![]() |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
From: Jimmie D on Tues, Oct 17 2006 7:46 pm
wrote in message From: Nada Tapu on Sat, Sep 30 2006 2:23 pm On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:56:08 -0400, wrote: no slow code the number are down because with Code testing looks so stpupid The numbers are down for a variety of reasons, but I suspect that computers and the internet are the major factors, not the CW requirement. The ready-built Personal Computer first appeared in 1976, 30 years ago (the "IBM PC" debuted in 1980, 26 years ago). The Internet went public in 1991, 15 years ago. "Restructuring" to drop the morse test rate to 5 WPM for all such tests happened only 6 years ago. The peak licensing of 737,938 happened on 2 Jul 03, just 3 years ago. [they've been dropping at an average of 7K per year ever since] I disagree on your reasons stated in your quote above. When I ask technical people about why they haven't acquired an interest in amateur radio, I never get the CW requirement as a response. Strange, I hear that response. Having been IN radio- electronics for over a half century, I DO know some "technical people." :-) Manual radiotelegraphy was a MUST to use early radio as a communications medium. The technology of early radio was primitive, simple, and not yet developed. On-off keying was the ONLY practical way to make it possible to communicate. Morse code was then already mature and a new branch of communications was open to use by downsized landline telegraphers. They simply view the whole service as outmoded in the face of modern telecommunications. PART of that IS true. NOT all of it. What IS outmoded (technically) is sitting only on HF and "working" other stations with morse radiotelegraphy. Amateur radio is the ONLY radio service still using morse radiotelegraphy for communications purposes. Another thing outmoded is the strict "necessity" to use a formalism in "procedure" AS IF it was "professional" radio. That formalism was established between 50 to 70 years ago. Amateur radio, by definition, is NOT professional. Too many olde-tymers want to PRETEND they are pros in front of their ham rigs. But, there is still an enormous area of the EM spectrum that is still open for experimentation, for just the fun of doing something out of the ordinary above 30 MHz. That can be a very different RF environment, much much different than the technology available in the 20s and 30s. It has exciting possibilities...except for the rutted and mired olde-tymers unable to keep up with new things, secure in their own dreams of youth and simple technological environment. Let's face it.. the romance is gone. Oh, boo hoo...the "romance" of the 1930s is gone? Yes, it IS. The "pioneering of the airwaves" below 30 MHz has been DONE...mostly by the pros of radio (despite what the ARRL claims). DONE a long time ago. The solid-state era came into being about 45 years ago and has revolutionized ALL electronics (radio is a subset of that). Except as memorabilia trinkets of the past, GONE is the analog VFO, GONE is the one-tube regenerative receiver, GONE is the single-crystal-single-frequency Tx, GONE is the big, bulky AM modulator amplifier, GONE is the not- knowing-when-the-bands-are-open (solar activity and ionosonding solved that and HF MUF is a predictable item that can be found by a computer program). Except for the boatanchor afficionados, vacuum tubes are GONE for nearly everything but high-power transmitters. The radio world of today is NOT that of 1950, nor of 1960, nor 1970, nor even 1980s. It keeps changing, advancing, the state of the art never static. For the stuck-in-the-mud olde tymers that is terrible...they feel insecure on not being able to keep up, become aggressive to newcomers ("no kids, lids or space cadets") and retreat to the "secure" mode of their youth, "CW." But, they want to make sure They get the respect they feel they've "earned" (as if) so they try and try and try to bring all down to THEIR level...the code test MUST stay..."because." There are 100 million two-way radios in use in the USA alone, millions more in other countries. Those are the cellular telephones. There are millions of VHF and UHF transceivers in the USA, working daily for public safety agencies, ships, private boats, air carriers as well as private airplanes. There are tens of thousands of HF transceivers in use in the USA, users being everyone from government agencies to private boat owners, ALL exclusive of amateur radio users. Where is the "romance" in all this Plenty from a cornucopia that all have grabbed? It is GONE, yes. But, NEW "romances" await. DIFFERENT ones, I'd say a helluva lot more complex than old, simple "radio." We can't relive old "romances" except in our minds and we can't grow physically younger. Only person-to-person romance is TRUE, the other "romance" is of the imagination, of the fantasy of what was once there. This fantasy "romance" can't be brought back. It can't be legislated into remaining static. The rules and regulations have to change to keep up with the NOW. Total agreement here, our obligation of service to to earn our privlegdes doesnt end with what we have done but with what we have done lately. Sorry, but I see absolutely NO "obligation to perform some service [to the nation or community]." That is one of the myths promulgated by the ARRL and its followers. The word "service" used by the FCC all throughout Title 47 C.F.R., all Parts, is a regulatory term referring to a type and kind of radio activity being regulated. [see Citizens Band Radio SERVICE or Radio Control Radio SERVICE as two examples in Part 95] Also, as Cecil Moore mentioned, the government is doing its citizens a service, NOT the other way around. If an individual WANTS to VOLUNTARILY perform some service, then excellent. There is NO "obligation" to do so unless there is some law requiring it. Personally, I think all citizens of the USA should do at least one term of Jury Service. In California there is a state law that eligible citizens shall serve, for a time and times as stated by law. [I've done five terms of Jury Service here] Anyone who WANTS to voluntarily sit in on a court is allowed to (with some special conditions not permitting certain trials). Those spectators are NOT obligated to do so. USA amateur radio service is a VOLUNTARY activity. It is an avocation, not an occupation. In other words it is a HOBBY. It's a fine hobby, tens of thousands of citizens engaged in it. But, it is still a HOBBY. It is NOT "essential" for the good of the nation. It is high time that everyone quit dreaming about imaginary glory of "serving the community" through amateur radio...time to look at what it IS in the real world. |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of hamradio?
Jimmie D wrote:
His statement was "Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country" I dont remember the word government being mentioned in it. For professional politicians, the government and the country are indistinguishable. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
|
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
|
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of hamradio?
Not dropped here.
Even 9 year olds can learn the code. Barry OGrady wrote: Not since it was dropped completly 3 years ago. Barry ===== Home page http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of hamradio?
|
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
"Mark in the Dark" wrote in
: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:58:09 -0400, Dave wrote: Not dropped here. Even 9 year olds can learn the code. some can maening it is worhtless and unneeded for the rest Eliminating CW will let in more people like 'Mark in the Dark'. That won't be good for the rest of us if we enjoy having good intelligent QSO's. SC |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of hamradio?
Slow Code wrote:
It didnt keep you out |
Is the code requirement really keeping good people out of ham radio?
On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:28:34 -0400, Dave spake
thusly: wrote: On Sat, 21 Oct 2006 08:58:09 -0400, Dave wrote: Not dropped here. Even 9 year olds can learn the code. some can maening it is worhtless and unneeded for the rest Barry OGrady wrote: Not since it was dropped completly 3 years ago. "Worthless and Unneeded"? That was NOT the question!! Learn to answer the question! READ THE SUBJECT LINE. No one asked whether it is useful, it absolutely is, the question is: is it "keeping good people out of ham radio?" NOPE!!! Sorry, but I can say for an absolute fact that your 're wrong. It had kept me out of ham radio and I know exactly what kind of person that I am. And before the obligatory "lazy" word is trotted out, I have to work for the pay cheque that buys the radio, pays the rent for the building that the radio is in and pays for the tower that is in the back yard. I have to work extra to pay MORE for a place where I am allowed a tower, as opposed to less expensive digs. Honestly, I can't believe how some pro-coders look down on no-coders with such contempt. I was once a member of a "live steam" model railroad club. These were larger model steam trains that ran with real steam instead of electric power. They could be run with either propane or coal, depending on the individual. The guys who built their locomotives from scratch NEVER looked down on the guys who bought theirs from a classified ad. The guys burning coal did NOT call the propane guys "lazy". We all enjoyed a fine hobby and club meetings were always good fun and most informative. It was great for a mechanic, like myself, to rub shoulders with experienced retired machinists who built these locomotives. At one of our "open houses", which were located outdoors at the club track, my daughter took her first steps. Isn't ham radio supposed to be like that? Is there no camaraderie? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com