The
average person would assume the FCC merely assigned it. (Yes, believe
it
or
not I actually polled people to see their responses the last time this
bullsh*t came up). There is the root of the problem, if you have such a
****y feeling towards Kim's (and many other potentially offensive by
your
apparent standards) the why don't you spend your efforts whining to the
FCC
than wasting your time with posts that will not achieve ANY results
other
than to get it off your chest and to hear yourself "bellow" in a
"electronic
medium."


Know why he won't? He kept alluding to the fact that he was going to, or
kept inspiring others to do it. So, I wrote. I wrote knowing that Riley
would more than likely be the kind of person who probably doesn't
appreciate
the humor in my callsign, but also knowing that he upholds to the
principles
of a democracy. And, he did exactly that. He does not like my callsign.
But, he doesn't believe it is for the FCC to govern such things.

Well, I have said it before, and I will say it again, if the FCC is making
any specific callsigns available that are allegedly deemed "offensive" then
they are the ones that are responsible for that callsign. The efforts to
get those callsigns blocked/banned/removed etc. falls on them as long as
they are the governing body over amateur radio. It's just that simple.




--
Ryan, KC8PMX
FF1-FF2-MFR-(pending NREMT-B!)
--. --- -.. ... .- -. --. . .-.. ... .- .-. . ..-. .. .-. . ..-.
... --. .... - . .-. ...