LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old February 7th 07, 09:00 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 158
Default antenna hight

The total distance between the transmitting and receiving antenna of a
microwave link at 10GHz, is 30 Km. the height of the Tx antenna is
above ground level is 20 m. the maximum acceptable total path loss is
169 dB. Furthermore there is hill located 10 km away from the
transmitter antenna with a height of 80m.

calculate the height of the receiver antenna for the path loss to be
just equal to the maximum acceptable value?


1. Antenna essentially operates in free space with no near field ground
losses because the wavelength is extremely small (3.3cm) compared to 20m
antenna height at the transmitter.

2. The effect of the 80m hill 10Km away is negligible. The arc tan is only
.008 degrees, thus the transmitter hardly "sees" it.

3. The path loss seen by an atenna at 0 feet is then 131.8 dB (Path Loss =
20log(4*pi*d/lambda)), which is much less than the desired 169dB maximum.

Answer: 0 Feet.


Definitely NOT 0 feet.

Even without the hill in the way the curvature of the earth means that the
radio horizon is at about 20km with the tx on a 20m mast. 0.6 Fresnel
clearance occurs at about 6km. and the path loss exceeds 180dB.!!
The Rx mast needs to be at about 25m to obtain a 0.6 fresnel zone clearance,
WITHOUT a hill.This would give about 150dB path loss.

Adding the 80m hill at 10km gives a single knife edge diffraction, that
increases the path loss enormously to about 200dB!!

This path loss does not change significantly until the Rx antenna height
gets so large that near line of sight is achieved. That is over 100m!! To
obtain the 169dB required figure the mast height would have to be about
250m!!!!!!!

Regards
Jeff


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why Antenna Tuners Aren't Necessarily Useful for Shortwave Listening - Question Shortwave Listening (SWL) Antenna Tuners - Do You Have An Opinion ? Bob Miller Shortwave 40 September 3rd 12 02:15 PM
Why Tilt ? - The Terminated Tilted Folded Dipole (TTFD / T2FD) Antenna RHF Shortwave 2 April 18th 06 10:21 PM
Passive Repeater Bryan Martin Antenna 13 February 10th 06 02:03 PM
The Long and Thin Vertical Loop Antenna. [ The Non-Resonance Vertical with a Difference ] RHF Shortwave 0 December 27th 05 06:03 PM
Grounding Steve Rabinowitz Shortwave 31 December 14th 05 05:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017