![]() |
Reflection on Resistive loads
Walter Maxwell wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2006 16:04:10 -0700, "Bob Agnew" wrote: Just a nit: You said: If there are reflections, the voltage and current are in phase only every 1/4 wavelength. Actually, if there are reflections, the voltage and current ar NEVER in phase. In fact, voltage and current in the reflected wave are ALWAYS 180° out of phase, while in the forward wave they are always in phase. Thus, along the line they alternately add and subtract, first reinforcing and then cancelling each other at every quarter wave, to form the standing wave. Walt, W2DU And, if you assume the line is lossless, the voltage and current are in phase every 90 degrees along the line regardless of the amount of mismatch. This is easily illustrated with a Smith chart -- choose any point you'd like, representing an arbitrary load impedance. Then draw a circle through that point, with the center of the circle at the chart's origin. Moving clockwise along this circle represents moving along the transmission line from the load toward the source. You'll cross the chart's axis, where the impedance is purely real, in a half revolution (90 degrees of movement along the line) or less, and cross it each half revolution (90 degrees) from then on. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Reflection on Resistive loads
Roy Lewallen wrote:
And, if you assume the line is lossless, the voltage and current are in phase every 90 degrees along the line regardless of the amount of mismatch. If the line has losses, the SWR circle becomes an SWR spiral but the spiral still crosses the purely resistive axis like the circle does, just not at the same points. Does your answer imply that the number of degrees between purely resistive crossings is not equal to 90 degrees when the line is lossy? (Not a trick question) -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reflection on Resistive loads
Cecil Moore wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: And, if you assume the line is lossless, the voltage and current are in phase every 90 degrees along the line regardless of the amount of mismatch. If the line has losses, the SWR circle becomes an SWR spiral but the spiral still crosses the purely resistive axis like the circle does, just not at the same points. Does your answer imply that the number of degrees between purely resistive crossings is not equal to 90 degrees when the line is lossy? (Not a trick question) After further thought, I think Roy's point is that a lossless transmission line has a purely resistive Z0 so the voltage and current are in phase every 90 degrees. Z0 is not purely resistive for ordinary transmission lines. But real-world distortionless lines are indeed lossy while possessing a purely resistive Z0. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reflection on Resistive loads
So how does a 1/2WL piece of transmission line driving a 50 ohm load wind up with the voltage and current in phase no matter what the SWR? -- If the characteristic impedance of the transmission line is 50 ohms, then there are no reflections; furthermore the current and voltage are in phase at every point along the line, There are no standing waves in this case. In fact it doesnt matter how long the line is as long as it is terminated in its charcteristic impedance. This case corresponds to the circle in the middle of the Smith Chart on which the impedance is constant. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message . com... Bob Agnew wrote: Just a nit: You said: If there are reflections, the voltage and current are in phase only every 1/4 wavelength. Actually, if there are reflections, the voltage and current ar NEVER in phase. c 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Reflection on Resistive loads
Bob Agnew wrote: So how does a 1/2WL piece of transmission line driving a 50 ohm load wind up with the voltage and current in phase no matter what the SWR? -- If the characteristic impedance of the transmission line is 50 ohms, then there are no reflections; furthermore the current and voltage are in phase at every point along the line, There are no standing waves in this case. In fact it doesnt matter how long the line is as long as it is terminated in its charcteristic impedance. This case corresponds to the circle in the middle of the Smith Chart on which the impedance is constant. It doesn't matter what the characteristic impedance of the transmission line is as long as it is an electrical 1/2WL. As such, you can have reflections, feeding a 50 ohm resistive load, and the voltage and current will be in phase 1/2WL back fron the load. Antenna matching with transmission line transformers use different impedance transmission lines to wind up with a perfect match. 73 Gary N4AST |
Reflection on Resistive loads
I haven't taught this subject at the University level for a few years now,
so my terminology is a little rusty. VSWR = (1 + abs(rho))/(1 - abs(rho)) When the reflection coefficient rho is +/- 1 the VSWR is infinite. When rho = 0 the VSWR is 1:1. A VSWR of 1:1 corresponds to the unit circle at the center of the Smith Chart. wrote in message oups.com... Bob Agnew wrote: So how does a 1/2WL piece of transmission line driving a 50 ohm load wind up with the voltage and current in phase no matter what the SWR? -- If the characteristic impedance of the transmission line is 50 ohms, then there are no reflections; furthermore the current and voltage are in phase at every point along the line, There are no standing waves in this case. In fact it doesnt matter how long the line is as long as it is terminated in its charcteristic impedance. This case corresponds to the circle in the middle of the Smith Chart on which the impedance is constant. It doesn't matter what the characteristic impedance of the transmission line is as long as it is an electrical 1/2WL. As such, you can have reflections, feeding a 50 ohm resistive load, and the voltage and current will be in phase 1/2WL back fron the load. Antenna matching with transmission line transformers use different impedance transmission lines to wind up with a perfect match. 73 Gary N4AST |
Reflection on Resistive loads
Bob Agnew wrote: I haven't taught this subject at the University level for a few years now, so my terminology is a little rusty. VSWR = (1 + abs(rho))/(1 - abs(rho)) When the reflection coefficient rho is +/- 1 the VSWR is infinite. When rho = 0 the VSWR is 1:1. A VSWR of 1:1 corresponds to the unit circle at the center of the Smith Chart. Hi Bob, I have never taught at the University level myself, this is an "Amateur" newsgroup. If you look at the Smith Chart, 1/2WL reflects back the identical load impedance, no matter the transmission line characteristic impedance (neglecting losses). If you have a 1/2WL 600 ohm line driving a 50 ohm load, then you have reflections (SWR), but at the source end, you see 50 ohms (V and I in phase). 73 Gary N4AST |
Reflection on Resistive loads
Hi Bob, I have never taught at the University level myself, this is an
"Amateur" newsgroup. If you look at the Smith Chart, 1/2WL reflects OK __ I won't post here anymore. I once was an Amateur when I was 14. I thought that I wanted to get back into the hobby now that I am retired. wrote in message ups.com... Bob Agnew wrote: I haven't taught this subject at the University level for a few years now, so my terminology is a little rusty. VSWR = (1 + abs(rho))/(1 - abs(rho)) When the reflection coefficient rho is +/- 1 the VSWR is infinite. When rho = 0 the VSWR is 1:1. A VSWR of 1:1 corresponds to the unit circle at the center of the Smith Chart. Hi Bob, I have never taught at the University level myself, this is an "Amateur" newsgroup. If you look at the Smith Chart, 1/2WL reflects back the identical load impedance, no matter the transmission line characteristic impedance (neglecting losses). If you have a 1/2WL 600 ohm line driving a 50 ohm load, then you have reflections (SWR), but at the source end, you see 50 ohms (V and I in phase). 73 Gary N4AST |
Reflection on Resistive loads
On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:30:21 -0700, "Bob Agnew"
wrote: Hi Bob, I have never taught at the University level myself, this is an "Amateur" newsgroup. If you look at the Smith Chart, 1/2WL reflects OK __ I won't post here anymore. I once was an Amateur when I was 14. I thought that I wanted to get back into the hobby now that I am retired. Hi Bob, You as a prof. are not alone here. We have several, some still in the saddle, others retired, and all Hams. You and Gary are not wrong either, simply posting at cross purposes when the topic was sidelined into half wave lines, SWR, and a demand for an explanation for a problem that was never offered in the first place. This was a troll that bit you, not Gary. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reflection on Resistive loads
"Richard Clark" wrote in message ... On Mon, 31 Jul 2006 16:30:21 -0700, "Bob Agnew" wrote: Hi Bob, I have never taught at the University level myself, this is an "Amateur" newsgroup. If you look at the Smith Chart, 1/2WL reflects OK __ I won't post here anymore. I once was an Amateur when I was 14. I thought that I wanted to get back into the hobby now that I am retired. Hi Bob, You as a prof. are not alone here. We have several, some still in the saddle, others retired, and all Hams. You and Gary are not wrong either, simply posting at cross purposes when the topic was sidelined into half wave lines, SWR, and a demand for an explanation for a problem that was never offered in the first place. This was a troll that bit you, not Gary. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC I have been an amateur continuously since I was 13: 1963. Transmission line: 1/2 half wave repeats the load, 1/4 wave inverts the load. That I knew in Jr High. Finally understood it when I studied E&M in college. 73 H. NQ5H www.hep.utexas.edu/mayamuon |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com