Tom if you want to align yourself who say they don't understand that is
fine with me.

Do you have anything to say about radiation efficiency of a yagi which
is what the posting is about you mentioned something about 95 efficient
which you got from some where you could describe why and how 5% of the
input anergy is lost or were you just guessing?
Start a new thread if you like and I will go to bed as I am going
nowhere with this and I am not anxious to stay when profanitys break
out and it is heading that way

art wrote:
Not a reasonable answer, could be speculation like some of the comments
I get from experts. The yagi is not totally efficient in changing the
time changing field to a radiative field
because it has detuned elements contrary to what Roy states that a
reflector aids the forward lobe.......that is trash talk but many of
the so called experts are following like lemmons


Tom Ring wrote:
art wrote:

Tom Ring wrote:

art wrote:
snip

There again maybe it is best that you be honest and say
you don't understand! Better that than join those who have
nothing to say about antennas!


Actually Art, you are already the master of misunderstanding.

tom
K0TAR

See Tom you had nothing of value to say about antennas or the question
at hand
I think you would be better conversing with members of this group who
are intent on disruption and stop questions on antennas. What goes
around comes around so I will not answer in kind. If you want to stick
with the idea that a yagi is the next thing to sliced bread then be my
guest Better still study up on the code so you can join friends.


And to continue the theme -

Actually Art, yagis are usually better than 95% efficient.

tom
K0TAR