RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   Antenna (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/)
-   -   stripline for 13.56 MHz (https://www.radiobanter.com/antenna/1142-stripline-13-56-mhz.html)

Massi January 27th 04 09:15 AM

stripline for 13.56 MHz
 
Hello to everybody,
first of all I say sorry for my bad English and for my really bad knowledge.
I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?
Thank you,

Massimo



Crazy George January 27th 04 02:44 PM

A half wavelength at that frequency is about 10 meters. Hard to fold that
up in a small tag. Figure all dimensions are 1000X when translating from
microwaves to HF.

--
Crazy George
Remove N O and S P A M imbedded in return address
"Massi" wrote in message
...
Hello to everybody,
first of all I say sorry for my bad English and for my really bad

knowledge.
I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding

GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?
Thank you,

Massimo





Helmut Wabnig January 27th 04 04:31 PM

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:15:57 +0100, "Massi"
wrote:

Hello to everybody,
first of all I say sorry for my bad English and for my really bad knowledge.
I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?
Thank you,



no strip lines necessary, this 13,56 MHz frequency is "DC radio" ,
a rather low frequency application.

Look there for a detailed description:

http://www.ti.com/tiris/docs/manuals...esignNotes.pdf


w.

Steve Nosko January 27th 04 05:31 PM


"Massi" wrote in message
...
Hello to everybody,
[...] I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if

is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding

GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?


Yes. Just use a resonant circuit "open to the air".
--
Steve N, K,9;d, c. i My email has no u's.



Tom Bruhns January 27th 04 06:33 PM

Stripline will work fine at 13MHz. I'd expect it to have a
characteristic impedance that's practically identical to what it has
at microwave frequencies, for any practical size line. If it's a
short run connecting to a load that's the same impedance as the line,
that's probably all you need to know, but if you're using it for a
matching stub or series matching section, you'll need to worry about
loss and propagation velocity and things like that...and in general,
at 13MHz you'll find it more efficient in both volume and power loss
to use a lumped matching network.

Tell us more specifically what you are trying to do, and we may be
able to give more help.

Cheers,
Tom

"Massi" wrote in message ...
Hello to everybody,
first of all I say sorry for my bad English and for my really bad knowledge.
I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?
Thank you,

Massimo


Steve Nosko January 27th 04 10:38 PM

From reading between the lines (RFID) I got the impression the OP was after
an antenna not a transmission line.
Steve N.

"Tom Bruhns" wrote in message
m...
Stripline will work fine at 13MHz. I'd expect it to have a
characteristic impedance that's practically identical to what it has
at microwave frequencies, for any practical size line. If it's a
short run connecting to a load that's the same impedance as the line,
that's probably all you need to know, but if you're using it for a
matching stub or series matching section, you'll need to worry about
loss and propagation velocity and things like that...and in general,
at 13MHz you'll find it more efficient in both volume and power loss
to use a lumped matching network.

Tell us more specifically what you are trying to do, and we may be
able to give more help.

Cheers,
Tom

"Massi" wrote in message

...
Hello to everybody,
first of all I say sorry for my bad English and for my really bad

knowledge.
I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding

GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?
Thank you,

Massimo




Mark January 28th 04 03:46 AM

On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 10:15:57 +0100, "Massi"
wrote:

Hello to everybody,
first of all I say sorry for my bad English and for my really bad knowledge.
I'm projecting an antenna for RFID (13.56 MHz) and I don't know if is
possible to use a strip line with this frequency.
I've seen that in some books there are some theory equations regarding GHz,
but nothing about Mhz.
Is the wavelenght too long compare to the dimension of a stripline?
Thank you,

Massimo


Most people just use a resonant loop and work with the (relatively)
low radiation efficiency. Most RFID applications are close range, so
the antenna's radiation pattern is of little concern. Many application
notes on the web describe calculating the inductance of the loop and
the tuning procedures necessary to achieve resonance at the desired Q
(which affects bandwidth).

Mark

Massi January 29th 04 07:03 AM

Thanks a lot for all the answers,
I'm doing some tests in laboratory with a network analyzer and will let you
know asap what I will find.
Massimo



Massi January 30th 04 05:44 PM

"Massi" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Thanks a lot for all the answers,
I'm doing some tests in laboratory with a network analyzer and will let

you
know asap what I will find.
Massimo

I have done some tests with trasmission line builded in FR4 (30cm long, 2cm
wide), according to them I have the following notes:
VSWR MICROSTRIP 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0129
1 GHz = 1.0457
3 GHz = 1.0994
VSWR COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0250
1 GHz = 1.1698
3 GHz = 1.3500
VSWR STRIPLINE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0315
1 GHz = 1.0269
3 GHz = 1.2665

LOSS MICROSTRIP 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = - 0.03360 dB
1 GHz = - 0.83380 dB
3 GHz = - 2.40590 dB
LOSS COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = - 0.04660 dB
1 GHz = - 0.84300 dB
3 GHz = - 2.12640 dB
LOSS STRIPLINE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = - 0.06340 dB
1 GHz = - 1.00830 dB
3 GHz = - 3.05160 dB

bye,
Massimo



John Smith January 30th 04 09:07 PM


"Massi" wrote in message
. ..
"Massi" ha scritto nel messaggio
...
Thanks a lot for all the answers,
I'm doing some tests in laboratory with a network analyzer and will let

you
know asap what I will find.
Massimo

I have done some tests with trasmission line builded in FR4 (30cm long,

2cm
wide), according to them I have the following notes:
VSWR MICROSTRIP 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0129
1 GHz = 1.0457
3 GHz = 1.0994
VSWR COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0250
1 GHz = 1.1698
3 GHz = 1.3500
VSWR STRIPLINE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0315
1 GHz = 1.0269
3 GHz = 1.2665

LOSS MICROSTRIP 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = - 0.03360 dB
1 GHz = - 0.83380 dB
3 GHz = - 2.40590 dB
LOSS COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = - 0.04660 dB
1 GHz = - 0.84300 dB
3 GHz = - 2.12640 dB
LOSS STRIPLINE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = - 0.06340 dB
1 GHz = - 1.00830 dB
3 GHz = - 3.05160 dB

bye,
Massimo




Isn't waveguide kind of big at 13.56 MHz?

John



Massi February 2nd 04 03:13 PM

Isn't waveguide kind of big at 13.56 MHz?

John


forgive me, but I don't understand what you mean.
Massimo



John Smith February 3rd 04 12:49 PM


"Massi" wrote in message
...
Isn't waveguide kind of big at 13.56 MHz?

John


forgive me, but I don't understand what you mean.
Massimo



Well, you said:

"VSWR COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0250
1 GHz = 1.1698
3 GHz = 1.3500"

Maybe I don't understand coplanar waveguide, but I thought it would have to
be really big to fit 13.56 MHz inside.

John



Dave Shrader February 3rd 04 06:25 PM

I sent Massimo direct mail asking if he really meant 13.56 MHz. He
responded, YES!

I still wonder if he is having a language problem understanding MHz and
GHz!!

John Smith wrote:

"Massi" wrote in message
...

Isn't waveguide kind of big at 13.56 MHz?

John


forgive me, but I don't understand what you mean.
Massimo




Well, you said:

"VSWR COPLANAR WAVEGUIDE 50 OHM
13.56 MHz = 1.0250
1 GHz = 1.1698
3 GHz = 1.3500"

Maybe I don't understand coplanar waveguide, but I thought it would have to
be really big to fit 13.56 MHz inside.

John




Dave Shrader February 4th 04 07:21 PM

Massi wrote:

SNIP

So, it is a fact that English is not my language, but when I say
MegaHertz I mean MegaHertz (= 1000000 Hz).


Massimo, no offense was intended. I was just looking to make sure you
meant MHz.

Sorry if my post offended you. If so I ask your forgiveness.

Deacon Dave


SNIP


J. Harvey February 4th 04 10:12 PM

"Dave Shrader"
...asking if he really meant 13.56 MHz...


"John Smith"
Yes, GHz would make much more sense.


Except that 13.56 MHz is a very, very well known (common) ISM
frequency.

....well, perhaps not as well known as it might be... ;-)

Amusingly, most of the 30 Google hits on "13.56 GHz" are errors where
people have incorrectly assumed GHz for such RFID usage.

Stripline at HF ?? Geesh... I supposed if you've got the 'real
estate'.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com