"Larry Roll K3LT" wrote:

Well, if that's the case, then I guess my "due
respect" for your XYL is no longer deserved.


She'll do just fine without your concept of respect, Larry.


(snip) My intention is hardly to "dominate" Kim or
any other woman, Dwight. However, I'm curious as to
why that thought occurred to you! In reality, Kim's
call sign tends to encourage men to think of her in
that way, but, then again, that's undoubtedly her
intent. Not the kind of behavior I would expect
from a married woman and/or a mother, assuming she
has any children. (snip)


The thought occurred to me because you've spent the last several years
trying to sexualize Kim's callsign. I can remember back when I first ran
into this discussion. At the time, since I hadn't noticed her callsign
before, it took me several messages to figure out what you were talking
about. I ignored that discussion and didn't respond to the topic for several
more months (many dozens of messages later).


Dwight Stewart (W5NET)

http://www.qsl.net/w5net/