Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4 Dec 2006 06:07:44 -0800, "Denny" wrote:
.... So I purchased an Infrared measurement gun... fascinating little instrument - did you know that on a clear day with the air temperature +12.1 F and zero wind, that a 5 foot diameter black rubber tractor tire facing the clear sky to the North can have a surface temp of -2.6 to -3.0 F? I didn't but that is what I found... OK, I digress again It is not such a digression. You should do make measurements of the temperature of different materials that you know are at the same temperature, and see what results you get from your non-contact thermometer. The emissivity of the surface is an important factor that limits the absolute accuracy of these things. It is an interesting experiment that you have described, though I am not sure that surface temperature (if it is accurate) alone is a good indicator of the power flow to the air. For example, would you expect that the temperatures of natural coloured and black aluminium heatsink to be the same if dissipating the same (non zero) power in the same environment? Extending that to your experiment, is dark enamelled copper wire (as may be used in a coil) a better black body radiator than bright aluminium (as may be used in a capacitor). Owen -- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Owen Duffy wrote:
On 4 Dec 2006 06:07:44 -0800, "Denny" wrote: ... So I purchased an Infrared measurement gun... fascinating little instrument - did you know that on a clear day with the air temperature +12.1 F and zero wind, that a 5 foot diameter black rubber tractor tire facing the clear sky to the North can have a surface temp of -2.6 to -3.0 F? I didn't but that is what I found... OK, I digress again It is not such a digression. You should do make measurements of the temperature of different materials that you know are at the same temperature, and see what results you get from your non-contact thermometer. The emissivity of the surface is an important factor that limits the absolute accuracy of these things. It is an interesting experiment that you have described, though I am not sure that surface temperature (if it is accurate) alone is a good indicator of the power flow to the air. For example, would you expect that the temperatures of natural coloured and black aluminium heatsink to be the same if dissipating the same (non zero) power in the same environment? Extending that to your experiment, is dark enamelled copper wire (as may be used in a coil) a better black body radiator than bright aluminium (as may be used in a capacitor). Owen -- And of course, the magnitude of the surface area over which the power is being dissipated will also influence the temperature rise of the small area being measured by the instrument. Measured temperature differences of the same material and at the same distance (under different experimental conditions) are likely to be more accurate than absolute measurements with unknown emissivity. Chuck ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Owen Duffy wrote: On 4 Dec 2006 06:07:44 -0800, "Denny" wrote: ... So I purchased an Infrared measurement gun... fascinating little instrument - did you know that on a clear day with the air temperature +12.1 F and zero wind, that a 5 foot diameter black rubber tractor tire facing the clear sky to the North can have a surface temp of -2.6 to -3.0 F? I didn't but that is what I found... OK, I digress again It is not such a digression. You should do make measurements of the temperature of different materials that you know are at the same temperature, and see what results you get from your non-contact thermometer. The emissivity of the surface is an important factor that limits the absolute accuracy of these things. It is an interesting experiment that you have described, though I am not sure that surface temperature (if it is accurate) alone is a good indicator of the power flow to the air. For example, would you expect that the temperatures of natural coloured and black aluminium heatsink to be the same if dissipating the same (non zero) power in the same environment? Extending that to your experiment, is dark enamelled copper wire (as may be used in a coil) a better black body radiator than bright aluminium (as may be used in a capacitor). Owen -- Actually, unless the heat sink gets pretty hot relative to its surroundings, a large percentage of the heat loss is convective, not radiative, assuming we're operating in air at normal atmospheric pressures. It all gets much more interesting in a good vacuum. If I got the numbers right, for example, blackbody radiation at 280K is about 35 milliwatts/cm^2, and at 300K it's about 46 milliwatts/cm^2. So 20C above roughly room temperature ambient gets you a whopping net 11 milliwatts/cm^2 to radiation. (Fins facing each other don't help radiation, but do help convection.) Cheers, Tom |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Owen Duffy wrote: On 4 Dec 2006 06:07:44 -0800, "Denny" wrote: ... So I purchased an Infrared measurement gun... fascinating little instrument - did you know that on a clear day with the air temperature +12.1 F and zero wind, that a 5 foot diameter black rubber tractor tire facing the clear sky to the North can have a surface temp of -2.6 to -3.0 F? I didn't but that is what I found... OK, I digress again It is not such a digression. You should do make measurements of the temperature of different materials that you know are at the same temperature, and see what results you get from your non-contact thermometer. The emissivity of the surface is an important factor that limits the absolute accuracy of these things. It is an interesting experiment that you have described, though I am not sure that surface temperature (if it is accurate) alone is a good indicator of the power flow to the air. For example, would you expect that the temperatures of natural coloured and black aluminium heatsink to be the same if dissipating the same (non zero) power in the same environment? Extending that to your experiment, is dark enamelled copper wire (as may be used in a coil) a better black body radiator than bright aluminium (as may be used in a capacitor). Owen -- (I apologize for not thinking of this in time to include it in my previous posting...) Remember, too, that what looks "black" to us in the visible spectrum may be quite different over the spectrum including most of the radiation, especially when the object is only about 250K to 350K. At 300K, the peak of black body radiation occurs at about 10 microns, less than 1/10000th the frequency of visible light. I suppose heat sinks are dyed black more because we think they should look black than because it does any good thermally. And avoid buying heat sinks that are PAINTED black; the paint just adds to the thermal resistance. Cheers, Tom |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K7ITM wrote: Owen Duffy wrote: On 4 Dec 2006 06:07:44 -0800, "Denny" wrote: ... So I purchased an Infrared measurement gun... fascinating little instrument - did you know that on a clear day with the air temperature +12.1 F and zero wind, that a 5 foot diameter black rubber tractor tire facing the clear sky to the North can have a surface temp of -2.6 to -3.0 F? I didn't but that is what I found... OK, I digress again It is not such a digression. You should do make measurements of the temperature of different materials that you know are at the same temperature, and see what results you get from your non-contact thermometer. The emissivity of the surface is an important factor that limits the absolute accuracy of these things. It is an interesting experiment that you have described, though I am not sure that surface temperature (if it is accurate) alone is a good indicator of the power flow to the air. For example, would you expect that the temperatures of natural coloured and black aluminium heatsink to be the same if dissipating the same (non zero) power in the same environment? Extending that to your experiment, is dark enamelled copper wire (as may be used in a coil) a better black body radiator than bright aluminium (as may be used in a capacitor). Owen -- (I apologize for not thinking of this in time to include it in my previous posting...) Remember, too, that what looks "black" to us in the visible spectrum may be quite different over the spectrum including most of the radiation, especially when the object is only about 250K to 350K. At 300K, the peak of black body radiation occurs at about 10 microns, less than 1/10000th the frequency of visible light. I suppose heat sinks are dyed black more because we think they should look black than because it does any good thermally. And avoid buying heat sinks that are PAINTED black; the paint just adds to the thermal resistance. Cheers, Tom Shoot, make that "less than 1/10th the frequency of visible light," but still darned little radiated in the visible region. There's cool 'speriment using a spherical flask of visibly opaque liquid to focus IR radiation to a point where you can feel it very easily. What you see in the visible spectrum isn't what IR "sees." Cheers, Tom |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Coax Losses ? | Antenna | |||
Determining SWR and Transmission Line Losses | Antenna | |||
Additional Line Losses Due to SWR | Antenna | |||
Losses in PI-filter output | Antenna |