Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 25 Oct 2006 16:13:59 +0100, Ian White GM3SEK
wrote: that the ARRL was overly optimistic when they asserted that a coiled coax choke can cover all three octaves of HF. Agreed. Hi Ian, Really? 3 to 30 MHz is more than three octaves: 3 - 6 - 12 - 24 + 1/3 octave more Are we talking about Ham Bands? 160 - 80 - 40 - 20 - 10 Are we restricting from the top of the 80M band through 10M? 4 - 8 - 16 - 32 (actually 88% octave more) From 60M up? 60 - 30 - 15 + 75% octave more A subset of HF? such as 160 - 80 - 40 80 - 40 - 20 40 - 20 - 10 To anyone, Just where did the ARRL come up with this new band plan for HF? Hi Myron, Can you see any conclusion yet? Even with the new 3 Octave specification you still have to pick your application from 3 choices. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] | Shortwave | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
SkyWire Loop Antenna [Was: Wire loop.] Question | Shortwave |