| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Sir:
Would not Mr. Hart's statements be considered "Hypothesis" not theory. Your explanation is very lucid for this electronics technician. Thank you! But, why is the arena of antenna theory still theory and not "fact" or "law" or whatever? A succinct explanation, if possible, would be appreciated. Regards Bill Cook N4WC Walter Maxwell wrote: Bill, KM4LS, forwarded my emial to him to Ted Hart, W5QJR. The following is Ted's response to me: Hi Walter, Bill sent me your note. Good to hear your view point on the EH Antenna. Sorry you have not moved your brain into this century. 100 Years ago man could not fly. If you read out web site you will find that our AM Broadcast antenna out performs a standard 1/4 wave AM Broadcast antenna. We also have commercial applications. Further, by direct comparison the EH Antenna outperforms wire antennas for Ham use. I have proven the EH Antenna. Best regards, Ted |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Passive Antenna Repeater Revisited | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||