| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004 00:01:54 GMT, "W3JDR" wrote:
because all of the power delivered to the antenna is radiated, any increase in radiated power due to some change in the configuration of the antenna is impossible. Therefore, this constitutes proof that your claim of gain with the EH configuration is invalid." I disagree. I think all you've asserted is conservation of energy, not whether or not the antenna has gain. Hi Joe, Walter has asserted that there is a constancy of power confirmed by total integration. Any increase in radiation with the same applied power is impossible by definition. One can observe a gain relative between two antennas and this would require significant differences in the two patterns. However, the data from the FCC methods of testing prove there is no difference. Except, of course, by that due to the nearby resonant structure which perturbs the EH field slightly (which, when wholly integrated reveals the familiar low efficiency of the EH relative to the nearby standard tower). 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
| Passive Antenna Repeater Revisited | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||