Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Walter Maxwell" wrote in message ... On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:55:14 +0100, SamSvL wrote: "Jerry Martes" wrote in news:nPEah.15278$Uz.1717@trnddc05: "SamSvL" wrote in message ... Walter Maxwell wrote in : On Thu, 23 Nov 2006 19:04:22 GMT, "Jerry Martes" wrote: "SamSvL" wrote in message . 15... What would be a good (free space, 1 GHz) antenna to achieve circular polarizarion with a nearly spherical coverage? Thanks, Sam Hi Sam If you want "half spherical" coverage for receiving a circularly polarized signal, a turnstile is probably the easiest to build. If your requirements for sensitivity are more stringent than the turnstile provides, a quadrafilar helix is excellant circular polarization. Jerry Hi Sam, FYI, the quadrifilar helix comprises two bifilar helices fed in phase quadrature. The result is hemispherical radiation in the radiation sphere. But the hemispherical radiation results from the combined radiations from each bifilar helix. Consequently, radiation from a single bifilar helix is spherical, with the polizarization sense the same throughout the sphere, unlike the radiation from a turnstile, which radiates one polarization sense above the equator and the opposite sense below the equator, where the turnstile elements lie on the equator. You can find info on the bifilar helix in Chapter 22 of Reflections, eds 1 and 2. If you don't have a copy of Reflections available, Chapter 22 is available for downloading from my web page at www.w2du.com. Click on "Read Chapters from Reflections 2" and then click on 'Chapter 22, Quadrifilar Antenna'. Fig 22-5 shows the radiation pattern for the quadrifilar, but the radiation in the 180° direction is suppressed due to the effect of the second helix positioned 90° from the first helix, and fed in quadrature (90°) relative to the first. In the absence of the second helix the radiation from a single bifilar is spherical. Fig 22-8 shows a simple method of feeding the bifilar helix--it's called an 'infinite balun', because the current that would flow on the outside surface of the coax when feeding a doublet dipole without a balun is now flowing on the outside surface of the radiator, which is what we want. If you're interested in further info on the helices used in quadrifilars or bifilars, see the report on my R&D experiment on quadrifilars, in which I measured radiation patterns and driving point impedances on more than a thousand different configurations of the quadrifilar. The R&D report is available for downloading on my web page. Click first on "Read Appendices from Reflections 2", and then click on 'Appendix 13, RCA R&D Quadrifilar Helix Antenna'. Hope this helps, Walt Maxwell, W2DU Hi Walt, Thanks for your reaction. And yes, I found your articles already some time ago. I missed the notes on the bifilar, but will study them again carefully. Again, thanks, Sam Hi Sam I dont want to discourage your study of them, but, bifilar has significant nulls for CP. Jerry Jerry Hi Jerry, The radiation pattern is doughnut shaped. You're right ! sam Hi Sam & Jerry, I stand corrected, and thanks to both of you for detecting my error. As I told Sam, it's been 26 years since I worked on the QHA, and I simply forgot that the second bifilar fills in the null of the first, due to their quadrature relationship. Senior moments are arriving more frequently these days at age 88. Walt Hi Walt I dont consider your statement to be an error. I suspect the bifilar helix is the closest antenna configuration Sam could find. A casual forum like this group has to be able to cut some slack. You made sense to me. Jerry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"All Waves" Spherical {Metal Ball} Antenna an all around Isotropic Radiator :o) | Shortwave |