Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote
The total distance between the transmitting and receiving antenna of a microwave link at 10GHz, is 30 Km. the height of the Tx antenna is above ground level is 20 m. the maximum acceptable total path loss is 169 dB. Furthermore there is hill located 10 km away from the transmitter antenna with a height of 80m. calculate the height of the receiver antenna for the path loss to be just equal to the maximum acceptable value? _____________ The height above mean sea level of the tx and rx sites, and the terrain profile for the path would be necessary to answer this ~ accurately. But for a smooth earth model, the graphic at the link below will give some insight. It shows that a height of around 270 meters would be needed for the receive antenna, using a K-factor of 1.33 and 0.6 fresnel clearance for an 80 m hill 10 km downrange. The path loss then would be about 142 dB. http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8.../10GigPath.gif RF |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 7 Feb, 15:43, "Richard Fry" wrote:
wrote The total distance between the transmitting and receivingantennaof a microwave link at 10GHz, is 30 Km. the height of the Txantennais above ground level is 20 m. the maximum acceptable total path loss is 169 dB. Furthermore there is hill located 10 km away from the transmitterantennawith a height of 80m. calculate the height of the receiverantennafor the path loss to be just equal to the maximum acceptable value? _____________ The height above mean sea level of the tx and rx sites, and the terrain profile for the path would be necessary to answer this ~ accurately. But for a smooth earth model, the graphic at the link below will give some insight. It shows that a height of around 270 meters would be needed for the receiveantenna, using a K-factor of 1.33 and 0.6 fresnel clearance for an 80 m hill 10 km downrange. The path loss then would be about 142 dB. http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8.../10GigPath.gif RF hi Richard i have read ur response very carefully and its perfect 142dB Path loss but problem is that what's the Rx height if i suppose Tx and Rx install on the same height then my Rx height after the earth buldge and knife e calculation i have got 100m Rx its totally wrong because if i increase that (100m) Rx height its mean get the problem at fresnel Zone need help thanks regard naqvi |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
naqvi wrote
i have read ur response very carefully and its perfect 142dB Path loss but problem is that what's the Rx height if i suppose Tx and Rx install on the same height then my Rx height after the earth buldge and knife e calculation i have got 100m Rx its totally wrong because if i increase that (100m) Rx height its mean get the problem at fresnel Zone _________________ Suggest that you print my graphic, and look for different heights of the transmit and receive antennas that still clear the 80 meter hill by using a straight edge that always crosses the location of the hill at the elevations shown in my plot. It is best to provide more path clearance at the 80 meter hill than I showed, because some K-factor variations could steer that 10 GHz beam into that hill, and cause loss of a usable signal for the receiver. Also remember that this plot was done over a smooth earth. The true elevations at the endpoints of the path and at the hill could be considerably different than I showed. RF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|