Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004 03:52:11 -0600, Mark Keith wrote:
Boy, he finally got something right...Yes, accurate tests results can tell a lot. *IF* we get ever get to see any. Hi Mark, His own data shows quite clearly that the eh antenna, 10 miles out, is more than 30dB down from the nearby standard quarterwave it is supposed to replace. His own data shows that at 1 mile out, the eh is still underperforming. There is a basic disconnect between what is claimed, and what the data clearly shows as a burnt resistor. More accuracy may improve the -30dB to -30.1dB but would hardly make things any better - or any worse. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Poor quality low + High TV channels? How much dB in Preamp? | Antenna | |||
Passive Antenna Repeater Revisited | Antenna | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna |