| Page 2 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Gaussian law and time varying fields
David
Calm down, the die has been cast and people know that you had the chance but not the education to take part in it. This newsgroup is for debate and you were the one to take up the axe but when put to the test failed to show up. I think people will wonder why you ran away after all that talking, and you keep coming back at me for some reason. You must admit that others who are reading this are wondering why you deiced not to put me into the middle ages, there wasn't any conditions imposed not one and you talked about all the experience you have with different programs anbd because I didn't pose any conditions fell back on the notion or position that the programs are no good unless you know what you are doing. Yet you try to tell me you are knoweledgable about programs. David it would be better if you got off my back and hope that people will forget your postering and what happened when you were challenged...........sad.......sad......sad but help is comming a newcomer just joined in, he may be the one who will take your place, he may be an antenna expert in disguise..... a few days will tell With sympathy Art KB9MZ........XG yes I am english born, what are you going to make of that if you are looking for something? Dave wrote: "Mike Lucas" wrote in message . .. "art" wrote in message oups.com... Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated. So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any program of you choice? I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults that have no grounding so I give up and will submit. I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only talked and for what reason? Further snip of rant Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be helping, rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as many of us lurkers find this thread of considerable entertainment value. Mike W5CHR then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his erroneous theories. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
David
Calm down, the die has been cast and people know that you had the chance but not the education to take part in it. This newsgroup is for debate and you were the one to take up the axe but when put to the test failed to show up. I think people will wonder why you ran away after all that talking, and you keep coming back at me for some reason. You must admit that others who are reading this are wondering why you deiced not to put me into the middle ages, there wasn't any conditions imposed not one and you talked about all the experience you have with different programs anbd because I didn't pose any conditions fell back on the notion or position that the programs are no good unless you know what you are doing. Yet you try to tell me you are knoweledgable about programs. David it would be better if you got off my back and hope that people will forget your postering and what happened when you were challenged...........sad.......sad......sad but help is comming a newcomer just joined in, he may be the one who will take your place, he may be an antenna expert in disguise..... a few days will tell With sympathy Art KB9MZ........XG yes I am english born, what are you going to make of that if you are looking for something? Dave wrote: "Mike Lucas" wrote in message . .. "art" wrote in message oups.com... Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated. So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any program of you choice? I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults that have no grounding so I give up and will submit. I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only talked and for what reason? Further snip of rant Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be helping, rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as many of us lurkers find this thread of considerable entertainment value. Mike W5CHR then you better get in here and contribute, I've got better things to do this weekend than argue with a lost cause. he's not even that much fun, its deteriorating into personal attacks instead of trying to explain his erroneous theories. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade
Art Mike Lucas wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated. So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any program of you choice? I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults that have no grounding so I give up and will submit. I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only talked and for what reason? Further snip of rant Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be helping, rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as many of us lurkers find this thread of considerable entertainment value. Mike W5CHR |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade
Art Mike Lucas wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated. So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any program of you choice? I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults that have no grounding so I give up and will submit. I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only talked and for what reason? Further snip of rant Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be helping, rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as many of us lurkers find this thread of considerable entertainment value. Mike W5CHR |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade
Art Mike Lucas wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... Massive snip of pseudo-bafflegab insert my array and thus shoot me to pieces and enhance your own statue within the group. Your chance to show off your superiority with respect to electromechanics, A simple way that affords you the chance to blow your trumpet where it can really can be heard and appreciated. So which way do you want to go,show a quotation that denies the possibility of my concept or simply apply a dimensional drawing to any program of you choice? I really wanted to wait for a person to come along that I could trust because of prior knoweledge, but I am getting tired of these assaults that have no grounding so I give up and will submit. I talked the talk and I walked the walk, in response you have only talked and for what reason? Further snip of rant Art: The stuff you're putting in the holiday eggnog doesn't seem to be helping, rather, you are blithering louder and longer. Please look after yourself, as many of us lurkers find this thread of considerable entertainment value. Mike W5CHR |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
art wrote:
Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade Art Which part? The part where you top post, the part where you never snip the old junk, or the part where you don't believe in paragraphs which makes your stuff a royal pain in the ass to read? snip old stuff -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
On 28 Dec 2006 15:27:29 -0800, "art" wrote:
Richard Richard Richard and Richard Hi Art, And I thought only Gauss could claim your heart. If you can't write about your 5 wires in the air, let's analyze your purple prose which has all the style of a crucifixion in a burlesque passion play. You choose. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Welcome, bring your friends, let them see for themselves what ham radio
is all about. The more the merrier. Richard and Roy have flogged this newsgroup for more than a decade and got rid of many a good ham so only are a few left but I am not going anywhere. I want as many people as I possibly can to see where I called their bluff and they ran away. Here we are a ham radio newsgroup doing what we should be doing, pulling people down scratching peoples eyes out anything to get an augument going this is what Richard and Roy have been doing for years and there are always suckers who will follow them. And now the code went up in flames and a few more disatisfied hams will get the ball rolling on another lengthy augument. If you really want to do something for ham radio tell your friends to come and have a look see as we are becoming quite a diverse group here and they all will probably fit in quite well. And yes point out how I was hammered by the so called experts on antennas and when I called their bluff they ran away Dave was his name egged on by Richard who is.. well I wont go into that,,, reading this will provide a good lesson for a lot of newbies in than when you are given advise by people postering as experts alway but always get a second or third opinion otherwise you may run into somebody like I did. Please, please call your friends so they can see what ham radio is all about, the more the merrier, their are a lot of people here willing to give advice and they aren't shy. Oh and by the way we follow the army thinking on this newsgroup meaning don't ask,don't tell so you will never know the person you are getting close to,don't say I didn't warn you. Art wrote: art wrote: Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade Art Which part? The part where you top post, the part where you never snip the old junk, or the part where you don't believe in paragraphs which makes your stuff a royal pain in the ass to read? snip old stuff -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
art wrote: Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade Art How can we miss it with the multi-postings? But in order for *you* to see the charade, I'm afraid a mirror will be needed. You **** and whine because no one can understand the silly jibber jabber you throw out... You **** and whine because no one will try to do or repeat work *you* should be doing, or already have done. The solution to your problem is actually very simple, and Dave has already given it to you. Build the dang thing and see if it works as you say on an antenna range. If it works as you say, *maybe* someone will see a use in it. If they do, *maybe* you can sell it. Simple. You don't even have to be born in England to fiqure that one out. A dumbass redneck Texan like I can see that simple solution in a half second. If you build it, and it works, maybe they will come. If you build it and it doesn't work, probably they won't. To foist among the public a "miracle whip" which you haven't even taken time to test in the real world is the ultimate charade. I can make a puter modeling program spit out nearly anything I want if I caress it in a favorable manner. I imagine others can too. Ask Cecil about his dipoles that show in excess of 20 dbi.. Sure the "supergain" can be there *if* you can get power to the antenna with that super low feedpoint Z. Good luck in the contest trying to achieve this task. I bet I could keep up with you using a regular coax fed dipole and 5 watts power. You seem to require our permission for you to tinker with this new miracle whip array. Well, you have my official permission to knock yourself out. BTW, why is it that you can't make post without whining about Roy, Richard, Dave, etc, etc. I was building a new fangled miracle whip, and they told me it wouldn't work as planned, I'd tend to listen to them myself. If I had trouble believing them, I would build a real antenna instead of arguing about it on usenet. If your theory? is correct, it should work as planned. If not.. Well... Time to conjur up a new miracle whip. Lurk mode off, and back to those silly boat wrecking rednecks in Deliverence.. MK |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
art wrote: Welcome, bring your friends, let them see for themselves what ham radio is all about. The more the merrier. Richard and Roy have flogged this newsgroup for more than a decade and got rid of many a good ham so only are a few left but I am not going anywhere. I want as many people as I possibly can to see where I called their bluff and they ran away. Here we are a ham radio newsgroup doing what we should be doing, pulling people down scratching peoples eyes out anything to get an augument going this is what Richard and Roy have been doing for years and there are always suckers who will follow them. And now the code went up in flames and a few more disatisfied hams will get the ball rolling on another lengthy augument. If you really want to do something for ham radio tell your friends to come and have a look see as we are becoming quite a diverse group here and they all will probably fit in quite well. And yes point out how I was hammered by the so called experts on antennas and when I called their bluff they ran away Dave was his name egged on by Richard who is.. well I wont go into that,,, reading this will provide a good lesson for a lot of newbies in than when you are given advise by people postering as experts alway but always get a second or third opinion otherwise you may run into somebody like I did. Please, please call your friends so they can see what ham radio is all about, the more the merrier, their are a lot of people here willing to give advice and they aren't shy. Oh and by the way we follow the army thinking on this newsgroup meaning don't ask,don't tell so you will never know the person you are getting close to,don't say I didn't warn you. Art Woe is Art. Yes, it is true. We have bludgened poor ole Art into obvious submission. Beaten down, bloody, but not whipped yet!!!, sayeth Art. Isn't flogging the practice of using those tassled whips against ones own body, or am I thinking of something else. I may be confused, cuz I R A redneck. If I'm thinking of the correct term and practice, then this would fit well. Why? Cuz every time I read one of your posts, I get the impression you are flogging yourself with one of those tassled leather whips. To an innocent bystander, this might give the impression that Art is battling a mighty heavy fly problem. Or maybe he itches badly.. I dunno.. Woe is Art. Woe is Art's latest antenna too.. There I said it. A big slap with the tassled miracle whip I give to thee.. :/ Woe is Art. MK |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
art wrote: Just loved your contribution to this thread, we need more people like you on this group to guide others how they should participate, yours is an excellent example Cheers Art Thanks Art. Always glad to help out. Anytime.. Just give me a ring. MK |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Atta boy don't give up we need more examples to show everybody what ham
radio is all about and we have in our newsgroup Roy who is able to sell his wares to you at a cheeap price. The fact that he is the author of that comes up regularly and he likes conversation to revolve about it as that is what he is here for to make money and having fun stiring up trouble. Tell others they will be in excellent company if only they will join the newsgroup. Actually you fit in quite well with him not for stirring up trouble but to get people to the newsgroup to see what ham radio is all about. We have archives to so they can check back on the likes of Richard and Roy over the years to see how many hams they have tangled with and I mean real hams whose names are easily recognisable Look this is your chance to show others how much you enjoy ham radio I am sure they will be impressed with your writings so that they can also join the fun...keep going going going going go wrote: art wrote: Welcome, bring your friends, let them see for themselves what ham radio is all about. The more the merrier. Richard and Roy have flogged this newsgroup for more than a decade and got rid of many a good ham so only are a few left but I am not going anywhere. I want as many people as I possibly can to see where I called their bluff and they ran away. Here we are a ham radio newsgroup doing what we should be doing, pulling people down scratching peoples eyes out anything to get an augument going this is what Richard and Roy have been doing for years and there are always suckers who will follow them. And now the code went up in flames and a few more disatisfied hams will get the ball rolling on another lengthy augument. If you really want to do something for ham radio tell your friends to come and have a look see as we are becoming quite a diverse group here and they all will probably fit in quite well. And yes point out how I was hammered by the so called experts on antennas and when I called their bluff they ran away Dave was his name egged on by Richard who is.. well I wont go into that,,, reading this will provide a good lesson for a lot of newbies in than when you are given advise by people postering as experts alway but always get a second or third opinion otherwise you may run into somebody like I did. Please, please call your friends so they can see what ham radio is all about, the more the merrier, their are a lot of people here willing to give advice and they aren't shy. Oh and by the way we follow the army thinking on this newsgroup meaning don't ask,don't tell so you will never know the person you are getting close to,don't say I didn't warn you. Art Woe is Art. Yes, it is true. We have bludgened poor ole Art into obvious submission. Beaten down, bloody, but not whipped yet!!!, sayeth Art. Isn't flogging the practice of using those tassled whips against ones own body, or am I thinking of something else. I may be confused, cuz I R A redneck. If I'm thinking of the correct term and practice, then this would fit well. Why? Cuz every time I read one of your posts, I get the impression you are flogging yourself with one of those tassled leather whips. To an innocent bystander, this might give the impression that Art is battling a mighty heavy fly problem. Or maybe he itches badly.. I dunno.. Woe is Art. Woe is Art's latest antenna too.. There I said it. A big slap with the tassled miracle whip I give to thee.. :/ Woe is Art. MK |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Great I knew you would like that, we need experienced antenna experts
like you on this group , your instant judgements on antennas are a delight to all, quick fast and to the point what ever your point is Have you called any of your buddies yet I am anxious to swell the rankings of this group, it seems to get bigger my the minuit Advertise the newsgroup of Ham Radio so we can get the numbers up of people like yorself a perfect example of what people are missing by not joining us. We are so much better than CB if you like the fighting banter Cheers and beers Art wrote: art wrote: Just loved your contribution to this thread, we need more people like you on this group to guide others how they should participate, yours is an excellent example Cheers Art Thanks Art. Always glad to help out. Anytime.. Just give me a ring. MK |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
art wrote: Great I knew you would like that, we need experienced antenna experts like you on this group , your instant judgements on antennas are a delight to all, quick fast and to the point what ever your point is Yea, my point is for me to know, and others to find out... Have you called any of your buddies yet Nope.. I'm on a new movie now... The boat wrecking rednecks went home. I am anxious to swell the rankings of this group, it seems to get bigger my the minuit Not me.. The more posts, the longer it takes me to read them. People, lets keep things simple if you please.. Thank you. Advertise the newsgroup of Ham Radio so we can get the numbers up of people like yorself a perfect example of what people are missing by not joining us. This place is a hoot, thats fer sure.. CW, CB, Rednecks, Miracle Whips, heck, what for can you ask for? We are so much better than CB if you like the fighting banter This ain't ham radio or CB. This is usenet. Cheers and beers Well, I might have one new years maybe... But I generally don't drink anymore. And if I did, it probably won't be a beer. More like a big Texas sized heaping helping of Crown Royal, the favored brew of us fisticated rednecks. But I probably won't, cuz it would give me brain damage the next day. I can't afford to lose any brain cells if I want to deal with sharp guys like you on a regular basis. :/ Woe is me.. MK |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
|
Gaussian law and time varying fields
"art" wrote in message ups.com... Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade the only charade is your rather transparent attempt to draw those on here into a fight. you'll need some better technical material to do that though. your other postings about the death of ham radio and its replacement by the internet make this even more obvious, you never wanted to discuss antennas, you just wanted to draw someone into an endless discussion of your bafflegab. the problem is, you didn't have anything good to start with, i have successfully done that on this news group, but you have to start with the right lures and enough knowledge to keep it interesting. you degenerated too quickly to name calling and lost all technical interest, so good bye and enjoy the new year alone in your thread. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Good riddance to you Dave you never produced evidence about antennas in
your position in the hit group . You posture about your wide experience but they are just words. You are a taker not a giver You ran away when I took up your bluff when you thought your bluster had succeeded but you have now been exposed as another self perceived expert who when challenged shrivelled away back to your original size as the bloating oozed away. Fortunately everybody got to see it for themselves and hopefully some lurkers to share the tail with others Sad, sad ,sad always sad when a ballon sinks to the ground as the hot air leaks away to leave just a wrinkled skin Art .. Dave wrote: "art" wrote in message ups.com... Glad there are some lurkers out there to see this charade the only charade is your rather transparent attempt to draw those on here into a fight. you'll need some better technical material to do that though. your other postings about the death of ham radio and its replacement by the internet make this even more obvious, you never wanted to discuss antennas, you just wanted to draw someone into an endless discussion of your bafflegab. the problem is, you didn't have anything good to start with, i have successfully done that on this news group, but you have to start with the right lures and enough knowledge to keep it interesting. you degenerated too quickly to name calling and lost all technical interest, so good bye and enjoy the new year alone in your thread. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
"art" wrote in message oups.com... Good riddance to you Dave you never produced evidence about antennas in your position in the hit group . You posture about your wide experience but they are just words. You are a taker not a giver Art Arty, Dave has more antennas than you ever saw in your life, all you have is incoherent bafflegab crap, then insults, and patent that tells the world that reflector is shorter than driven element, etc. For that, Her Majesty awarded you life time callsign M0RON. Your other crap about America and ham radio just paints the complete picture of your mental state. Frankly my dear, you are full of sheeeeet! 73 bada BUm one of those who is incapable of comprehending your "genius" |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
I knew that eventually you would show up expressing your bad language
At least onlookers have another entrant to show what ham radio really is. The perception that ham radio is a public service doesn't seem to stand up so good when they get to see what ham radio comprises of. Thanks for coming in to let people know what joining ham radio operators really entails. Pop back often to educate the on lookers Art Yuri Blanarovich wrote: "art" wrote in message oups.com... Good riddance to you Dave you never produced evidence about antennas in your position in the hit group . You posture about your wide experience but they are just words. You are a taker not a giver Art Arty, Dave has more antennas than you ever saw in your life, all you have is incoherent bafflegab crap, then insults, and patent that tells the world that reflector is shorter than driven element, etc. For that, Her Majesty awarded you life time callsign M0RON. Your other crap about America and ham radio just paints the complete picture of your mental state. Frankly my dear, you are full of sheeeeet! 73 bada BUm one of those who is incapable of comprehending your "genius" |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
Hey, what about our present "public servants"?? Look at what they're
made up of and they "shine" as exemplary role models. Not exactly! Maybe we should get rid of them since they set an example as good as most hams (according to you) ;) Scott art wrote: At least onlookers have another entrant to show what ham radio really is. The perception that ham radio is a public service doesn't seem to stand up so good when they get to see what ham radio comprises of. |
Gaussian law and time varying fields
They may bve an example of what America is and may also represent the
ham population. The country is bitterly divided and people are being sent to die by polititions who are in the trade for personal greed. We just had another election and all we did was move from one rotten barrel to another. We have told the world that they are with us or against us but they see the U.S. starting to fade. having comandeered the U.N. more and more countries are turning away. The world is changing and military might is withering in the face of individual resistance. It is showing up all around the World and has some beginnings in the U.S. but the Government can do nothing to avoid it since we are in debt to the World and efforts to right the situation will anger the citizens. Law is breaking down, states are moving away from federal assistance with respect to the invasion the Country is undergoing. Polititions on the local scene to arrest people who smoke but the local police are refusing to back them up The Civil libities group have now encircled the giant while he slept with fine thread such that movement is impossible and where we will see the union wither as States decide to rule their own destiny and use what was Federal money for better purposes at home. It may well be in my lifetime that the LA riots will suddenly explode all over the country and unenployed workers will take to fire against all that are perceived in destroying the Country and where the incomming population may well lead the return of lands to Mexico purely by numbers operating under our democratic laws knowing full well that Law has broken down and no one is interested in supplying food to a prison population while some on the outside are starving. We have a lot of beligerent people in the U.S. as well as in the declining ham population, just look at this antenna group for examples. Us old guys made our money by taking the future spoils now knowing full well that the ball is in the air waiting to strike a target after we have gone and where discipline, an unknown word in America will have to rely on a spanish speaking National Guard that puts us in the3 same situation as Irak. On top of all this sectarian divisiopns are taking place where the church is asking its worshippers to defy the Government. American is now a multi piece jig saw pussle that is being jolted side to side and where the individual pieces are losing the interlocking glue that once made them whole. This group is a prime sample of America today all pulling in different directions as we move towards being a banana state along side some states populated by those who won the money in the selling of America. History will decide you fate, count the wars that we have started after world war 2 have we made it a better place or a worse place and what can we do to fix a non disaplined population without the ability to enforce corrective action or worse we are bankrupt. Art Scott wrote: Hey, what about our present "public servants"?? Look at what they're made up of and they "shine" as exemplary role models. Not exactly! Maybe we should get rid of them since they set an example as good as most hams (according to you) ;) Scott art wrote: At least onlookers have another entrant to show what ham radio really is. The perception that ham radio is a public service doesn't seem to stand up so good when they get to see what ham radio comprises of. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:09 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com