Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #21   Report Post  
Old November 11th 06, 01:46 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 750
Default What does a person think when they hear 'ham radio operator'?

Roger Wiseman AB8MQ, posing as "Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote:
Saggytits Stan Lawson Lee whined:


Woger's ho?


That would be you, bitch boy from Plano, Texas!


So back to not being Stagger Lee now? Stagger Lee isn't Lloyd or
Chason? You seem bewildered and confused, UnWiseman.

Dave K8MN
  #22   Report Post  
Old November 11th 06, 01:51 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,113
Default What does a person think when they hear 'ham radio operator'?

"Not Cocksucker Lloyd" wrote in
ups.com:


Lardass and 33 year old virgin Lloyd who can't pass 5 wpm code or the
General exam once whined:
On 9 Nov 2006 05:02:10 -0800, Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrong again,
fatty,.

imagine that! wrote:

Slow Code wrote:
Lloyd wrote in
:


GLENDALE, WV: The FCC requested July 11, 2000, that Roger L.
Wisema

n,
KC8JBO, retake the General examination elements under the
supervisi

on of
an ARRL-VEC volunteer examiner team. Wiseman must appear for
retest

ing
by September 11, 2000, or his license will be canceled.
Applicants appearing for re-examination are granted an Amateur
Radio license consistent with the elements passed. The FCC had
written Wiseman on March 29, 2000, advising that it had been made
aware of "an ongoing personal dispute" between Wiseman and
another licensee that included allegations of interference or
jamming on 20 meters. FCC Special Co

unsel
for Amateur Radio Enforcement Riley Hollingsworth invited the two
licensees to contact him to discuss the matter. Additionally, the
F

CC
had sent Wiseman a Warning Notice last November in response to
allegations of deliberate and malicious interference on 20
meters.


ROFL, I always laugh at that one.


...


The retest letter made no reference to interference; in fact gave no
reason for requiring the retest. Such a request is part of the
Volunteer Examining program. It could have been made for any number
of reasons that may have had nothing to do with any of the
addressee's actions. An investigation into the VE group that gave the
test, would be a good example.


ROFL, I always laugh at that reply, because he posts it so much.


Then you also laugh at your reflerction of your pig like face in the
mirror. Why can't you even pass the General test even once?



He might be like Mark in the Dark and is hoping to get one of those new
fangled welfare licenses the FCC is talking about.

SC
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Utillity freq List; NORMAN TRIANTAFILOS Shortwave 3 May 14th 05 03:31 AM
203 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (27-NOV-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 December 1st 04 06:09 AM
shortwv John Lauritsen Shortwave 0 November 28th 04 08:19 PM
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1402 ­ June 25, 2004 Radionews General 0 June 25th 04 07:29 PM
214 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (09-APR-04) Albert P. Belle Isle Shortwave 1 April 10th 04 06:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017