Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 05:53 PM
Louis C. LeVine
 
Posts: n/a
Default Why You Don't Like The ARRL

This came from another radio group. They are doing a survey to find
out why some people do not like the ARRL. I don't like it because it
costs to much. If it were $10 a year I might consider joining.
Louis

Subj: [REPEATER] Off List: ARRL
Date: 12/11/2003 5:43:47 AM Pacific Standard Time
From:
Reply-to:

To:

CC:


Hi all,

This is directed only to those who are NOT currently ARRL members. I

have
agreed to help compile a survey which seeks answers for these two

questions:

1: If you are not a member of the ARRL, why not?

2: If you were a member of the ARRL and quit, why?

Please respond by December 18th. * Please answer only OFF list to
in order keep the clutter on the remailer down.

Thank-you for assisting in this survey.

Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF


  #2   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 07:55 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Louis C. LeVine wrote:
This came from another radio group. They are doing a survey to find
out why some people do not like the ARRL. I don't like it because it
costs to much. If it were $10 a year I might consider joining.
Louis


I do like the ARRL. Do I agree with everything they do? Nope. I don't
agree with everything everyone does.

Expensive? A bit, but only for those that think they are just taking out
a magazine subscription.

Love their website, I've mined enough out of that to justify the
membership dues.

And the alternitive is?

- Mike KB3EIA -

  #3   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 08:01 PM
Grümwîtch thë Ünflãppåblê
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Coslo" wrote

:
: And the alternitive is?
:

DARC works good for us.

73/88 BGO
--
"All persons, living or dead, are purely coincidental, and should not be
construed."


  #4   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 08:13 PM
William Mutch
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , hamop_62
@hotmail.com says...
This came from another radio group. They are doing a survey to find
out why some people do not like the ARRL. I don't like it because it
costs to much. If it were $10 a year I might consider joining.
Louis


"snip"

Bill Pasternak, WA6ITF




I *am* a member of ARRL, but do find the membership a little
steep... I'd go $25,, but will think long and hard about renewing at
$40.

I think a lot of the long gray vanity call lists of DX and contest
results should be moved out of QST and onto some sub menu web page where
the three people who give a damn could look them up. QST is a pretty
good rag; it can still be improved.

I object to ARRL's position that we should not be discussing sex,
politics or religion on the bands...what else is left worth talking
about? BUT I wish ARRL or *someone* could act effectively to make
these discussions a bit more civil.

I don't think ARRL is doing enough of the "right stuff" to attract
newcomers, particularly youngsters, to the hobby. Often the emphasis is
too much on technolgy and equipment and not enough on the social
exploration that's possible with our radios.

On positive side I think ARRL is still doing a pretty decent job
representing our interests to the Beltway Bandits.


73 KC2LVQ
  #5   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 08:56 PM
Steveo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Coslo wrote:
And the alternitive is?


- Mike KB3EIA -

N8WWM's favorite.

http://www.rara.org/


  #6   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 10:50 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"William Mutch" wrote

I think a lot of the long gray vanity call lists of DX and contest
results should be moved out of QST and onto some sub menu web page where
the three people who give a damn could look them up.


You must have been distracted by a passing bimbo or something, but DXCC
listings were removed from QST several years ago and moved to the DXCC
Annual Report which goes only to DXCC participants.

The contest result listings similarly have been removed from QST and now can
be accessed on the web.


I object to ARRL's position that we should not be discussing sex,
politics or religion on the bands...what else is left worth talking
about? BUT I wish ARRL or *someone* could act effectively to make
these discussions a bit more civil.


ARRL makes no regulations whatsoever. You can talk about what ever you deem
proper, and only Riley Hollingsworth will challenge you if he thinks you're
over the line.

73, de Hans, K0HB




  #7   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 11:08 PM
Radioman
 
Posts: n/a
Default

And the alternitive is?

N8WWM's favorite:

http://www.rara.org/


Must be a part of the "Great Lakes Chapter" serving Michigan, Ohio and surrounding states,
with their grandmaster WA8PUD!!! LOL!!
  #8   Report Post  
Old December 11th 03, 11:14 PM
Steveo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Radioman wrote:
And the alternitive is?

N8WWM's favorite:

http://www.rara.org/


Must be a part of the "Great Lakes Chapter" serving Michigan, Ohio and
surrounding states, with their grandmaster WA8PUD!!! LOL!!

Hehe, charter member!?!

http://tinyurl.com/yu6l
  #9   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 12:51 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Sir, if you are so interested in having a magazine dedicated to the free
banding people why don't you start one. With 15 million, seems that you
would end up as a financial wizard.

The ARRL isn't going to print anything about free banding when they
operate on frequencies they are not permitted. "Licensing" is the name
of the game. "Legal" operation is the name of the game. Maybe you should
go back to printing a "CB" magazine, something like there was back in
the 60's-70's.

Jose wrote:

I don't lilke the ARRL, because QST does not print
any articles on Freebanding. Freebanding IS more popular
than ham radio, and we represent almost 15 million new
potential ARRL members. Too bad the ARRL Yankees
can't figure this out.

Jose

  #10   Report Post  
Old December 12th 03, 03:05 PM
Twistedhed
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jose wrote:
I don't lilke the ARRL, because QST does not print any articles on
Freebanding. =A0 Freebanding IS more popular than ham radio, and we
represent almost 15 million new potential ARRL members. =A0 Too bad the
ARRL Yankees can't figure this out.
Jose
_
Preferring to dress in drag as a woman, 209.195.185.229 at nauticom.net
pouted his lips, applied his ruby-red lipstick, shaved his legs and
called himself a she, and referred to himself as "Marylou" with:

Sir, if you are so interested in having a


magazine dedicated to the free banding


people why don't you start one.



Junior: That's NOT what he said. Read it again and try mouthing the
words outoud s-l-o-w-l-y.

With 15 million, seems that you would end up


as a financial wizard.




As you,,,,


The ARRL isn't going to print anything about


free banding when they operate on


frequencies they are not permitted.




It has been discussed in the past. When did this new rule you speak of
become adhered to by the ARRL?


"Licensing" is the name of the game.



The game is whatever we define it to be, despite your failure at
defining rules for others.


"Legal"


operation is the name of the game.



Umm,,no. Freebanding is not legal. Since your game is apparenty
diffferent than that of others, you would best yourself by not telling
others how to play theirs.

Maybe you should go back to printing a "CB"


magazine, something like there was back in


the 60's-70's.



Several subscription-only 'zines are available
featuring cb AND freebanding.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access Lloyd Mitchell Antenna 43 October 26th 04 01:37 AM
ARRL and the local scene KØHB Policy 3 May 17th 04 02:30 AM
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota Chuck Gysi N2DUP General 0 May 9th 04 09:18 PM
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! NIW Policy 0 March 23rd 04 11:29 PM
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) Twistedhed CB 0 August 20th 03 03:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017