Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Felix,
I call Bull****. Show us REAL data on the efficiency of this antenna. Show us field strength vs. a full size 1/4 wave vertical with a good ground system. If you've invented something new and innovative, awesome, but the world will never know about it. Why? Because you won't do real tests. You want people to buy your plans. You make outrageous claims of efficiency with no data to back it up other than signal reports from closeby EU stations on 160m. As far as I'm concerned, at best, you're a optimist blinded by excitement who's built a pretty good low band mobile antenna and doesn't want to let himself down by measuring anything. At worst, you're an outright scammer. Actually, you know what, how much do you want for the plan again? Maybe we can take up a collection so we can build one and prove that you're wrong. But you know , I bet if we build it and it doesn't work as advertised, you'll make some claim about construction tolerances or sensitivity to nearby objects, or some such and still claim that YOUR antenna is 90% efficient. Such is the way of a good pseudoscientist. Dan |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna |