On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 21:47:05 -0800, Richard Clark wrote:

On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 19:49:38 -0600, Nate Bargmann
wrote:

I have studied W8JI's material more closely and I see that he
found that the traps have lower loss above the design frequency than at
it. This would suggest that a 10m trap might be better implemented at a
design frequency of 27.5 MHz than 28.4 MHz.

I think this is what I'll shoot for.

Sorry Nate,

I don't follow the logic of this at all. Are you expecting the trap
to cut off all frequencies above 27.5 MHz?

This is what W8JI's site hints at. Is he wrong, or am I misunderstanding
him?

- Nate

--

"The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds,
the pessimist fears this is true."