Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
Cecil Moore wrote: Yep, and for the same power level, a higher impedance usually means a lower current and vice versa. But the impedance *at* such points does not affect the current *at* those points? Cause and effect, Jim. Hint: The impedance equals v/i and is completely virtual, i.e. clearly a result, not a cause. Even the feedpoint impedance of an antenna is a ratio of v/i which is often simply the result of interference between forward and reflected waves. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |