Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Wes Stewart wrote:
Mine aren't Laplace loads. There are straight RLC with C=0. The 'LO' display says "Laplace Coefficients", "Select to show values", and the values are all zero. The feedpoint impedance of the antenna is infinite. I believe that you have stated that in your Kraus reference that he used the self-resonance of the inductors to do the magic. No magic - just relatively simple experiments. 1/2WL of a helical antenna reverses the phase of the current just like a 1/2WL wire does, over ground or in free space. How on Earth can you expect a load consisting of only R and Xl to be self-resonant? I *don't* expect such a coil to simulate reality. That's the whole problem. The artificial lumped load software doesn't match reality. It only approaches reality for "physically small" coils. Once again, a 75m Texas Bugcatcher coil is not physically small. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |