Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Jim Kelley wrote: I simply meant that a folded dipole is just as likely to produce precipitation static noise as a dipole antenna. ... so I'll give you that one even though I never claimed it would. Happier now? Sorry, I thought you were claiming equal magnitudes of noise for two dissimilar antennas. You seem like a guy who'd pick a fight with his own shadow sometimes, Sorry, I seem to have inferred something you didn't mean to imply. I believe I can prove the difference in the two antennas using EZNEC but not until I get back to my home computer. -- 73, Cecil, w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
T2FD antenna opinions solicited | Shortwave | |||
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna | Shortwave | |||
Top-loaded folded monopole? | Antenna | |||
String up folded dipoles for FM? | Antenna |