RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   Identifying coax cable. (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/108338-identifying-coax-cable.html)

Boozo October 31st 06 03:05 AM

Identifying coax cable.
 
Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings
printed on it.
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?
Going by the size it looks similar to 50 ohm but I'm not sure.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.


K7ITM October 31st 06 06:52 AM

Identifying coax cable.
 

Boozo wrote:
Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings
printed on it.
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?
Going by the size it looks similar to 50 ohm but I'm not sure.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.


You didn't mention what you have to make measurements with. The
simplest way to make a quick estimate is probably to guess at the
velocity factor first: solid polyethylene is about 0.66, and foam
polyethylene is roughly 0.78. The impedance in ohms is 60*velocity
factor*ln(D/d), where ln is the natural logarithm, and D/d is the ratio
of inner to outer conductor diameters. So for solid polyethylene
dielectric, D/d is about 3.5 for 50 ohm line, and about 6.2 for 72-75
ohm line. Even for fairly small line, it's not difficult to tell by
just looking at it. It's also possible to measure the capacitance of
the lenth of line and the electrical length in nanoseconds, and
calculate the impedance from those two. If you can measure RF
impedance, measure the line with the far end open, and with it shorted,
and take the square root of the product of those two.

Cheers,
Tom


Wimpie October 31st 06 11:56 AM

Identifying coax cable.
 

Boozo ha escrito:

Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings
printed on it.
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?
Going by the size it looks similar to 50 ohm but I'm not sure.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.


About coax impedance,

When you just have a (VHF) transmitter with 50 Ohm VSWR meter and
external dummy load, you can do the following:

Check whether the insulation (between inner and outer conductor) is
solid or not (may be foam).
Check whether the insulation (between inner and outer conductor) melts
(changes color to transparent) at relative low temperature.

If solid, the velocity factor is about 0.66, when foam, it will be
about 0.79..0.84
If it melts at relative low temperature it is very likely Polyethyleen
(PE) insulation, if not, it is PTFE (Teflon).

Based on your transmission frequency and the velocity factor, cut an
electrically quarter wave. Terminate the cable with the 50 Ohms dummy
load and connect the cable to the VSWR meter. Measure the VSWR of the
cable/dummy load combination.

When VSWR is almost one, you can be sure it is 50 Ohms cable. When it
is about 2.2, it will be 75 Ohms cable. When it has VSWR close to 3.5,
it is probably 93 Ohms cable. This is based on: Zload*Zinput = Zcalbe^2
for a quarter wave line.

When these measurements matches the mechanical identification of Tom's
posting, you can be very sure about the impedance of the cable.

Best Regards,


Wim
PA3DJS


Rick October 31st 06 01:08 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?



Sure, attach it to a dummy load and see if you get a perfect 1:1 swr.
There are lots of other ways but this is simplest.



Cecil Moore October 31st 06 01:08 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 
Boozo wrote:
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?


If it is aluminum, it may be 75 ohm cable TV coax.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Tam/WB2TT October 31st 06 04:34 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

"Boozo" wrote in message
ups.com...
Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings
printed on it.
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?
Going by the size it looks similar to 50 ohm but I'm not sure.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.


If it has a solid center conductor, it is almost certainly 75 Ohm. The only
exception I can think of is some weird version of RG58.

Tam



K7ITM October 31st 06 05:55 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

Tam/WB2TT wrote:
"Boozo" wrote in message
ups.com...
Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings
printed on it.
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?
Going by the size it looks similar to 50 ohm but I'm not sure.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.


If it has a solid center conductor, it is almost certainly 75 Ohm. The only
exception I can think of is some weird version of RG58.

Tam


I do have a bunch of older RG-58 with solid center conductor, and
pretty much all the HP BNC patch cables I've seen the insides of have a
solid center. I believe the various semi-official versions (RG-58/U,
RG-58A/U, RG-58B/U and RG-58C/U) tell whether the center is supposed to
be solid or stranded, but that seems to have become *******ized. A
quick Google search for RG58A yields cables with both solid and
stranded centers. How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction
of that line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it
for something else, and I assume the poster would have mentioned the
strange construction. Also, you're likely to find a solid center in
higher impedance line like RG62/U, and you're likely to find stranded
center on 75 ohm line (like RG-11/U, and others). And of course for
some surplus custom line, all bets are off about both stranding and
impedance!

Cheers,
Tom


Harold E. Johnson October 31st 06 06:58 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

If it has a solid center conductor, it is almost certainly 75 Ohm. The
only
exception I can think of is some weird version of RG58.

Tam


I do have a bunch of older RG-58 with solid center conductor, and
pretty much all the HP BNC patch cables I've seen the insides of have a
solid center. I believe the various semi-official versions (RG-58/U,
RG-58A/U, RG-58B/U and RG-58C/U) tell whether the center is supposed to
be solid or stranded, but that seems to have become *******ized. A
quick Google search for RG58A yields cables with both solid and
stranded centers. How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction
of that line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it
for something else, and I assume the poster would have mentioned the
strange construction. Also, you're likely to find a solid center in
higher impedance line like RG62/U, and you're likely to find stranded
center on 75 ohm line (like RG-11/U, and others). And of course for
some surplus custom line, all bets are off about both stranding and
impedance!

Cheers,
Tom


Well, I was going to avoid this, but when you chimed in Tom, couldn't help
myself. In turn, I have a large helping of a Times Wire and Cable RG-8 size
50 Ohm coax with a solid inner conductor. Don't remember their nomenclature
for it but it's a real bear getting "N" connectors onto it..

W4ZCB



ml October 31st 06 11:31 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 
In article . com,
"Boozo" wrote:

Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings
printed on it.
Can anyone tell me how I can work out what it might be ? e.g. 75 ohm or
50 ohm or ?
Going by the size it looks similar to 50 ohm but I'm not sure.

Any suggestions would be appreciated.


just a note, lots of cable have sold conductors at 50ohms times
microwave and andrews cinta are examples

Jimmie D November 1st 06 02:57 AM

Identifying coax cable.
 

"Harold E. Johnson" wrote in message
news:A1N1h.261969$1i1.61365@attbi_s72...

If it has a solid center conductor, it is almost certainly 75 Ohm. The
only
exception I can think of is some weird version of RG58.

Tam


I do have a bunch of older RG-58 with solid center conductor, and
pretty much all the HP BNC patch cables I've seen the insides of have a
solid center. I believe the various semi-official versions (RG-58/U,
RG-58A/U, RG-58B/U and RG-58C/U) tell whether the center is supposed to
be solid or stranded, but that seems to have become *******ized. A
quick Google search for RG58A yields cables with both solid and
stranded centers. How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction
of that line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it
for something else, and I assume the poster would have mentioned the
strange construction. Also, you're likely to find a solid center in
higher impedance line like RG62/U, and you're likely to find stranded
center on 75 ohm line (like RG-11/U, and others). And of course for
some surplus custom line, all bets are off about both stranding and
impedance!

Cheers,
Tom


Well, I was going to avoid this, but when you chimed in Tom, couldn't help
myself. In turn, I have a large helping of a Times Wire and Cable RG-8
size 50 Ohm coax with a solid inner conductor. Don't remember their
nomenclature for it but it's a real bear getting "N" connectors onto it..

W4ZCB


Solid could be 92 ohms too.



[email protected] November 3rd 06 05:53 AM

Identifying coax cable.
 
Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no markings....
I do have a bunch of older RG-58 with solid center conductor, and


....[snip]....

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that line
is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for something
else, and I assume ....


For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
difference in the first place, could you please explain what I
should have recognized?

--Myron
--
--Myron A. Calhoun.
Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and cartridge
NRA Life Member and Rifle, Pistol, & Home Firearm Safety Certified Instructor
Certified Instructor for the Kansas Concealed-Carry Handgun license

Tam/WB2TT November 3rd 06 04:41 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

wrote in message ...
Have a 100 foot roll(approx) of used coax cable which has no
markings....

I do have a bunch of older RG-58 with solid center conductor, and


....[snip]....

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that line
is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for something
else, and I assume ....


For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
difference in the first place, could you please explain what I
should have recognized?

--Myron
--


The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.

Tam
--Myron A. Calhoun.
Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and
cartridge
NRA Life Member and Rifle, Pistol, & Home Firearm Safety Certified
Instructor
Certified Instructor for the Kansas Concealed-Carry Handgun license




[email protected] November 3rd 06 05:51 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 
.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that line
is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for something
else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?

--
--Myron A. Calhoun.
Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and cartridge
NRA Life Member and Rifle, Pistol, & Home Firearm Safety Certified Instructor
Certified Instructor for the Kansas Concealed-Carry Handgun license

Tam/WB2TT November 3rd 06 10:09 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

wrote in message ...
.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that line
is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for something
else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and
the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?

Sorry, I thought you were talking about the original question. The base 9913
is #10 solid. 9913 Flex is stranded.

Tam
--
--Myron A. Calhoun.
Five boxes preserve our freedoms: soap, ballot, witness, jury, and
cartridge
NRA Life Member and Rifle, Pistol, & Home Firearm Safety Certified
Instructor
Certified Instructor for the Kansas Concealed-Carry Handgun license




K7ITM November 3rd 06 10:52 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

wrote:
.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that line
is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for something
else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?


Actually, the difference I was writing about in the original posting
has to do not with whether the center conductor is solid or stranded,
but rather with the form the dielectric takes. It's a polyethylene
tube with fairly thin wall that supports the outer conductor, and
inside that, a "thread" of polyethylene with a diameter half the
difference between the inner conductor diameter and the ID of the
polyethylene tube, which is formed in a spiral to support the inner
conductor coaxially with the outer conductor. The result is that much
of the dielectric space is air (or water, if you install it
incorrectly...or get a lot of condensation in it). It's a very obvious
differentiator from the usual solid or foam dielectrics. It's also low
enough effective relative dielectric constant that the inner conductor
is particularly large, for 50 ohm line of that OD.

Cheers,
Tom


Allodoxaphobia November 3rd 06 11:04 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 
On 3 Nov 2006 14:52:12 -0800, K7ITM wrote:
.......
but rather with the form the dielectric takes. It's a polyethylene
tube with fairly thin wall that supports the outer conductor, and
inside that, a "thread" of polyethylene with a diameter half the
difference between the inner conductor diameter and the ID of the
polyethylene tube, which is formed in a spiral to support the inner
conductor coaxially with the outer conductor.


That sounds like RG-62 (93 ohm).
Video terminal cable -- 3270 and that ilk.

But, since none of the mind readers in this ng have yet to post the
dimensions, it's only a data point so far.

Jonesy
--
Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux
38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2
*** Killfiling google posts: http//jonz.net/ng.htm


Slow Code November 4th 06 12:16 AM

Identifying coax cable.
 
wrote in :

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that
line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for
something else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and
the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?




Just go to Radio Shack. You can exchange blank stares with the clerk.

SC

Boozo November 4th 06 11:36 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in :

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that
line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for
something else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and
the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?


Just go to Radio Shack. You can exchange blank stares with the clerk.

SC

Looks like I may have to as it doesn't seem to have an easy solution and
my VHF transmitter is broken.
Have a data sheet handy so might take some measurements with the vernier
calipers and see what I come up with.

Thanks for all the suggestions.

Boozo.(nothing to do with alcohol !)



an_old_friend November 5th 06 02:06 AM

sc continues crapathon
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in :

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that
line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for
something else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and
the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?




Just go to Radio Shack. You can exchange blank stares with the clerk.

why do you keep trolling this crap into policy?

SC



Dave November 5th 06 12:58 PM

Identifying coax cable.
 

"Boozo" wrote in message
...

"Slow Code" wrote in message
nk.net...
wrote in :

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that
line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for
something else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and
the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.

I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?


Just go to Radio Shack. You can exchange blank stares with the clerk.

SC

Looks like I may have to as it doesn't seem to have an easy solution and
my VHF transmitter is broken.
Have a data sheet handy so might take some measurements with the vernier
calipers and see what I come up with.

Thanks for all the suggestions.

Boozo.(nothing to do with alcohol !)


the original 9913 has a 9.5ga solid copper center conductor, the center
conductor has a spiral wrapped standoff insulator, a thin solid dielectric
layer then foil and braid shield. the od is .405" so it can't be easily
distinguished from regular rg8 without looking inside. though if it is the
original good stuff i would expect it to be well marked on the outside since
not just everyone made it. the problem is that there have been many
variations over the years on 9913, including stranded center conductors and
some variations in dielectrics.



K4YZ November 6th 06 08:03 AM

"Slow Code"...I Owe You A Cold One! Thanks!
 

Slow Code wrote:
wrote in :

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that
line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it for
something else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,... and
the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or solid.


I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?


Just go to Radio Shack. You can exchange blank stares with the clerk.


BBBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

R O T M F F L M M F A O ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I haven't laughed that hard in a while!

Thanks!

Steve, K4YZ


Slow Code November 7th 06 12:58 AM

"Slow Code"...I Owe You A Cold One! Thanks!
 
Mark in the Dark, wrote in
:

On 6 Nov 2006 00:03:19 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


Slow Code wrote:
wrote in :

.... How about Belden 9913? Of course, the construction of that
line is "different" enough that it would be hard to mistake it
for something else, and I assume ....

For those of us who never noticed -- or never recognized -- the
9913 differences in the first place, could you please explain....

The outside diameter of the cable, like .195, .240, .260, .405,...
and the
gage of the center conductor, like #10, 14, 16, 18, stranded or
solid.

I don't understand. Are you saying 9913 has been made in ALL
of those different sizes and with ALL of those different center-
conductor gauges?

Just go to Radio Shack. You can exchange blank stares with the clerk.


BBBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHA
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

R O T M F F L M M F A O ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I haven't laughed that hard in a while!


yes we know you like degrading everyione arround you



Shut up Markie. You can't even spell 'coax.'

SC



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com