[Brenda Ann]

For your perusal..

--
Say no to institutionalized interference.
Just say NO to HD/IBOC!

[William Sommerwerck[_2_]]

Radiorgan? Why don't they just say "tone controls"?

Fascinating. Thanks for posting it.

[Phil Nelson]

Radiorgan?

Zenith's marketers delighted in catchy made-up names. WaveMagnet, Split
Second Re-locator, Robot Dial, Tip-Touch Tuning, Goliath Chassis, etc.

Phil

[Bill Jeffrey]

Brenda Ann wrote:
For your perusal..

Thanks for posting these, Brenda.

Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but the scan of the title page
(Manual_1.jpg) looks different from the other seven. As it appears on my
screen, it is about 2/3 the width of the others, and only half the
height of the others. It appears that the lower half of the picture is
missing - everything below the 8G005 banner. The file size is also less
than half the size of the others.

Was it scanned or cropped differently? Am I having a download problem?

Thanks

Bill

[Bill Jeffrey]

Bill Jeffrey wrote:

Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but the scan of the title page
(Manual_1.jpg) looks different from the other seven. As it appears on my
screen, it is about 2/3 the width of the others, and only half the
height of the others.

Aha! I see the height difference - each of these scans is actually two
bound pages - except the first one. Of course, with the the booklet
closed, it is only one page. But I haven't figured out the width
difference yet.

Bill

[Brenda Ann]

"Bill Jeffrey" wrote in message
...
Bill Jeffrey wrote:

Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but the scan of the title page
(Manual_1.jpg) looks different from the other seven. As it appears on my
screen, it is about 2/3 the width of the others, and only half the
height of the others.

Aha! I see the height difference - each of these scans is actually two
bound pages - except the first one. Of course, with the the booklet
closed, it is only one page. But I haven't figured out the width
difference yet.

Bill

Try this one.. I've tried my best to rescan/resize and clean up the file.

[Bill Jeffrey]

Brenda Ann -

Thanks for the rescan. Much better this time, though I'm not exactly
sure why. According to my graphics program, both were scanned (or at
least saved) at 96 dpi, but the first one had considerably fewer pixels
- 640x102 vs 790x124 (almost exactly 6:5 ratio, FWIW).

In addition to the rescan, the cleanup along the bottom edge was welcome
- and the whole thing appears much sharper than the first version.

Thanks again

Bill Jeffrey
-----------------------------------

Brenda Ann wrote:
"Bill Jeffrey" wrote in message
...
Bill Jeffrey wrote:

Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but the scan of the title page
(Manual_1.jpg) looks different from the other seven. As it appears on my
screen, it is about 2/3 the width of the others, and only half the
height of the others.
Aha! I see the height difference - each of these scans is actually two
bound pages - except the first one. Of course, with the the booklet
closed, it is only one page. But I haven't figured out the width
difference yet.

Bill

Try this one.. I've tried my best to rescan/resize and clean up the file.

[Brenda Ann]

"Bill Jeffrey" wrote in message
...
Brenda Ann -

Thanks for the rescan. Much better this time, though I'm not exactly sure
why. According to my graphics program, both were scanned (or at least
saved) at 96 dpi, but the first one had considerably fewer pixels -
640x102 vs 790x124 (almost exactly 6:5 ratio, FWIW).

In addition to the rescan, the cleanup along the bottom edge was welcome -
and the whole thing appears much sharper than the first version.

Thanks again

Bill Jeffrey

I'm at somewhat of a loss as to how the original turned out as it did, too.
I went to the effort of doing a fairly high res scan and resizing it to
match the other scans this time. Just glad I could help.