you may be
stuck with 40 inverters that are useless and are 200 dollars each.

Any comments are thankful,

Regards

Tom

Tom,

We don't do PV installations, but I have worked with a couple of
companies who do. Most of these installations will not run unless they
can synchronize with the 60hz line voltage - that is, when power fails,
the PV system doesn't run. I know there are some out there which will
run off of batteries, but not being familiar with the systems
themselves, I can't recommend any.

One other caution. At least here on the East Coast, you need a permit
to install a PV system. In many jurisdictions the wiring must be done
by a licensed electrician, although some will allow you to do it. In
most cases, if you are going to do it, you will need to take a test on
the National Electric Code before you are allowed to proceed.

And finally, the installation must be inspected by building authorities.
Failure to do so can cause all kinds of problems.

In short, a PV installation is not a DIY project. It's very complex,
with numerous building and electric codes involved. And a bad
installation can be a serious fire and electric shock hazard.


--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry, AI0K

==================

[[email protected]]

Tom wrote:
Thanks for commenting Jerry

Yes, all you say is the same here. All elements of the codes must be
followed.

So you are saying it is possible to be able to use your solar panels when
the grid is off?

At my cottage the grid shuts off for long times.

Thanks

Yes, it is possible, but takes more equipment.

Most PV systems take the simple approach to the requirement that they
not feed into a grid that is off and potentially electrocute a
lineman by simply turning off your system.

More expensive systems include sensors and relays to isolate your
PV system and residence from the grid if the grid turns off.



--
Jim Pennino

[Tom[_8_]]

Yes, but Enphase Microinverters shut off, SolarEdge inverters shut off, for
just that reason. This makes them certifiable. They are probably the better
ones for my application.

You mentioned it was possible with more equipment. Can you elaborate? I want
to primarily be on the program, but when my grid goes down for any serious
length of time what more equipment would you recommend me considering that
both meets the code, made in Ontario and is tried and true, suitable for the
program. I don't want knock offs or copies, or offshore stuff. Must be
certified and meet the code, etc etc, and not so complicated it needs NASA
Satelite Engineers to approve my drawings.


Thanks





wrote in message
...
Tom wrote:
Thanks for commenting Jerry

Yes, all you say is the same here. All elements of the codes must be
followed.

So you are saying it is possible to be able to use your solar panels when
the grid is off?

At my cottage the grid shuts off for long times.

Thanks

Yes, it is possible, but takes more equipment.

Most PV systems take the simple approach to the requirement that they
not feed into a grid that is off and potentially electrocute a
lineman by simply turning off your system.

More expensive systems include sensors and relays to isolate your
PV system and residence from the grid if the grid turns off.



--
Jim Pennino