On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:40:15 -0500, "Jimmie D"
wrote:

May I suggest that everyone hold there
responses until you say all you have to say encluding posting the relevant
equations with references.

On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 14:52:58 -0500, "Jimmie D"
wrote:

Please explain the "faulty mathmatics from the masters"
Please show equations with proofs.

Wow! From Hero to Zero in 12 minutes and 33 seconds.

Jimmie, you could have waited the obligatory 12 days, 33 hours and 54
thousand seconds to discover there are no facts to be had that
1. Contradict ordinary-as-mud modeling;
2. Reveal theories that would astonish the multitudes;
3. Offer a revelation of how statics can perform what dynamics do
daily. And certainly
4. No evidence of the comprehension that statics are a mathematical
fiction. Life does not allow them, and they are completely unknown
outside of a book or a classroom.

Art cannot even explain how he obtained a 50 Ohm non-reactive feed
into his five assorted wires, non of which could have possible
supported a fifth of that value (and jacked up with so much reactance
as to reject all power).

As for your first observation above about waiting. The poster is
entirely responsible for content, both its length and its purpose.
This can be as easily achieved in one posting as in 200. If the past
is to inform us of how efficiently that process has been successful;
then your cæsura || is entirely justified.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC