Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
art wrote:
[snip] this aproach works out using a antenna program that is related but not the same as standard formd i.e. AO professional. A separate individual took my figures and applied them to the NEC4 program which is more universally accepted and where it validated my findings. [snip] Hi Art, I don't want to get into the details of your new antenna concept. However, consider this. Your antenna, whatever it is, seems to be modeled correctly by both AO Pro and by NEC4. Both of those programs are based on completely conventional electromagnetic theory that has been in use for over a century. In that case it is most unlikely that you have discovered any new electromagnetic science. It is quite possible that your antenna configuration is novel, and it is even possible that your method of informally describing the antenna is new and useful. However, new science it ain't. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Optimising a G5RV | Antenna | |||
Shortwave Listener (SWL) Newbee Question - Is My Dipole Antenna Set-Up Right ? | Shortwave | |||
Question is 'it' a Longwire {Random Wire} Antenna -or- Inverted "L" Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
The "Almost" Delta Loop Antenna for Limited Space Shortwave Listening (SWL) made from TV 'type' Parts | Shortwave | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna |