Yesterday I came across an example where thinking went astray.
My Runco three large CRT projector failed and I traced it to the first
power
supply of all things. There were four square power resisters, two in
series
but what hit me in the head was that the draftsman had put these
resisters in a tight touching square Now you must know that you
add a fudge factor to the power level but you never cancel it by
removing circulation. They didn't have the apearance of damage
but I took them out anyway. True enough two in parallel had blown
and the engineer probably asked for them to be in parallel to provide
the required surface area. I replaced them with tubular hollow wre
wounds
with separation. To many it is only obvious after the fact or shall I
call
them monday morning quarter backs.
I will see the superbowl in my home theatre with a grin on my face
Art

art wrote:
Yesterday I came across an example where thinking went astray.
My Runco three large CRT projector failed and I traced it to the first
power
supply of all things. There were four square power resisters, two in
series
but what hit me in the head was that the draftsman had put these
resisters in a tight touching square Now you must know that you
add a fudge factor to the power level but you never cancel it by
removing circulation. They didn't have the apearance of damage
but I took them out anyway. True enough two in parallel had blown
and the engineer probably asked for them to be in parallel to provide
the required surface area. I replaced them with tubular hollow wre
wounds
with separation. To many it is only obvious after the fact or shall I
call
them monday morning quarter backs.
I will see the superbowl in my home theatre with a grin on my face
Art


How many hours did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded
it's expected lifetime.

"gwatts" wrote in message
...
art wrote:
Yesterday I came across an example where thinking went astray.
My Runco three large CRT projector failed and I traced it to the first
power
supply of all things. There were four square power resisters, two in
series
but what hit me in the head was that the draftsman had put these
resisters in a tight touching square Now you must know that you
add a fudge factor to the power level but you never cancel it by
removing circulation. They didn't have the apearance of damage
but I took them out anyway. True enough two in parallel had blown
and the engineer probably asked for them to be in parallel to provide
the required surface area. I replaced them with tubular hollow wre
wounds
with separation. To many it is only obvious after the fact or shall I
call
them monday morning quarter backs.
I will see the superbowl in my home theatre with a grin on my face Art


How many hours did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded it's
expected lifetime.

Yes these are begining to show up in Goodwill stores.

I agree, my 8 inch CRTs have very little hours on them tho I am always
looking for spare tubes. I mentioned it to Curt who fixes them and he
stated it is not the first time he has seen power resisters blow in the
supply.
Manufacturers don't want to add a lot of fans because of the noise.
Similar things happen with the Hitachi rear projection t.v.s maybe
that's why so many are failing. The idea of using two power resisters
in parallel instead of just one of a lower value is purely to take
advantage of the increased surface area, in this case the problem
excabated because the resistors were of the square form so the
draftsman probably placed the four in a tight touching square for
neatness which retarded circulation.i The hollow ohmites that I put in
should solve that oversight. The 8 inch crt forms were made by an
unknown company in Japan for Zenith who then supplied them to G.E., nec
and Runco for relabeling so it may well be a one type set thing
..Have a single lamp projector of Runco but liquid spilt on the power
supply and burnt the traces as well. Do you have the schematic? By the
way the 8 inch crt are underdriven which is a huge advantage in terms
of life. The early forms were over driven which forced designers to go
back to the 7 inch forms and below in the case of rear projection to
accomplish better life.
By the way on single lamp incandescent projector forms I replace the
inside bulb when they fail and use a wire clip to hold it in, much
cheaper than paying a few hundred dollars to replace. I would expect
that the new rear projection lights on the new tvs would benefit from
the same treatment.. I do have a lot of fun playing around with things
to retard the oncomming old age.
Art

gwatts wrote:
art wrote:
Yesterday I came across an example where thinking went astray.
My Runco three large CRT projector failed and I traced it to the first
power
supply of all things. There were four square power resisters, two in
series
but what hit me in the head was that the draftsman had put these
resisters in a tight touching square Now you must know that you
add a fudge factor to the power level but you never cancel it by
removing circulation. They didn't have the apearance of damage
but I took them out anyway. True enough two in parallel had blown
and the engineer probably asked for them to be in parallel to provide
the required surface area. I replaced them with tubular hollow wre
wounds
with separation. To many it is only obvious after the fact or shall I
call
them monday morning quarter backs.
I will see the superbowl in my home theatre with a grin on my face
Art


How many hours did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded
it's expected lifetime.

"art" wrote in message
ups.com...
I agree, my 8 inch CRTs have very little hours on them tho I am always
looking for spare tubes. I mentioned it to Curt who fixes them and he
stated it is not the first time he has seen power resisters blow in the
supply.
Manufacturers don't want to add a lot of fans because of the noise.
Similar things happen with the Hitachi rear projection t.v.s maybe
that's why so many are failing. The idea of using two power resisters
in parallel instead of just one of a lower value is purely to take
advantage of the increased surface area, in this case the problem
excabated because the resistors were of the square form so the
draftsman probably placed the four in a tight touching square for
neatness which retarded circulation.i The hollow ohmites that I put in
should solve that oversight. The 8 inch crt forms were made by an
unknown company in Japan for Zenith who then supplied them to G.E., nec
and Runco for relabeling so it may well be a one type set thing
.Have a single lamp projector of Runco but liquid spilt on the power
supply and burnt the traces as well. Do you have the schematic? By the
way the 8 inch crt are underdriven which is a huge advantage in terms
of life. The early forms were over driven which forced designers to go
back to the 7 inch forms and below in the case of rear projection to
accomplish better life.
By the way on single lamp incandescent projector forms I replace the
inside bulb when they fail and use a wire clip to hold it in, much
cheaper than paying a few hundred dollars to replace. I would expect
that the new rear projection lights on the new tvs would benefit from
the same treatment.. I do have a lot of fun playing around with things
to retard the oncomming old age.
Art

gwatts wrote:
art wrote:
Yesterday I came across an example where thinking went astray.
My Runco three large CRT projector failed and I traced it to the first
power
supply of all things. There were four square power resisters, two in
series
but what hit me in the head was that the draftsman had put these
resisters in a tight touching square Now you must know that you
add a fudge factor to the power level but you never cancel it by
removing circulation. They didn't have the apearance of damage
but I took them out anyway. True enough two in parallel had blown
and the engineer probably asked for them to be in parallel to provide
the required surface area. I replaced them with tubular hollow wre
wounds
with separation. To many it is only obvious after the fact or shall I
call
them monday morning quarter backs.
I will see the superbowl in my home theatre with a grin on my face
Art


How many hours did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded
it's expected lifetime.


Doubt if it was a fault in engineering. If the engineers had their way it
would probably be a dale heatsinked to the chassis.Often one engineering
team designs it and another goes through to find out how they can cut
corners.

On 23 Jan, 14:49, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"art" wrote in oglegroups.com...





I agree, my 8 inch CRTs have very little hours on them tho I am always
looking for spare tubes. I mentioned it to Curt who fixes them and he
stated it is not the first time he has seen power resisters blow in the
supply.
Manufacturers don't want to add a lot of fans because of the noise.
Similar things happen with the Hitachi rear projection t.v.s maybe
that's why so many are failing. The idea of using two power resisters
in parallel instead of just one of a lower value is purely to take
advantage of the increased surface area, in this case the problem
excabated because the resistors were of the square form so the
draftsman probably placed the four in a tight touching square for
neatness which retarded circulation.i The hollow ohmites that I put in
should solve that oversight. The 8 inch crt forms were made by an
unknown company in Japan for Zenith who then supplied them to G.E., nec
and Runco for relabeling so it may well be a one type set thing
.Have a single lamp projector of Runco but liquid spilt on the power
supply and burnt the traces as well. Do you have the schematic? By the
way the 8 inch crt are underdriven which is a huge advantage in terms
of life. The early forms were over driven which forced designers to go
back to the 7 inch forms and below in the case of rear projection to
accomplish better life.
By the way on single lamp incandescent projector forms I replace the
inside bulb when they fail and use a wire clip to hold it in, much
cheaper than paying a few hundred dollars to replace. I would expect
that the new rear projection lights on the new tvs would benefit from
the same treatment.. I do have a lot of fun playing around with things
to retard the oncomming old age.
Art

gwatts wrote:
art wrote:
Yesterday I came across an example where thinking went astray.
My Runco three large CRT projector failed and I traced it to the first
power
supply of all things. There were four square power resisters, two in
series
but what hit me in the head was that the draftsman had put these
resisters in a tight touching square Now you must know that you
add a fudge factor to the power level but you never cancel it by
removing circulation. They didn't have the apearance of damage
but I took them out anyway. True enough two in parallel had blown
and the engineer probably asked for them to be in parallel to provide
the required surface area. I replaced them with tubular hollow wre
wounds
with separation. To many it is only obvious after the fact or shall I
call
them monday morning quarter backs.
I will see the superbowl in my home theatre with a grin on my face
Art

How many hours did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded
it's expected lifetime.Doubt if it was a fault in engineering. If the engineers had their way it
would probably be a dale heatsinked to the chassis.Often one engineering
team designs it and another goes through to find out how they can cut
corners.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

On 23 Jan, 14:49, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"art" wrote in oglegroups.com...




snipurs did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded
it's expected lifetime.Doubt if it was a fault in engineering. If the engineers had their way it
would probably be a dale heatsinked to the chassis.Often one engineering
team designs it and another goes through to find out how they can cut
corners.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

Jimmy it is rare to use two resisters instead of one because a board
becomes bigger
and introduces cost. When you get to power resisters it is not unusual
to place two
in parallel and accept the cost. In this case a cost improver would
try to make the case
for one single resister instead of four since a Dale with heatsink
would be
comparitively prohibative. The engineers calculation for wattage may
well have
been correct without being side blinded by the fact of some square
form resisters.
Art

"art" wrote in message
oups.com...


On 23 Jan, 14:49, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"art" wrote in
oglegroups.com...




snipurs did you have on this projector at failure? Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy, judging by the projectors
I've seen over the past few years a three CRT projector has exceeded
it's expected lifetime.Doubt if it was a fault in engineering. If the
engineers had their way it
would probably be a dale heatsinked to the chassis.Often one engineering
team designs it and another goes through to find out how they can cut
corners.- Hide quoted text -- Show quoted text -

Jimmy it is rare to use two resisters instead of one because a board
becomes bigger
and introduces cost. When you get to power resisters it is not unusual
to place two
in parallel and accept the cost. In this case a cost improver would
try to make the case
for one single resister instead of four since a Dale with heatsink
would be
comparitively prohibative. The engineers calculation for wattage may
well have
been correct without being side blinded by the fact of some square
form resisters.
Art


Depends on the cost of the resistors. Prices seem to increase somewhat
expotentially with wattage so the two smaller ones may have been cheaper
than one larger. In this case the cost improver would have went for the
multiple resistors.

art wrote:

On 23 Jan, 14:49, "Jimmie D" wrote:
"art" wrote in oglegroups.com...

...Part of
engineering a design is lifetime expectancy...
...Doubt if it was a fault in engineering. If the engineers had their way it
would probably be a dale heatsinked to the chassis.Often one engineering
team designs it and another goes through to find out how they can cut
corners.

Jimmy it is rare to use two resisters instead of one because a board
becomes bigger
and introduces cost.

If they used one resistor in another place or places it's could have
been easier to use multiples in series/parallel where they could rather
than purchase and stock another value at the factory. I worked at a
place where we used 5532 op amps in many audio circuits and in one place
as a flip flop so we wouldn't have to stock a 74xx or 40xx just for that
one use. It was easier on the assemblers to have one bin of chips,
better quantity pricing, no sweating running out of one part kept in
smaller quantity, (insert more bean counter stuff...)