Thread
:
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions
View Single Post
#
139
April 3rd 04, 08:28 PM
Len Over 21
Posts: n/a
In article ,
(Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes:
Subject: Wrong Yet Again, Len!
From:
(William)
Date: 4/2/2004 7:50 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
"William" wrote in message
om...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
"William" wrote in message
om...
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
...
Naturally. Farnsworth spaced code for slow word speeds is much
easier
to
copy than using slow letters.
Unnaturally. If the person prepared for Morse Code as stated in the
regulation, the Farnsworth Code will zip by. Failure is
predictable.
No current study materials omit explaining to the student that the
Farnsworth spacing will be used in the test. Anyone who ignores that
information has set themselves up for failure.
Dee D. Flint, N8UZE
The ARRL used Farnsworth for years before publishing a notice that
they were doing so.
Sorry but it was published.
Years later.
Brain, you have yet to answer my question as to WHAT FCC or federal law
mandated any "declaration" about using Farnsworth methodology for code test
preparation.
Brian did not bring this "declaration" up...that was another.
You are free to find your own sources of offical statements at the FCC
website using their own, publicly-available search facilities.
You DO have an answer, don't you?
You CAN do your own searches, but contentiousness is so much
easier to do, a sort of instant satsifaction of personal irritation.
I've read Part 97 a couple times and find nothing there that mandates it.
And I am also awaiting your answer as to WHAT "specification" exists for
"Morse Code".
97.3 (a) (27) - CCITT Recommendation F.1 (1984), Division B,
I. Morse code.
That is as stated in the 1 October 2003 printed form of Title 47 C.F.R.
available from the Government Printing Office. That same definition
existed in the October 2005 Code of Federal Regulations.
There are several adult education courses available in your area to
improve your personal reading comprehension skills.
More assertions without validation? Or is it OPINION, expressed just
because you like to see your name in print...?!?!
You have been repeatedly informed of the existing regulatory
specifications of and about International Morse Code. For years.
There is no point in you trying to argue the same subject with
constant obvious contentious behavior and trying to promote
verbal battles that irritate others.
It is much better to concentrate personal efforts on very real,
serious problems facing your remaining "service" days, such as
Access BPL and a possible future regulatory restructuring of
amateur radio.
LHA / WMD
Reply With Quote
