Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yuri Blanarovich wrote:
Nobody has argued the seven points I raised earlier, and those who measured, including W8JI found that current IS different (but still says it is NOT). The reality is that current is different, Eznec can't model it, ... Yuri, have you read Wes's article? Using wire segments, he modeled a loading coil in EZNEC. His segmented wire model of a coil shows a current taper through the coil. It's on his web page at: http://www.qsl.net/n7ws You can also download Wes's zipped EZNEC files. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |