LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old December 23rd 06, 03:02 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2006
Posts: 48
Default folded dipoles

Tom Donaly wrote:


Hi Chuck,
Read "Meteorological Aspects of Precipitation Static" By
Lieutenant Robert C, Edwards, U.S.N.R., and Captain George W. Brock,
U.S.A.A.F. from the Journal of Meteorology, Vol. 1, Number 4,
December, 1945. If you Google "Precipitation Static" you can
find a pdf file of it. They actually went up in three different
airplanes, an RB-37, a B-25D, and a B-17G and did some measurements.
You might be interested in their methods and conclusions.
73,
Tom Donaly, KA6RUH


Hi Tom,

Thanks for the reference. Quite an interesting article.

My one problem with it after a quick reading is their
autogenous/exogenous electrification dichotomy. More particularly, their
notion of exogenous electrification, which " . . . occurs when an
aircraft flies through electric fields previously established by a
charge separation in the free atmosphere."

Not sure it is important to the physics exactly how the electric field
was established, but taking the airplane to be an isolated conductor in
an electric field, I wonder how "electrification" can take place.

Perhaps 60 years ago we used different terminology, but electrification
usually refers to contact charge separation. Since there is no assumed
contact with charged particles in the exogenous electrification mode,
electrification may be a misnomer today. As I suggested in an earlier
post, all an electric field can do to an isolated conductor is
redistribute the charges preexisting on the conductor. Of course if the
redistribution of charges leads to coronal discharges favoring either
the positive or negative "end" of the plane, then the plane could
acquire a non-zero net charge (i.e., be electrified). The authors don't
give a hint that this is what was envisioned, though.

I'd appreciate comments on whether such a thing as "exogenous
electrification" as described by the authors makes sense to anyone else.

73.

Chuck
NT3G


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna RHF Shortwave 2 April 18th 06 10:21 PM
T2FD antenna opinions solicited N9NEO Shortwave 11 March 18th 06 08:39 AM
ABOUT - The "T" & Windom Antenna plus Twin Lead Folded Dipole Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 November 4th 05 06:13 PM
Top-loaded folded monopole? Brian Antenna 1 June 30th 05 04:38 AM
String up folded dipoles for FM? googlegroups.ken Antenna 0 January 13th 05 03:36 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017