![]() |
|
Antenna wire
On Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:05:37 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:
There is no explicit discussion of wind loading, and the design guides (tables, nomographs, text) lead the reader to a design based on weight loading alone and with a Safety Factor of 10 or 5 depending on the chosen tension. Hi Owen, Consult: http://www.iaei.org/subscriber/magaz...other_code.htm 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Antenna wire
Richard Clark wrote:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006 02:18:21 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote: Apart from the challenge of making reliable connections to aluminium, are there other "issues" that come to mind in using such wire for antennas? Hi Owen, I've used ordinary house wiring for long-wires and they have survived 100# limb falls that ripped out my matching box from its post. The survival was with the wire, not the box. [warning to Reggie, the prose that follows contains literary allusions] What price tensile strength? The worst thing you can do is pull a wire tight in an attempt to totally eliminate sag. The inverse sine angle of its depression magnifies the stress by huge amounts. A slight sag will never yield a tensile failure in the most pedestrian of wire. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC As long as gravity exists will it ever be possible to get a perfectly horizontal dipole? In spite of a strong tensile component there will always be a vertical component due to gravity (with a centre feed there will also be the weight of any cable and perhaps a balun as well). The net effect is a sag called a catenary. Granted an infinite tension on the antenna wire would probably overcome the vertical component but the wire might not survive. The question for this relative neophyte is, what effect does the sag have on antenna performance? -- Paul S. Hinman - VE6LDS long West 113 deg 27 min 20 sec lat North 53 deg 27 min 3 sec Maidenhead Locator DO33gk |
Antenna wire
Paul Hinman wrote:
REDACTED As long as gravity exists will it ever be possible to get a perfectly horizontal dipole? NOPE!, At least not in wire. Theoretically, not in beams either. In spite of a strong tensile component there will always be a vertical component due to gravity (with a centre feed there will also be the weight of any cable and perhaps a balun as well). The net effect is a sag called a catenary. Granted an infinite tension on the antenna wire would probably overcome the vertical component but the wire might not survive. The question for this relative neophyte is, what effect does the sag have on antenna performance? Most likely less effect than nearby objects like houses, trees, earth, moon, sun, and rain. :-) "How many pins can be placed on the head of an angel?" makes more sense than hypothesizing about the effect of catenary on wire antennas. |
Antenna wire
Paul Hinman wrote:
The question for this relative neophyte is, what effect does the sag have on antenna performance? For average dipoles, the ham on the receiving end will probably not be able to tell any difference. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp |
Antenna wire
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:39:46 GMT, Paul Hinman
wrote: As long as gravity exists will it ever be possible to get a perfectly horizontal dipole? Hi Paul, If you read my further responses to Owen, you find the discussion of catenaries. In that regard, the answer to your question is unquestionably YES! You merely need to provide a catenary supporting the perfectly horizontal dipole. Regard any suspension bridge to discover the mechanics of construction. And, yes, the road bed is not horizontal, but an arc built to anticipate load; the ingenious antenna builder can reconcile this (trolley systems across the world with overhead suspended wires solve this easily). The question for this relative neophyte is, what effect does the sag have on antenna performance? Barring the suspension method, and the wire sags, it becomes a question of how much, and more importantly, in what relation to ground? If you have a 160M dipole with the ends up 10 meters, and a sag of only 0.1°, then you still have a dog. If it is a 10M dipole with a 10° sag, then you have a performer. This is a 100 fold variation that would seem to invert expectations - if were not for the wavelength and relation to ground. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Antenna wire
On Sat, 26 Aug 2006 09:39:46 GMT, Paul Hinman
wrote: wire might not survive. The question for this relative neophyte is, what effect does the sag have on antenna performance? Yes, perhaps you got on the wrong tram in the discussion about sag. It would be easy if you hadn't read the entire thread. Low sag is obtained by high wire tension. High wire tension under static conditions increases the risk of breaking under wind loading. Antennas that have broken don't perform so well. Owen PS: In answer to your question as to whether a dipole can ever be perfectly horizontal, perhaps no, perfect is probably not achievable by any real thing, but yes, it can be done to a close approximation, but it is probably not practical in most situations. Think of an electric railway with overhead power, the power conductor is very close to constant grade and parallel to the tracks, think of suspension bridges with an approximately flat roadway. There are of course other solutions as well. -- |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com