| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Felix wrote: Cecil Moore Wrote: Richard Fry wrote:- Felix Meyer, HB9ABX Felix Felix- your confusion is based on the fact that no one will believe you without a basis for a real comparison of your antenna with a reference antenna, done by another person, with publication of the results and a description of the method. NO qso "data" will do this. In that regard, you are just another pusher of an EH or CFA antenna. If you are serious, you will let some independent expert make one to your description, and test it properly. (That's what shot down the EH) In regard to the inability of such programs as EZNEC to properly evaluate your antenna, I have not seen a well described antenna that could not be evaluated honestly by a person aware of antenna theory and the modelling programs. Good luck-Bill |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
| Workman BS-1 Dipole Antenna = Easy Mod to make it a Mini-Windom Antenna ! | Shortwave | |||
| Imax ground plane question | CB | |||
| Questions -?- Considering a 'small' Shortwave Listener's (SWLs) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||