Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I opened the meter of an Hallicrafters SX-117 to mechanically adjust the zero.
Once open, the meter appeared to be of the moving iron type, that is with no moving coil. But I was surprised to see that that meter has no spiral torsion springs either; I can only see a metal (?) dish mounted on the axis, part of which lies inside a rather flat coil. With no spring, I cannot understand what forces the needle to stay at zero scale in absence of current. Therefore I cannot figure out what I should do to adjust the zero. The HT-44 as well as the EICO 723 use the same type of meter. Dumping is poor, and the needle keeps banging for a while when you apply a DC current. 73 Tony I0JX |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry for the OT. I made a mistake, and posted the mesage on the wrong
newsgroup. Tony I0JX |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 21:11:44 +0100, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote: I opened the meter of an Hallicrafters SX-117 to mechanically adjust the zero. Once open, the meter appeared to be of the moving iron type, that is with no moving coil. But I was surprised to see that that meter has no spiral torsion springs either; I can only see a metal (?) dish mounted on the axis, part of which lies inside a rather flat coil. Hi Tony, Consult paragraph 5-5: http://www.rigpix.com/hallicrafter/sx117_manual.pdf 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Consult paragraph 5-5:
http://www.rigpix.com/hallicrafter/sx117_manual.pdf 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Dick, you read my question too quckly. I was not referring to the electrical adjustment (there is a potentiometer just for that) but to the mechanical adjustment. In a properly maintained radio, the meter should stay at zero even when the radio is off. That is the reason for the mechanical adustment. 73 Tony I0JX |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006 22:19:15 +0100, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote: you read my question too quckly. I was not referring to the electrical adjustment (there is a potentiometer just for that) but to the mechanical adjustment. Hi Tony, From paragraph 5-5 "The Meter Zero control may be found directly under the rear of the meter housing." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi Tony, From paragraph 5-5 "The Meter Zero control may be found directly under the rear of the meter housing." 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Again Dick, I have adjusted that control many times and any SX-117 owner knows that that contriol exists. I am instead trying to adjust the mechanical zero which has nothing to do with the control under the rear of the meter housing. Do you appreciate the difference? Tony I0JX |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 9 Dec 2006 10:49:08 +0100, "Antonio Vernucci"
wrote: Do you appreciate the difference? Hi Tony, Nope. The meter is always in a condition where current is flowing given that it shares the cathode load. Paragraph 5-5 says quite clearly how to set zero for a zero signal condition. Basically, the design reveals an admission that there is no "zero" in the first place (merely a minimum). Aside from that, there is no need to be concerned about a meter reading for a receiver that is turned off. In short, any attempt to force a mechanical zero would be negated by the "electrical zero" set and S-9 calibration. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
Electromagnetic Radiation | Policy | |||
SWR meter kaput? | Antenna | |||
Smith Chart Quiz | Antenna |