![]() |
|
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
Sounds like a good idea to me. SC |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
|
woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/mipsor/default.htm
Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: wrote: On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:43:28 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me. why? Even then you still couldn't pass it, Markie. sure I could serious SC if you can convince it would much difference I will support after the R&O ending code testing comes out Only because you can't pass the test now, you ill-educated loser. woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
For anything above a Tech. It will still make it easy for someone
to get into the hobby, and see if they wish to advance in class. If they wish to go up in class, they will pass the 85% test. -- SeeYaa:) Harbin Osteen KG6URO When American Citizens with dual citizenship pledges allegiance to the flag, to which flag do they pledge allegiance too? - "Slow Code" wrote in message nk.net... Sounds like a good idea to me. SC |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
Slow Code wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me. SC How about a USA version of the Canadian solution: 1) No change to license classes. 2) Tech requires Element 2 (Tech written) same as now. 3) General requires a Tech license plus Elements 1 and 3 (5 wpm code, General written). If Element 3 is passed with 85% or better correct, credit is given for Element 1. 4) Extra requires a General or Advanced plus Element 4 (Extra written). No new tests. No extra paperwork other than the VEs determining whether someone passed Element 3 with 74% or 85%. No reduction in requirements, just an alternate path. Why not? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
|
Markie lying kook on parade
an old freind to none a nightmare to underage kids wrote: Not Cocksucker Lloyd wrote: wrote: On Wed, 06 Sep 2006 23:43:28 GMT, Slow Code wrote: Sounds like a good idea to me. why? Even then you still couldn't pass it, Markie. sure I could serious SC if you can convince it would much difference I will support after the R&O ending code testing comes out Only because you can't pass the test now, you ill-educated loser. woger: lying kook on parade http://www.mipsor.state.mi.us/*mipsor/default.htm That faked website doesn't say if you passed the General test or not, Markie. You lying child raper. |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
N2EY wrote:
"Why not?" Morse code is electric smoke signals. Completely obsolete. The Amateur Radio Service is about wireless communications, not codes and cyphers. Telephone displaced telegraph on the wires. Radiotelephone replaced radio telegraph on the air, once modulation was developed. Telegraph is gone except for a few diehards. Good ridance! Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI, BSEE |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
Richard Harrison wrote:
: N2EY wrote: : "Why not?" : Morse code is electric smoke signals. Completely obsolete. The Amateur : Radio Service is about wireless communications, not codes and cyphers. : Telephone displaced telegraph on the wires. Radiotelephone replaced : radio telegraph on the air, once modulation was developed. Telegraph is : gone except for a few diehards. Good ridance! : Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI, BSEE You've never tried to *reliably* work Aurora on two metres or higher, have you? -- 73 Chris Cox N0UK, G4JEC, ex-AB0CN, ex-G8PTC RNARS #1157 EN34jv33 Don't Believe Everything You Think WWW Home Page: http://WWW.Chris.Org/ http://www.pingjockey.net Cultural observation: Europeans think 100 miles is a long way; Americans think 100 years is a long time! |
How about supporting an 85% passing score for written exams?
Cecil Moore wrote:
wrote: If Element 3 is passed with 85% or better correct, credit is given for Element 1. Why not? Because all the knowledge in the world cannot hold a candle to Morse code skill? :-) HAW! That's a good one, Cecil! Glad to see you've finally seen the light ;-) Seriously, though - the Canadian solution might be the way to consensus. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:37 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com