LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old February 5th 04, 08:57 PM
Richard Clark
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:08:30 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:
forward current is always greater than reflected current,
EZNEC displays net current.

On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 14:22:29 -0600, Cecil Moore
wrote:

the current flowing into the bottom of the coil, according to EZNEC,
is 0.18 amp at -54 degrees.
The current flowing out the top of the coil is 0.2
amp at 126 degrees. Those two currents are flowing in exactly
opposite directions. How do you explain that?


Well with the wisdom accumulated thus far you don't know how to use
and or interpret EZNEC (fairly obvious). Let's look at the howlers:
forward current is always greater than reflected current,

compared to:
the current flowing into... 0.18 amp
The current flowing out ... is 0.2 amp


OR
the current flowing into... bottom of the coil

Forward compared to Reverse
The current flowing out ... top of the coil

which describes the same direction: into bottom - out of top.

Such logical knots (nuts) are derived from the faulty application of
EZNEC displays net current.


73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
current/inductance discusion Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 54 January 4th 04 07:08 PM
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) Dr. Slick Antenna 199 September 12th 03 10:06 PM
Eznec modeling loading coils? Roy Lewallen Antenna 11 August 18th 03 02:40 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017